Table 4

Ultrasound therapy (US): medians and interquartile ranges for baseline scores and for changes in scores since baseline and median differences between groups with 95% confidence intervals

Active US
(n=73)
Dummy US
(n=72)
No US
(n=35)
Active dummy US
D (95%CI)
No dummy US
D (95%CI)
Chief complaint*
 baseline73  (55–84)75  (59–90)70  (52–79)
 6 weeks22  (2–55)22  (1–44)27  (2–42)−3  (−12,  6)−4   (−15, 7)
 3 months31 (14–61)41 (16–62)35 (20–57)3 (−6, 15)3 (−2, 16)
Functional status
 baseline69 (56–81)75 (63–87)75 (63–87)
 6 weeks11 (0–31)7 (−3–20)9 (−6–38)−6 (−13, 2)−2 (−13, 7)
 3 months23 (0–47)15 (0–51)18 (7–45)−3 (−13, 7)−4 (−16, 7)
 6 months36 (6–52)25 (−3–50)10 (−8–60)−3 (−16, 9)3 (−13,  21)
 9 months33 (1–56)38 (9–60)24 (−3–56)2 (−10,  14)7 (−9, 23)
 12 months38 (8–63)49 (25–65)30 (−11–44)9 (−2, 20)23 ( 7, 39)
Pain after assessment*
 baseline34 (8–52)48 (22–65)33 (13–61)
 6 weeks9 (0–32)7 (0–31)7 (−1–28)−1 (−6, 5)3 (−4, 12)
 3 months11 (0–35)14 (2–39)11 (0–28)2 (−5, 9)4 (−4, 15)
Pain yesterday*
 baseline46 (25–55)51 (31–67)46 (32–61)
 6 weeks12 (0–32)13 (1–34)13 (2–21)1 (−7, 8)1 (−7, 10)
 baseline44 (20–71)48 (20–72)49 (24–65)
 6 weeks12 (0–49)15 (0–30)15 (1–29)−4 (−14, 4)−1 (−10, 8)
 3 months25 (1–51)19 (1–45)18 (9–53)−2 (−12, 8)−3 (−14, 7)
Physical impairment*
 baseline49 (19–67)49 (20–77)43 (26–65)
 6 weeks15 (0–29)13 (1–30)11 (0–23)0 (−6, 6)1 (−7, 9)
 3 months20 (2–39)22 (4–39)19 (4–34)1 (−7, 9)2 (−7, 13)
Symptom score §
 baseline49 (27–60)47 (32–65)50 (31–67)
 6 weeks18 (4–34)13 (4–37)21 (10–29)−2 (−10, 7)−2 (−12, 8)
 3 months23 (8–40)23 (8–42)27 (14–32)0 (−7, 9)0 (−8, 10)
Mobility
 baseline44 (17–68)39 (19–64)44 (27–75)
 6 weeks9 (1–30)10 (−4–32)14 (2–30)−1 (−7, 8)−1 (−12, 10)
 3 months13 (1–37)12 (1–38)15 (3–32)1 (−8, 7)0 (−10, 10)
  • D=differences between groups; negative values denote a difference in favour of the dummy treatment. Negative values for median change scores and interquartile ranges denote deterioration. Negative values for differences between groups (D) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) denote a difference in favour of the dummy group.*Patient rating for severity during the previous week on a 100 millimetre visual analogue scale (0/100: best/worst). The chief complaint was logged at baseline, and was defined as an unavoidable painful and/or impaired functioneal activity in which the shoulder is involved. Physical impairment was defined as restriction of functional activities.Rating of research physiotherapist on a 100 millimetre visual analogue scale (0/100: best/worst), based on a standardised assessment of active mobility: (1) glenohumeral-scapulo-thoracic rhythm; reaching with the index finger to (2) the heterolateral scapular angulus inferior and (3) the second thoracic processus spinosus; (4) flexion and (5) abduction. Patient rating for severity of disorder specific functional status limitation during the past 24 hours on the 16 item Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (0/100: best/worst). §Severity rating of research physiotherapist on a 100 millimetre visual analogue scale (0/100: best/worst), based on a standardised clinical assessment. This assessment involved a standardised history; inspection of contour, muscle wasting and swelling; active and passive evaluation of range of motion and pain on abduction, flexion, internal and external rotation, extension and adduction; evaluation of the functional mobility and active glenohumeral-scapulo-thoracic rhythm; evaluation of joint play and pain on accessory movements; evaluation of muscle weakness and pain on isometric muscle testing; and palpatory assessment of pain and tissue condition.