Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

other Versions

PDF
The development of the L-QoL: A quality of life instrument specific to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  1. L C Doward (ldoward{at}galen-research.com)
  1. Galen Research Ltd, United Kingdom
    1. S P McKenna (smckenna{at}galen-research.com)
    1. University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom
      1. D Whalley (diane.mcdowell{at}yahoo.co.uk)
      1. University of Manchester, United Kingdom
        1. A Tennant (a.tennant{at}leeds.ac.uk)
        1. University of Leeds, United Kingdom
          1. B Griffiths (bridget.griffiths{at}newcastle.ac.uk)
          1. The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, United Kingdom
            1. P Emery (p.emery{at}leeds.ac.uk)
            1. University of Leeds, United Kingdom
              1. D J Veale (douglas.veale{at}ucd.ie)
              1. St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Eire

                Abstract

                Objectives: Complex diseases such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) present dilemmas over choice of outcome measures. Using a battery of instruments to capture the impact of different impairments or activity limitations experienced does not provide assessment of the wider impact on quality of life (QoL). This paper describes the development and testing of a new instrument to measure quality of life in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (L-QoL).

                Methods: The development combines theoretical strengths of the needs-based QoL model with statistical and diagnostic powers of the Rasch model. Content was derived from in-depth interviews with relevant patients. Cognitive debriefing interviews assessed face and content validity. Rasch analysis was applied to data from an initial postal survey to remove misfitting items. A second postal survey assessed scaling properties, reliability, internal consistency and validity.

                Results: A 55-item questionnaire was derived from interview transcripts. Cognitive debriefing confirmed acceptability. Rasch analysis of postal survey data (n=95) removed misfitting items. A second postal survey (n=93), produced a 25-item version with good item fit and stability, excellent test-retest reliability (0.92), internal consistency (0.92) and strict unidimensionality.

                Conclusions It is concluded that the L-QoL should prove a valuable instrument for assessing patient-based outcome in clinical trials and practice.

                Statistics from Altmetric.com

                Request permissions

                If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

                Linked Articles

                • Miscellaneous
                  BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism