Table 3

Indices of responsiveness at week 28 of follow up, for each treatment group3-150

Combined treatment (n=75)Sulfasalazine (n=79)t Value
Mean changeSEΔ SRM ESMean changeSEΔSRMES
Count core set measures ⩾20% improved5.80.2 3.6 4.50.31.93.9
Change in disease activity by patient, 7 point Likert2.50.1 2.8 1.60.21.14.6
Pooled index composite measure1.50.1 2.4 0.80.11.15.7
MACTAR interview120.6 2.3 3.38.60.81.22.23.8
Count core set measures ⩾50% improved4.80.3 2.2 3.00.31.24.7
Disease activity score (DAS) composite measure−2.30.1 1.8 2.2−1.40.11.01.44.4
AIMS pain scale−8.50.5 1.8 2.4−5.80.61.21.43.5
Health Assessment Questionnaire−1.10.1 1.4 1.5−0.60.10.90.84.5
Pain assessment by patient, VAS−3.40.3 1.4 1.7−2.00.30.70.93.2
Disease activity by patient, 5 point Likert−1.80.2 1.4 1.7−1.20.11.01.22.8
ESR (mm/1st h)−403 1.4 1.2−2731.00.83.1
Swollen joint count ARA 48−101 1.3 1.1−510.70.73.4
Grip strength (kPa)252 1.5 1.61120.70.55.6
Count core set measures ⩾70% improved3.60.3 1.5 1.90.20.94.4
Global assessment by observer, VAS−3.30.3 1.3 1.4−1.70.30.70.83.9
Physical function by patient, 6 point Likert2.00.2 1.3 1.71.40.20.71.22.5
Utility3-151 rating scale technique0.240.02 1.3 1.30.150.020.80.82.7
Tender joint count ARA 68−162 1.1 1.2−820.50.53.7
Ritchie Arthritis Index tender joints−111 1.2 1.1−710.80.72.4
CRP (mg/l)−325 0.9 0.8−2240.70.71.5
AIMS mobility scale5.30.6 1.0 1.03.20.60.60.52.6
Global assessment by patient, VAS−2.40.3 1.0 1.2−1.90.30.71.01.1
AIMS self efficacy scale5.20.7 0.8 0.92.90.70.40.42.3
Utility3-151 standard gamble technique0.100.02 0.7 0.70.060.020.30.31.4
  • 3-150 Abbreviations, see table 2. SRM 95% confidence intervals have a width of <0.5 around the listed value, between-SRMs differences ⩾0.35 are significant (two sided p<0.05, no correction for multiple comparison).

  • 3-151 Utilities were only assessed at week 28.