Statistics from Altmetric.com
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous group of chronic arthritides of unknown cause with an onset before 16 years of patient age.1 A substantial proportion of patients have polyarticular-course JIA (pcJIA) and are at risk for profound disability.2 ,3 Although these patients may respond to methotrexate (MTX) or biological agents approved for pcJIA, up to 30% continue to have active disease.4 ,5
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is increased in the serum and synovial fluid of patients with pcJIA; IL-6 concentrations are positively correlated with the severity of joint involvement and with C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.6 Tocilizumab is a humanised, monoclonal, antihuman IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) antibody that binds to membrane and soluble IL-6R, inhibiting IL-6–mediated signalling.7 ,8 Clinical trials have shown that tocilizumab is efficacious in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic JIA (sJIA).9 ,10
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with active pcJIA and inadequate responses to MTX.
This three-part study, CHERISH, was conducted by members of the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO)11 and the Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG) at 58 centres in Australia, Canada, Europe, Latin America, Russia and the USA.
Part 1 was a 16-week, active-treatment, open-label, lead-in period in which patients whose body weight (BW) was 30 kg or more received intravenous tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (8 mg/kg for 30 kg or more group) every 4 weeks. Patients weighing less than 30 kg were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive intravenous tocilizumab at 8 mg/kg (8 mg/kg for less than 30 kg group) or 10 mg/kg (10 mg/kg for less than 30 kg group) every 4 weeks. Based on pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation, doses of 10 mg/kg for patients weighing less than 30 kg achieved tocilizumab exposure comparable to that of 8 mg/kg for patients weighing 30 kg or more.
At week 16, patients entered the double-blind withdrawal period (part 2) provided they had experienced at least a JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 30 response (JIA-ACR30), defined as 30% or greater improvement of three or more of the six JIA core response variables (JIA-CRVs) without greater than 30% worsening in more than one of the remaining JIA-CRVs compared with baseline12 (see ‘Assessment and outcomes’). Patients who did not achieve JIA-ACR30 response in part 1 were withdrawn from the study.
In part 2, JIA-ACR30 responders were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive placebo or to continue tocilizumab as in part 1, stratified by MTX and glucocorticoid use. Patients continued in part 2 until week 40, unless they experienced JIA-flare (30% or greater worsening in three of the six JIA-CRVs without more than 30% improvement in more than one remaining JIA-CRV) compared with week 16.13 On completion of part 2 or after JIA-flare, patients entered part 3 of the study (64 weeks) and received open-label tocilizumab at the same dose received in part 1. Throughout, patients continued treatment until withdrawal of informed consent, loss of follow-up or study end.
Here, we report efficacy results to week 40 (end of part 2) and safety results to the last data cut (184.4 patient-years (PY) of tocilizumab exposure). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice guidelines and with local requirements. Enrolment started 14 October 2009 and ended 31 January 2011. The study was reported following recommendations of the CONSORT statement.14
Eligible patients were 2 to 17 years old, received diagnoses of rheumatoid factor-positive or rheumatoid factor-negative pcJIA or extended oligoarticular JIA,15 had disease durations of at least 6 months and had inadequate responses to or were intolerant of MTX. Patients also had to have five or more active joints, defined as the presence of swollen joints (or, in the absence of swelling, joints with limitation of movement (LOM) plus pain on motion and/or tenderness with palpation), with LOM present in at least three of the active joints. Patients could have been previously treated with biological agents. Stable doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, low-dose glucocorticoids (no greater than 0.2 mg/kg/day prednisone; daily maximum, 10 mg) and MTX (10–20 mg/m2 body surface area/week) were allowed. Additional eligibility criteria are listed in online supplementary appendix S1.
