Article Text

PDF
THU0078 Concomitant use of conventional synthetic dmards and response to baricitinib
  1. A Kavanaugh1,
  2. C Helt2,
  3. D Muram2,
  4. J Alam2,
  5. V Arora2,
  6. AL Pinto Correia2,
  7. I de la Torre2,
  8. R van Vollenhoven3
  1. 1UC San Diego School of Medicine, la Jolla
  2. 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States
  3. 3Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunol Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

Background Baricitinib (BARI), an oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, is in development for patients (pts) with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).1,2

Objectives This post-hoc analysis of two phase 3 studies assessed whether concomitant use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) altered the response or safety outcomes to BARI in RA pts and evaluated the effect of concomitant corticosteroid use on the efficacy of BARI.

Methods Pts with ≥6 swollen and tender joints and no prior biologic DMARD use were enrolled. In RA-BEAM (NCT01710358), methotrexate (MTX)-inadequate responder (IR) pts were randomised to PBO once daily (QD), BARI 4 mg QD, or adalimumab 40 mg biweekly.1 In RA-BUILD (NCT01710358), csDMARD-IR pts were randomised to placebo (PBO) or BARI (2 or 4 mg) QD.2 Pts continued background csDMARD (including MTX) therapy. This post-hoc analysis included the PBO (N=716) and BARI 4 mg (N=714) pts and assessed the number and type of concomitant csDMARDS and concurrent corticosteroid use.

Results 71%, 21%, and 6% of PBO pts were taking MTX alone, MTX + ≥1 other csDMARD, and non-MTX csDMARDs, respectively; in BARI 4 mg pts, the rates were 74%, 18%, and 6%, respectively. Oral corticosteroids were used in 56% of PBO and 55% of BARI pts at baseline; pts continued use throughout the studies. The differences in clinical efficacy between BARI 4 mg and PBO at 12 weeks was similar regardless of the number or type of csDMARDs concomitantly used (Table) or the concomitant use of corticosteroids (data not shown). The rates of serious adverse events and discontinuation due to adverse events were comparable regardless of the number or type of csDMARDs used (Table) or corticosteroid use.

Table 1.

Efficacy and Safety Through 12 Weeks Based on Concomitant csDMARD Usage

ACR20/50/70=20%, 50%, and 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria; csDMARDs=conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; DAS28-ESR=Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate; MTX=methotrexate; SDAI=Simple Disease Activity Index.

Conclusions BARI has demonstrated clinical safety and efficacy in a wide range of pts, regardless of the number of concomitant csDMARDs or concomitant use of corticosteroids.

References

  1. Taylor PC et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67(S10):3927–3928.

  2. Dougados M et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:88–95.

References

Disclosure of Interest A. Kavanaugh Consultant for: Eli Lilly and Company, C. Helt Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, D. Muram Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, J. Alam Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, V. Arora Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, A. L. Pinto Correia Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, I. de la Torre Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, R. van Vollenhoven Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, GSK, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Consultant for: Abbvie, Biotest, BMS, Celgene, Crescendo, GSK, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Vertex

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.