Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Head-to-head comparison of the Lyon schuss and fixed flexion radiographic techniques. Long-term reproducibility in normal knees and sensitivity to change in osteoarthritic knees.
  1. Marie-Pierre Hellio Le Graverand (helliomp{at}pfizer.com)
  1. Pfizer Global Research & Development, United States
    1. Eric P Vignon (eric.vignon{at}chu-lyon.fr)
    1. University of Lyon, France
      1. Kenneth D Brandt (kenbrandt{at}yahoo.com)
      1. Indiana University School of Medicine, United States
        1. Steven A Mazzuca (smazzuca{at}iupui.edu)
        1. Indiana University School of Medicine, United States
          1. Muriel Piperno (muriel.piperno{at}chu-lyon.fr)
          1. University of Lyon, France
            1. Robert Buck (robert.j.buck{at}pfizer.com)
            1. Pfizer Global Research & Development, United States
              1. H. Cecil Charles (cecil.charles{at}duke.edu)
              1. Duke Image Analysis Laboratory, United States
                1. David J Hunter (djhunter{at}bu.edu)
                1. Boston University Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, United States
                  1. Christopher G. Jackson
                  1. University of Utah School of Medicine, United States
                    1. Virginia Byers Kraus (vbk{at}acpub.duke.edu)
                    1. Duke University Medical Center, United States
                      1. Thomas M. Link
                      1. Department of Radiology, University of California, United States
                        1. Thomas J. Schnitzer (tjs{at}northwestern.edu)
                        1. Northwestern University, United States
                          1. Austin Vaz
                          1. University of Arizona, United States
                            1. Brad Wyman
                            1. Pfizer Global Research & Development, United States

                              Abstract

                              Objective: The Lyon schuss (LS) and fixed flexion (FF) views of the knee are superior to a conventional standing anteroposterior view in evaluating joint space narrowing (JSN) in osteoarthritis (OA). Both position the knee identically but only the LS aligns the medial tibial plateau (MTP) with the x-ray beam fluoroscopically. The present study provides the first head-to-head comparison of the LS and FF views.

                              Methods: At baseline and 12 months, 62 OA and 99 control knees were imaged twice on the same day with LS and FF views. Minimum joint space width (mJSW) was measured by computer and MTP alignment was assessed from the distance between anterior and posterior margins of the MTP (intermargin distance, IMD). Reproducibility of measurements of mJSW and sensitivity to change were evaluated.

                              Results: In normal knees, JSW did not vary over 12 months with either view. In OA knees, 12-month mJSN was 0.22 ± 0.43 mm with the LS view and -0.01 ± 0.46 mm with the FF view (p=0.0002 and p=0.92, respectively). Mean IMD was only half as large in LS as in FF views (0.9 ± 0.5 mm vs. 1.9 ± 1.2 mm, p<0.0001).

                              Conclusion: LS and FF radiographs offer similar reproducibility in JSW measurement. However, presumably due to its superiority in aligning the MTP, the LS view is much more sensitive to JSN in OA knees.

                              • joint space narrowing
                              • joint space width
                              • knee
                              • osteoarthritis
                              • radiography

                              Statistics from Altmetric.com

                              Request permissions

                              If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.