Assessment and outcomes
Clinical assessments (baseline, week 2, week 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter) included the six JIA-CRVs: number of joints with active arthritis, number of joints with LOM, physician global assessment (PGA) of disease activity (range, 0–100; 0=inactive disease), assessment of patient overall well-being (range, 0–100; 0=very poor), physical function measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (CHAQ-DI; range, 0–3; 0=no disability) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).16 Clinically inactive disease was defined as PGA, indicating no disease activity plus absence of all the following: joints with active arthritis, uveitis and ESR greater than 20 mm/h.17
The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients in whom a JIA-flare occurred13 during part 2 (up to and including week 40) compared with week 16. Secondary end points evaluated at week 40 included JIA-ACR30/50/70/90 responses,16 change from baseline in JIA-CRVs and clinically inactive disease.17
Sample size estimation assumed JIA-flare rates of 35% for the tocilizumab groups and 65% for the placebo group in part 2. Thus, 60 patients had to be randomly assigned to each group in part 2 to achieve more than 80% power to detect a significant difference in JIA-flare rates between groups using a two-sided significance test with α=0.05. Based on an expected JIA-ACR30 response rate of 65% in the tocilizumab group in part 1, recruitment of 185 patients into part 1 was planned to ensure that a sufficient number of patients were available for randomisation in part 2. To control for the type 1 error rate, secondary end points were tested in a hierarchical fixed-sequence approach provided the primary end point was found to be statistically significant (see online supplementary table S1).
Primary end point analysis was conducted with the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel (CMH) test, adjusted for stratification factors (background use of MTX and oral glucocorticoids); patients who withdrew or for whom the end point could not be determined were considered to have experienced JIA-flare. For secondary end points, the CMH test was used to determine statistical significance for differences in JIA-ACR30/50/70/90 responders at week 40 compared with baseline; patients who escaped or withdrew or for whom the end point could not be determined were considered non-responders. Continuous variables were evaluated using analysis of variance, adjusted for baseline differences between groups and stratification variables. A last-observation-carried-forward approach was used for patients who withdrew or experienced flare and who escaped to open-label tocilizumab.
Ad hoc analysis was conducted in patients continuously treated with tocilizumab up to week 40, including those who escaped from blinded to open-label tocilizumab, using an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach. Evaluations of JIA-flare (primary outcome), JIA-ACR response rates and clinically inactive disease status were performed in real time by independent masked evaluators at the coordinating centres of PRINTO and PRCSG, according to validated criteria.2 ,13 ,16 ,17
The safety population consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study medication. Safety data included full-exposure data for each patient. Exposure to tocilizumab varied for individual patients, depending on the period from the first dose of tocilizumab to the date of data cut or withdrawal (maximum exposure, 1.8 years). Serious infections were defined in accordance with the definition of serious adverse events (SAEs) in the International Conference on Harmonisation guidelines.18 The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00988221.
Patient demographics and disposition
In part 1, 188 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of tocilizumab (figure 1). Disease characteristics at baseline were generally similar across the three groups, with exceptions as expected according to the body weight-based dosing regimen (table 1).
In part 1, 15 (7.9%) of 188 patients did not achieve JIA-ACR30 response and were discontinued from the study (figure 1). Additional withdrawals in part 1 occurred because of AEs (three patients), refusal of treatment (three patients) and loss of follow-up (one patient). Of the remaining 166 patients who entered part 2, 6 were discontinued (AEs, 3 patients; insufficient therapeutic response, 2 patients; withdrawal of consent, 1 patient). Because 3 of the 166 patients entering part 2 discontinued the study before receiving a single dose of study drug, the ITT population for part 2 was 163 patients—81 randomly assigned to placebo and 82 to continued tocilizumab.
Efficacy in the open-label phase (part 1)
Part 1 was completed by 168 (89.4%) of 188 patients achieving JIA-ACR30 response (figure 2A). Higher-level JIA-ACR70 and JIA-ACR90 responses were attained by 117 (62.2%) of 188 and 49 (26.1%) of 188 patients, respectively. All six JIA-CRVs markedly improved from baseline to week 16 (figure 2B).
