rss
Ann Rheum Dis doi:10.1136/ard.2009.108274

Assessment of active spinal inflammatory changes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: Validation of whole body MRI against conventional MRI

  1. Ulrich Weber (ulrich.weber{at}balgrist.ch)
  1. Balgrist University Hospital, Switzerland
    1. Juerg Hodler (juerg.hodler{at}balgrist.ch)
    1. Balgrist University Hospital, Switzerland
      1. Anne G Jurik (jurik{at}dadlnet.dk)
      1. Aarhus Municipal Hospital, Denmark
        1. Christian W A Pfirrmann (christian.pfirrmann{at}balgrist.ch)
        1. Balgrist University Hospital, Switzerland
          1. Kaspar Rufibach (kaspar.rufibach{at}ifspm.uzh.ch)
          1. University of Zurich, Biostatistics Unit, Switzerland
            1. Rudolf O Kissling (rudolf.kissling{at}balgrist.ch)
            1. Balgrist University Hospital, Switzerland
              1. Muhammad A Khan (mkhan{at}metrohealth.org)
              1. Case Western Reserve University at MetroHealth Medical Center, United States
                1. Robert G W Lambert (robert.lambert{at}capitalhealth.ca)
                1. University of Alberta, Canada
                  1. Walter P Maksymowych (walter.maksymowych{at}ualberta.ca)
                  1. University of Alberta, Canada
                    • Published Online First 4 May 2009

                    Abstract

                    Objective: To evaluate the performance of whole body (WB) MRI versus conventional (CON) MRI in assessing active inflammatory lesions of the entire spine in patients with established and clinically active axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) using the Spondyloarthritis Research Con-sortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI index.

                    Methods: 32 consecutive SpA patients fulfilling the modified New York criteria and with clinically active disease (BASDAI score ≥ 4) were scanned by sagittal WB and CON MRI of the spine. The MR images were scored independently in random order by 3 readers blinded to patient identifiers. Active inflammatory lesions of the spine were recorded on a web-based scoring form. Pearson correlation coefficient served to compare scores for WB and CON MRI for each rater whilst intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess inter-observer reliability.

                    Results: The median percentage of inflammatory lesions recorded concordantly for both WB and CON MRI ranged from 83% to 91% for the 3 readers; 4% to 9% were only recorded by WB MRI, and 4% to 9% were recorded by CON MRI only. The Pearson correlation coeffi-cient between WB and CON MRI per rater was 0.79, 0.89 and 0.81, respectively. The ICC(2, 1) for CON MRI was 0.75, 0.80 and 0.68 and for WB MRI 0.82, 0.83 and 0.93, respectively, for the 3 possible reader pairs.

                    Conclusion: WB and CON MRI scores showed a high correlation and comparable high reli-ability for the detection of active inflammatory lesions in the spine of patients with clinically active SpA.

                    Register for free content

                    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

                    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.