Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Eular evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis - report of a task force of the Eular Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics(ESCISIT)
  1. W Zhang (weiya.zhang{at}nottingham.ac.uk)
  1. Nottingham University, United Kingdom
    1. M Doherty (michael.doherty{at}nottingham.ac.uk)
    1. Nottingham University, United Kingdom
      1. B F Leeb (leeb.khstockerau{at}aon.at)
      1. 2 nd Dept. of Medicine Lower Austrian Center of Rheumatology, Austria
        1. L Alekseeva
        1. Russian Academic Medical School, Russian Federation
          1. N K Arden (nka{at}mrc.soton.ac.uk)
          1. Southampton General Hospital, United Kingdom
            1. J W Bijlsma (j.w.j.bijlsma{at}azu.nl)
            1. Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
              1. F Dincer
              1. Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Turkey
                1. K Dziedzic
                1. Primary Care Musculoskeletal Research Centre, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
                  1. H J Häuselmann
                  1. Clinic Im Park Hirslanden Group, Centre for Rheumatology and Bone Disease, Zurich, Switzerland
                    1. G Herrero-Beaumont
                    1. Servicio de Reumatologia, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
                      1. P Kaklamanis
                      1. 16, Anaperon Polemou St, Athens, Greece
                        1. S Lohmander (stefan.lohmander{at}med.lu.se)
                        1. Lund University, Sweden
                          1. E Maheu
                          1. Rheumatology, Hospital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
                            1. E Martín-Mola
                            1. Servicio de Reumatologia, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
                              1. K Pavelka
                              1. Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, Prague, Czech Republic
                                1. L Punzi
                                1. Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padova, Italy
                                  1. S Reiter
                                  1. Rheumatology Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany
                                    1. J Sautner
                                    1. 2nd Department of Medicine, Lower Austrian Center for Rheumatology, Stockerau, Austria
                                      1. J Smolen
                                      1. Department of Medicine, Krankenhauz Lainz, Vienna, Austria
                                        1. G Verbruggen
                                        1. Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
                                          1. I Zimmermann-Górska
                                          1. Department of Rheumatology, Rehabilitation and Internal Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Po, Poland

                                            Abstract

                                            Objectives: To develop evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis (OA).

                                            Methods: The multidisciplinary guideline development group comprised 16 rheumatologists, 1 physiatrist, 1 orthopaedic surgeon, 2 allied health professionals and 1 evidence based medicine expert, representing 15 different European countries. Each participant contributed up to 10 propositions describing key clinical points regarding management of hand OA. Final recommendations were agreed using a Delphi consensus approach. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index, AMED, Cochrane Library, HTA and NICE reports was used to identify the best available research evidence to support each of the propositions. Where possible the effect size and number needed to treat were calculated for efficacy. Relative risk or odds ratio was estimated for safety and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was used for cost- effectiveness. The strength of recommendation was provided according to research evidence, clinical expertise and perceived patient preference.

                                            Results: Eleven key propositions involving 17 treatment modalities were generated through three Delphi rounds. Treatment topics included general considerations (eg, clinical features, risk factors, co-morbidities), non-pharmacological (eg, education plus exercise, local heat and splint), pharmacological (eg, paracetamol, NSAIDs, NSAIDs plus gastroprotective agents, COX-2 inhibitors, systemic slow acting disease-modifying drugs, intra-articular corticosteroid) and surgery. Of 17 treatment modalities, only 6 were supported by research evidence (education plus exercise, NSAIDs, COX- 2 inhibitors, topical NSAIDs, topical capsaicin and chondroitin sulphate). Others were supported either by evidence extrapolated from studies of OA affecting other joint sites or by expert opinion. Strength of recommendation varied according to level of evidence, benefits and harms/costs of the treatment and clinical expertise.

                                            Conclusion: Eleven key recommendations for treatment of hand OA were developed using a combination of research-based evidence and expert consensus. The evidence was evaluated and the strength of recommendation was provided.

                                            • EULAR
                                            • hand osteoarthritis
                                            • treatment guidelines

                                            Statistics from Altmetric.com

                                            • Files in this Data Supplement:

                                            Request permissions

                                            If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.