JIA-ACR30/50/70/90 response rates were numerically lower in the 8 mg/kg less than 30 kg group than in the other two groups (figure 2C). Consistently, tocilizumab concentrations over time and steady-state exposures were numerically lower in the 8 mg/kg less than 30 kg group than in the other two groups (see online supplementary table S2, supplementary figure S1A). Changes in soluble IL-6R levels and inflammation markers (CRP, ESR) were also more similar between 10 mg/kg for the less than 30 kg group and 8 mg/kg for the 30 kg or more group (see online supplementary figure S1B–D).
Efficacy in the double-blind, withdrawal phase (part 2)
The primary end point at week 40 was met; there were significantly more JIA-flares in the placebo group than in patients remaining on tocilizumab (39/81 (48.1%) vs 21/82 (25.6%); adjusted difference in flare rate: −0.21; 95% CI −0.35 to −0.08; p=0.0024). JIA-flares were evident in the placebo group as early as 28 days after randomisation in part 2 (figure 2D). Robustness of the primary end point result was confirmed by logistic regression analysis (see online supplementary appendix S2).
In the placebo and the tocilizumab groups, JIA-ACR70 and JIA-ACR90 response rates were numerically higher in patients receiving MTX than in those not receiving MTX; rates were numerically lower in patients who previously received other biological agents than in biological-naive patients (table 2). No differences were observed in response to tocilizumab between patients who were rheumatoid factor-positive and those who were not (data not shown).
Ad hoc analysis of patients who received tocilizumab continuously in parts 1 and 2, including those who escaped in part 2, demonstrated JIA-ACR70 and JIA-ACR90 response rates of 78.0% (64/82) and 48.8% (40/82), respectively, at week 40 compared with baseline, with improvement from baseline in all individual JIA-CRVs (table 3).
AEs and SAEs are shown in table 4 for the safety population (n=188) at the time of data cut. Overall, 159 (84.6%) patients reported at least one AE. Rates of AEs/100 PY of exposure were similar across the three groups (8 mg/kg for 30 kg or more, 501.9; 10 mg/kg for less than 30 kg, 445.6; 8 mg/kg for less than 30 kg, 471.9). A total of 16 AEs in 16 (8.5%) patients were considered severe, and seven AEs led to study discontinuation. Common AEs were pneumonia, reported in four (2.1%) patients (three in the 8 mg/kg for 30 kg or more group, one in the 10 mg/kg for less than 30 kg group), followed by bronchitis in two (1.1%) patients (both in the 10 mg/kg for less than 30 kg group) and cellulitis in two (1.1%) patients (both in the 8 mg/kg for 30 kg or more group).
No deaths were reported during the study, and no malignancies were identified. In the safety population, 17 (9.0%) patients reported 22 SAEs, with a rate of 12.5/100 PY. Also, 5 of the 22 SAEs (benign intracranial hypertension, uveitis, urinary calculus, pneumonia, cellulitis) in 5 (2.7%) patients were considered by the investigator to be related to tocilizumab.
Laboratory abnormalities included alanine aminotransferase elevations 3× upper limit of normal (ULN) or greater in seven (3.7%) patients, aspartate aminotransferase elevations 3× ULN or greater in one (0.5%) patient, neutropenia (less than 1000 cells/mm3) in seven (3.7%) patients and thrombocytopenia (less than 50 000 cells/mm3) in two (1%) patients. These haematological abnormalities were not associated with infection or bleeding events. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels 110 mg/dL or greater were observed in 21 (11.4%) patients, whereas total cholesterol levels 170 mg/dL or greater occurred in 64 (34.6%) of 185 patients assessed for cholesterol. No patients were treated with lipid-lowering agents. One patient had a positive antitocilizumab antibody assay result, without anaphylactic reaction, and discontinued during part 1 for lack of efficacy.
