Article Text

PDF
SAT0240 Phase 3 trial results with blisibimod, a selective inhibitor of B-cell activating factor, in subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
  1. J Merrill1,
  2. RS Martin2,
  3. WR Shanahan2,
  4. M Scheinberg3,
  5. K Kalunian4,
  6. D Wofsy5
  1. 1OMRF, Oklahoma
  2. 2ANTHERA, Hayward, United States
  3. 3Hospital Abreu Sodré, Sao Paolo, Brazil
  4. 4UCSD, San Diego
  5. 5UCSF, San Francisco, United States

Abstract

Background Targeted, biologic inhibitors of B-cell Activating Factor (BAFF) have been evaluated in Phase 3 trials in over 5000 patients with SLE. Post hoc analyses of these studies identify lower placebo response and greater treatment effect using more stringent endpoints in patients entering with higher disease activity, greater corticosteroid doses, and/or anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and low complement C3 or C41,2.

Objectives The Phase 3 CHABLIS-SC1 trial evaluated blisibimod, an inhibitor of B-cell activating factor (BAFF), in a “responder population” identified from prior studies with this drug class.

Methods 442 SLE patients with anti-nuclear antibodies or anti-dsDNA, SELENA-SLEDAI score ≥10 on standard of care medications were randomized to receive weekly subcutaneous blisibimod (200 mg) or placebo. Corticosteroid taper was encouraged from Week 8 with the goal to reach ≤7.5 mg prednisone/day. The primary endpoint at Week 52 was the SLE Responder Index-6 (SRI-6): ≥6-point improvement in SELENA-SLEDAI, no new BILAG 1A or 2B domain scores, and <0.3-point increase in Physician's Global Assessment.

Results This study did not meet its primary endpoint at Week 52. Response rates to blisibimod were equivalent to past trials of BAFF inhibitors, but the placebo response was greater. A slightly higher proportion of subjects on blisibimod met the SRI-6 and SRI-4 criteria at most timepoints and more blisibimod-treated subjects achieved corticosteroid taper to prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day from Week 40 through Week 52 (p=0.04 at Week 44). Reductions in peripheral B cell lineages, anti-dsDNA, anti-phospholipid antibodies, and serum immunoglobulins, and increases in complement C3 and C4 were observed with blisibimod (see Table).

Blisibimod was well-tolerated. The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection (10.6% vs 14.3% on placebo), urinary tract infection (6.9% vs 10.7%), injection site erythema (7.8% vs 2.0%), injection site reaction (7.3% vs 2.6%), and diarrhea (7.3% vs 2.6%).

Table of Results

Conclusions With a deliberate focus on a “responder population” for whom lower placebo rates were observed in previous trials, much higher placebo response rates were observed in the CHABLIS-SC1 trial. Modest benefits of blisibimod were observed on serological effects and corticosteroid tapering.

References

  1. van Vollenhoven RF et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1343.

  2. Merrill JT et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(2):332–40.

References

Disclosure of Interest J. Merrill Grant/research support from: BMS, GSK, Consultant for: Anthera, GSK, EMD Serono, Lilly, Astra Zeneca, BMS, UCB, Celgene, Biogen, R. Martin Shareholder of: Anthera, Employee of: Anthera, W. Shanahan Shareholder of: Anthera, Employee of: Anthera, M. Scheinberg Consultant for: GSK,Pfizer, Janssen, Genzyme,Anthera, Novartis, Speakers bureau: GSK,Pfizer, Janssen, Genzyme,Anthera, Novartis, K. Kalunian Grant/research support from: GSK, Celgene, UCB, Consultant for: Anthera, Genentech, BMS, Lilly, Biogen, Shire, Exagen, D. Wofsy Consultant for: Anthera, Genentech, Amgen, GSK

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.