Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Concise report
Performance of classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis in the Leiden early arthritis cohort
  1. Rosaline van den Berg1,
  2. Floris van Gaalen2,
  3. Annette van der Helm-van Mil1,
  4. Tom Huizinga1,
  5. Désirée van der Heijde1
  1. 1Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, LUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Professor Désirée van der Heijde, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, Leiden, The Netherlands; mail{at}dvanderheijde.nl

Abstract

Objectives The performance of spondyloarthritis (SpA) classification criteria is not well-established in general early arthritis cohorts. Therefore, the authors tested their performance in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic (EAC) cohort and assessed whether these criteria can assist rheumatologists in diagnosing patients.

Methods The authors identified all SpA and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients in the EAC cohort according to the diagnosis of the treating rheumatologist. A control group consisting of arthritis patients with other diagnoses was matched to the SpA and PsA patients on gender, age and symptom duration. The authors assessed the fulfilment of SpA criteria in all three groups.

Results Of the patients in the EAC cohort (n=2011), 7.5% was diagnosed with PsA and 3.8% with SpA. In the PsA group, the ClASsification criteria for Psoratic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria had the highest sensitivity (88.7%). In the SpA group, the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) peripheral SpA and European Spondylarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) criteria had the highest sensitivity (both 48.7%). Specificity of all criteria sets was good: ranging from 88.5% (ESSG) to 100% (Amor).

Conclusions In early arthritis, sensitivity of SpA classification criteria is modest except for the CASPAR criteria in PsA. However, specificity of classification criteria, including the new ASAS-peripheral SpA criteria, is high.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was approved by the local medical ethical committee of the Leiden University Medical Center.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.