Results of this study demonstrate that intravenous tocilizumab 10 mg/kg administered every 4 weeks in patients weighing less than 30 kg and intravenous tocilizumab 8 mg/kg administered every 4 weeks in patients weighing 30 kg or more are safe and efficacious for the management of pcJIA. Results were clinically meaningful because a high proportion (89%) of patients achieved JIA-ACR30 response by week 16; 62% of patients achieved JIA-ACR70 response, and 26% even achieved JIA-ACR90 response.
The primary end point at week 40 was met: significantly more placebo-treated than tocilizumab-treated patients experienced JIA-flare during the double-blind, 24-week withdrawal phase. Patients who received tocilizumab for 40 weeks experienced marked improvement in all JIA-CRVs from baseline.
At the end of part 1, JIA-ACR response rates in patients weighing less than 30 kg who received tocilizumab 10 mg/kg were similar to those in patients weighing 30 kg or more who received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg, whereas rates were lower in patients weighing less than 30 kg who received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg. This is consistent with the 8 mg/kg dose resulting in a lower tocilizumab exposure in patients weighing less than 30 kg. Higher body weight-adjusted dosing in lighter patients with pcJIA is consistent with the kind of dosing required to achieve comparable tocilizumab exposures and JIA-ACR response rates between lighter and heavier patients with pcJIA.10
Notably, the results reported here reflect the efficacy of tocilizumab when 24 (14.7%) of 163 patients received suboptimal doses of tocilizumab (ie, patients weighing less than 30 kg who received the 8 mg/kg dose). The absolute difference in flare rates among groups observed in this study may be influenced by longevity of the drug response and duration of the withdrawal phase.
Biological agent-naive patients experienced a lower incidence of flare regardless of assignation to tocilizumab or placebo. This observation is in keeping with reports from clinical trials of other biological agents in pcJIA5 and is consistent with the notion that patients who received previous biological therapy represent a more treatment-resistant subgroup.19 Nevertheless, JIA-ACR70 response was observed in 48.1% of tocilizumab-treated patients whose previous treatment with a biological agent failed.
Similarly, concomitant MTX yielded fewer flare events, regardless of assignation to tocilizumab or placebo. Statistical testing was not planned to assess the significance of the impact of MTX on efficacy outcomes. However, even without background MTX, 53.3% of the patients receiving tocilizumab achieved JIA-ACR70 response by week 40.
The pattern of AEs observed in this study of patients with pcJIA is consistent with the known safety profile of tocilizumab reported in other phase 3 studies.20 The frequency of neutropenia (3.7%) was similar to that reported in adults with RA (4.7%)20 but lower than that reported in children with sJIA (16.9%) who receive tocilizumab in 2-weekly intervals.10 Similarly, the rate of serious infections (4.9/100 PY) was lower than that reported for children with sJIA (11.0/100 PY)10 but similar to that reported for adults with RA (4.7/100 PY).
Hypercholesterolemia occurred in adults with RA20 and in children with sJIA. Levels of cholesterol exceeding the ULN for total-cholesterol or LDL-cholesterol were observed at least once in 31% of the patients who received tocilizumab.10 Total-cholesterol levels above 170 mg/dL occurred in 34.6% of children in this study with pcJIA, whereas 11.4% had LDL-cholesterol levels of 110 mg/dL or greater. Total-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol exceeding such levels have been considered marginally elevated in children.21 The clinical relevance of isolated elevations in cholesterol level, as observed in this study, is unclear because of diurnal variations in lipid levels and because of differences in normative values based on age and sex.22 Of note, lipid elevations in adults with RA treated with tocilizumab do not appear to convey increased risks for cardiovascular disorders or events with appropriate management.9
This study allowed for the acquisition of data on the magnitude of the therapeutic effect of tocilizumab in patients with active pcJIA (part 1) and for the demonstration that this effect was indeed due to tocilizumab (part 2). Although the withdrawal design of this study was valuable in minimising placebo treatment in children with pcJIA, it had potential limitations. Patients who did not achieve JIA-ACR30 responses in the open-label, lead-in phase on tocilizumab were withdrawn, limiting information about dose responsiveness. Lead-in treatment of placebo patients with tocilizumab limited the ability to determine safety and efficacy differences over the limited withdrawal period, especially because the biological effects of tocilizumab might have endured beyond the time taken to clear the drug.
