Table 1

The rank order and frequency of joint involvement for increasing grades of radiographic osteoarthritis and erosive osteoarthritis

Right handLeft hand
RankK&L≥2K&L≥3K&L=4Erosive osteoarthritisRankK&L≥2K&L≥3K&L=4Erosive osteoarthritis
1DIP2 (30.3%)DIP2 (15.1%)DIP2 (6.3%)DIP2 (3.6%)1DIP2 (21.9%)DIP2 (10.0%)DIP2 (4.1%)DIP2 (3.2%)
2DIP5 (27.2%)DIP3 (9.1%)DIP3 (3.6%)DIP3 (2.5%)2DIP5 (19.9%)DIP5 (8.2%)DIP3 (3.7%)DIP3 (1.9%)
3DIP3 (22.7%)DIP5 (8.2%)DIP5 (3.3%)DIP5 (2.0%)3DIP3 (15.1%)DIP3 (7.5%)DIP5 (3.5%)DIP5 (1.5%)
4PIP5 (12.0%)DIP4 (4.9%)DIP4 (1.6%)DIP4 & PIP3 (0.7%)4PIP2 (9.7%)DIP4 (4.0%)DIP4 (2.1%)DIP4 (1.0%)
5PIP2 (11.8%)PIP3 (3.2%)PIP3 (1.4%)5PIP5 (9.0%)PIP4 (2.5%)PIP3 (1.1%)PIP4 (0.7%)
6PIP3 (11.3%)PIP4 (2.2%)PIP4 (1.0%)PIP4 (0.6%)6PIP3 (8.7%)PIP3 (2.0%)PIP4 (0.8%)PIP5 & PIP3 (0.3%)
7DIP4 (10.8%)PIP2 (2.0%)PIP2 & PIP5 (0.5%)PIP5 (0.3%)7DIP4 (8.3%)PIP5 & PIP2 (1.9%)PIP5 (0.5%)
8PIP4 (6.8%)PIP5 (1.7%)PIP2 (0.1%)8PIP4 (6.3%)PIP2 (0.4%)PIP2 (0.1%)
Spearman rank correlations0.611, p=0.1080.970, p<0.0010.988, p<0.001ReferenceSpearman rank correlations0.539, p=0.1680.958, p<0.0010.958, p<0.001Reference
  • Percentages represent the proportion of joints affected with increasing grades of non-erosive radiographic osteoarthritis and erosive osteoarthritis out of the total number of joints examined.

  • DIP, distal interphalangeal joint; K&L, Kellgren and Lawrence; PIP, proximal interphalangeal joint.