Table 2

Prevalence 1 assuming none of the non-attenders with pain (n=75 of 279) had OA, prevalence 2 assuming that the prevalence of OA was the same in those with pain not attending (75 of 279) as in the group examined (n=204)

Diagnostic group Number of people
with radiographic tibiofemoral OA
Prevalence 1 (%) Prevalence 2 (%) Sex (female/male) Age median (range) BMI median (range)
Ahlbäck ≥ grade 1201.1 (0.63–1.57)1.4 (0.87–1.93)10/1050.0 (38–54)26.0 (20.3–32.7)
KL ≥ grade 2281.5 (0.95–2.05)2.1 (1.45–2.75)13/1549.5 (35–54)26.0 (20.3–37.5)
KL ≥ grade 3160.9 (0.44–1.28)1.2 (0.71–1.69)6/1045.5 (35–54)25.7 (18.3–28.9)
  • The figures in parentheses in the prevalence columns denote the 95% CI. KL= Kellgren & Lawrence. The age was significantly higher in the groups with radiographic OA (without any differences beween the different groups) according to Ahlbäck and Kellgren & Lawrence grade 3 or more (p<0.05) compared with those without radiographic OA. The BMI values did not differ significantly between any of the groups.