Tocilizumab treatment provided sustained and clinically meaningful improvement for patients with pcJIA on monthly dosing of 8 mg/kg in patients weighing 30 kg or more and 10 mg/kg in patients weighing less than 30 kg. The safety profile of tocilizumab in this patient population was consistent with that seen in adults with RA.
We thank Sara Duggan, PhD, Mark English, PhD, Santo D'Angelo, PhD, MS, and Susan Quiñones, PhD, who provided writing and editorial services on behalf of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. We are indebted to the staff of the PRINTO and PRCSG coordinating centres, namely T. Sherrard, A. Johnson, A. Merritt, W. Long, Simona Angioloni, Laura Carenini, Chiara Pallotti, Eugenia Mosci, Marco Garrone, Irene Gregorini, Silvia Scala, Luca Villa and Giuseppe Silvestri. We also thank all additional members of the PRINTO and PRCSG networks who participated as investigators (physicians, nurses and other health professionals) in the study and whose enthusiastic efforts made this work possible: Argentina: Graciela Espada, MD; Australia: Roger Allen, MD, Jeffrey Chaitow, MD; Belgium: Rik Joos, MD, Carine Wouters, MD; Brazil: Sheila Knupp, MD, Flavio Sztajnbok, MD; Canada: David Cabral, MD, Kristin Houghton, MD, Johannes Roth, MD, Heinrike Schmeling, MD; France: Chantal Job-Deslandre, MD, Christian Jorgensen, MD, Isabelle Konepaut, MD; Germany: Kirsten Minden, MD, Frank Weller, MD; Italy: Valeria Gerloni, MD, Francesco Zulian, MD; Mexico: Ruben Burgos-Vargas, MD, Carolina Duarte Salazar, MD, Eunice Solis Vallejo, MD; Peru: Armando Calvo, MD, José Chavez, MD, Manuel Ferrandiz Zavaler, MD; Poland: Anna Gruenpeter, MD, Katarzyna Kobusinska, MD; Russia: Alexey Sarychev, MD, Elena Zholobova, MD; UK: Athimalaipet Ramanan, MD, Patricia Woo, MD; USA: Abraham Gedalia, MD, Steven Goodman, MD, Yukiko Kimura, MD, Karen Onel, MD, and Kenneth Schikler, MD.
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data supplement 1 - Online supplement
Handling editor Tore K Kvien
HIB and NR contributed equally.
Collaborators Argentina: Graciela Espada; Australia: Roger Allen, Jeffrey Chaitow; Belgium: Rik Joos, Carine Wouters; Brazil: Sheila Knupp, Flavio Sztajnbok; Canada: David Cabral, Kristin Houghton, Johannes Roth, Heinrike Schmeling; France: Chantal Job-Deslandre, Christian Jorgensen, Isabelle Kone Paut; Germany: Kirsten Minden, Frank Weller-Heinemann; Italy: Valeria Gerloni, Francesco Zulian; Mexico: Ruben Burgos-Vargas, Carolina Duarte Salazar, Eunice Solis-Vallejo; Peru: Armando Calvo, José Chavez, Manuel Ferrandiz Zavaler; Poland: Anna Gruenpeter, Katarzyna Kobusinska; Russia: Alexey Sarychev, Elena Zholobova; UK: Athimalaipet Ramanan, Patricia Woo; USA: Steven Goodman, Abraham Gedalia, Yukiko Kimura, Karen Onel, Kenneth Schikler.
