Table 6

 Strength of recommendations

InterventionResearch evidence*SOR based on efficacy (A–D)SOR based on all evidence and clinical expertise NRS, mean (SEM)
EfficacySide effectsCost effectiveness
*Evidence was categorised according to the hierarchy in table 1. –, not supportive; +, supportive. ±, uncertain. Example, Ia + (GI) means there is category Ia evidence to support the statement that the treatment causes GI side effects.
SOR, strength of recommendation; NRS, numeric rating scale (0–10, 0 = not recommended at all, 10 = fully recommended); GI, gastrointestinal; ANA, antinuclear antibodies; –, not available; N/A, not applicable.
PhysiotherapyIb +A7.95 (0.37)
ExerciseIIa +B8.86 (0.27)
EducationN/A8.18 (0.38)
Cognitive therapyN/A4.77 (0.58)
NSAIDsIb +Ia + (GI)N/AA9.14 (0.24)
CoxibsIb +Ia − (GI)Higher GI risk populationA7.82 (0.38)
MisoprostolIa + (GI protection)Ia + (diarrhoea)Higher GI risk populationA5.55 (0.55)
H2 Blockers (double dose)Ia + (GI protection)High GI risk populationA5.73 (0.46)
Proton pump inhibitorsIa + (GI protection)A7.14 (0.39)
SulfasalazineIa ±Ib + (haematological, mucocutaneous, GI)A6.11 (0.72)
MethotrexateIb −Ib + (nausea, hepatic)A3.14 (0.46)
CiclosporinIV +D1.48 (0.38)
AzathioprineIV +D1.33 (0.33)
HydroxychloroquineN/A0.86 (0.30)
AuranofinIII −C0.57 (0.24)
CyclophosphamideIV +D0.86 (0.26)
LeflunomideIb −A2.19 (0.39)
d-PenicillamineIb −A0.90 (0.33)
PamidronateIII +III + (acute phase reaction)C4.29 (0.38)
ThalidomideIII +III + (neurological)C3.48 (0.39)
Methylprednisolone (IV)IV +D3.90 (0.45)
InfliximabIb +Ib + (ANA formation)Cost effectiveA9.48 (0.20)
EtanerceptIb +Ib + (injection site reactions)Cost effectiveA9.48 (0.20)
AdalimumabIII +C7.24 (0.56)
AnakinraIII ±C3.14 (0.53)
Total hip replacementIV +D9.05 (0.28)
Spinal surgeryIV +D7.23 (0.35)