Article Text

PDF
AB1097 Patients' experiences of remote monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis using a smartphone app
  1. L Austin1,
  2. C Sanders1,
  3. W Dixon2
  1. 1Centre for Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
  2. 2Arthritis UK Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background The care of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is guided by monitoring changes in disease activity. However, whilst a number of patient-related outcome measures (PROMS) exist1, they are not collected on an on-going basis. Consequently, there are few objective measurements of disease activity, between clinic visits, to inform treatment decisions. In response to this, the REMORA study (REmote MOnitoring of Rheumatoid Arthritis) is developing a smartphone app, to capture data on disease activity and integrate it directly into the electronic patient record. The project explores whether on-going collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROS) between clinic visits can enhance clinical care, support patient self-management, and provide a sustainable source of data for research.

Objectives To describe patients' experiences of remote monitoring of their disease activity, and the perceived value in relation to clinical consultations and self-management.

Methods A diverse sample of 20 patients with RA entered data into the app over a three month period in response to daily, weekly and monthly question sets (table 1). An optional diary component was included, but not integrated into the EPR. The ePROS had been determined during earlier interviews with rheumatology patients, practitioners and researchers.

Qualitative interviews were conducted with patients at the end of the three month period. Interviews explored patients' views on the components of the app, and perceived implications for self-management and clinical care. Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results Qualitative analysis of the data identified a number of themes including; the benefits and limitations of using scales to reflect changes in symptoms experienced, the value of the diary for providing contextual information and an “outlet” for feelings, and the impact the data made to their clinical consultation and self-management.

Overall, the collection of longitudinal data was seen as useful by patients. Successful integration with the EPR allowed data to be displayed graphically during clinical consultations. Reviewing remote monitoring data detected changes which may otherwise have been missed such as flares in disease, or gradual improvements in response to new treatments. Data therefore facilitated “a shared conversation” and decision making around treatment plans.

Additionally, being able to self-reflect on data recorded enabled patients to identify triggers and alleviators in relation to their disease activity and take steps to self-manage their RA; for example, by recognising when they needed to rest as opposed to “just carrying on” when their symptoms were more severe.

Table 1.

ePROS

Conclusions The app was well received by patients and feedback suggests that the ePROS recorded can capture changes in disease activity in a manner that is meaningful to patients and facilitates both clinical consultations and self-management.

References

  1. http://oml.eular.org/Toolbox of Patient Reported Outcomes.

References

Acknowledgements .

Disclosure of Interest None declared

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.