Contributors All authors edited and critically reviewed the manuscript drafts and approved of the final version submitted for publication. HIB performed a literature search and was involved in study design, collection and interpretation of data, and writing the manuscript. NR performed a literature search and was involved in figure preparation, study design, collection and interpretation of data, and writing the manuscript. ZZ was involved in collection and interpretation of data and writing the manuscript. CK was involved in analysis and interpretation of data and writing the manuscript. OH performed a literature search and was involved in data interpretation and writing the manuscript. AK was involved in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing the manuscript. PL was involved in figure preparation, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing the manuscript. RC, VK, RMX, IC, IN, NR-P, EA, VC, GH, VO-W, PQ, CAS, ES, AS, EB and MLGG were involved in collection and interpretation of data and writing the manuscript. CR was involved in collection and interpretation of data. DS and ES were involved in collection and interpretation of data and writing the manuscript. DL was involved in collection and interpretation of data and writing the manuscript. AM was involved in study design, collection and interpretation of data, and writing the manuscript. FDB was the principal investigator, performed a literature search and was involved in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing the manuscript.
Funding Funding for manuscript preparation was provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Competing interests HIB has in the past three years received honoraria and speaker bureau fees from AbbVie, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Roche and Janssen; the CCHMC, where she holds a full-time position, has received contributions to support the research activities of the PRCSG network (http://www.prcsg.org) from Roche, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer Inc. and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc. NR has in the past three years received honoraria and speaker bureau fees from AbbVie, Alter, Medac, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CD-Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Italfarmaco, MedImmune, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; the GASLINI Hospital, where he works as a full-time employee, has received contributions to support the research activities of PRINTO (http://www.printo.it) from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen Biologics B.V., Eli Lilly and Company, ‘Francesco Angelini’, GlaxoSmithKline, Italfarmaco, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Schwarz Biosciences GmbH, Xoma and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc. ZZ declares no conflicts of interest. CK is an employee of Roche. OH was employed by F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd, the funding source, at the time the study was conducted. AK is an employee of Roche Products Ltd. PL was employed by Roche at the time the study was conducted. RC declares no conflicts of interest. VK declares no conflicts of interest. RMX has received funding for paid conferences and travel grants from Roche. ICP declares no conflicts of interest. IN has received consulting fees and travel grants from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche. NR-P declares no conflicts of interest. EA has received research grants from Roche, Abbot, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor and Novartis and has received honoraria as a speaker for Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Medac, Novartis and Pfizer. VC declares no conflicts of interest. GH has received grant/research support from AbbVie (Abbott) and Pfizer (Wyeth). VO-W declares no conflicts of interest. PQ has received research grants from AbbVie, Novartis and Pfizer and consultancy or speaker bureau fees from AbbVie, BMS, Chugai-Roche, MedImmune, Pfizer, Novartis, Servier and Swedish Orphan Biovitrum. CAS declares no conflicts of interest. ES declares no conflicts of interest. AS declares no conflicts of interest. EB has received consulting fees and travel grants from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche. MLGG declares no conflicts of interest. AM declares no conflicts of interest. CR declares no conflicts of interest. DS declares no conflicts of interest. ES declares no conflicts of interest. DL reports support from AstraZeneca, Centocor, Wyeth, Amgen, Abbot, Pfizer, Regeneron, Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, UCB, Horizon and Forest Research. AM has in the past three years received honoraria and speaker bureau fees from Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, BMS, Sanofi, MedImmune and Novo Nordisk; the GASLINI Hospital, where he works as a full-time employee, has received contributions to support the research activities of PRINTO (http://www.printo.it) from Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen Biologics B.V., Eli Lilly and Company, ‘Francesco Angelini’, GlaxoSmithKline, Italfarmaco, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Schwarz Biosciences GmbH, Xoma and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc. FDB has received an unrestricted grant and travel grants from Hoffmann-La Roche.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice guidelines and with local requirements. Enrolment started 14 October 2009 and ended 31 January 2011.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.