Article Text

AB1077 Does preconsult electronic exchange affect postconsult diagnosis?
  1. G Miller1,
  2. B Chou1,
  3. N Patel2,
  4. G Karpouzas1
  1. 1Division of Rheumatology
  2. 2Department of Internal Medicine, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, United States


Background Harbor UCLA is an urban safety-net hospital in Los Angeles for underserved patients. In 2014, LA County Department of Health Services adopted an electronic consultation (E-consult) referral and dialogue system to improve access to subspecialists in the ambulatory care setting. The E-Consult system provides a platform for primary care providers to ask questions or engage in dialogue with specialists, request consultation, and track submitted requests. Back and forth messaging prior to acceptance for face-to-face consultation is termed a “preconsult exchange”.

Prior studies of E-Consult systems have suggested benefits which include a reduction in wait times compared to paper referrals1 and a perceived improvement in patient care2. We sought to further clarify the effect of a preconsult exchange versus immediate booking on a patient's diagnosis and wait time in an effort to provide some guidance on whether E-Consult should be used as a screening tool to reduce unnecessary visits or as a communication method to clarify details before a face-to-face visit.

Objectives To determine whether preconsult exchange:

1. Influences the odds of arriving at a different diagnosis after face-to-face consultation compared to the requesting provider's original diagnosis

2. Influences the odds of arriving at a diagnosis of a different autoimmune condition versus a non-autoimmune condition (fibromyalgia, primary osteoarthritis, chronic pain, or other non-rheumatologic condition)

3. Results in a significant delay in face-to-face evaluation

Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of all 238 new patient referrals between 11/2014 and 5/2016 to the Harbor UCLA Rheumatology clinic generated through the E-Consult system, reviewed by BC or GM, deemed appropriate, and seen for face-to-face evaluation. These patients were grouped by exposure (Preconsult exchange or not). Odds of change in diagnosis and confidence intervals were calculated using 2x2 contingency tables and Chi-Square tests. A student's T test was used to compare mean number of days between E-Consult initiation and face-to-face appointment.

Conclusions There was a trend towards a change in diagnosis overall among patients for whom there was a preconsult exchange, but a statistically significant increase in odds for change to non-immunologic diagnoses. This suggests that preconsult exchange highlights those patients for whom there is a higher likelihood of a non-immunologic diagnosis.

However, preconsult exchange was associated with a significant time cost - an additional 26 day delay for a face-to-face visit (due to the time needed for both submitter and reviewer to complete their dialogue) in comparison to an immediately booked patient.


  1. Chen A et al. A Safety-Net System Gains Efficiencies Through 'eReferrals' To Specialists. Health Affairs 29, no.5 (2010):969–971.

  2. Scheibe MM et al. Efficiency Gains for Rheumatology Consultation Using a Novel Electronic Referral System in a Safety-Net Health Setting. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Aug;67(8):1158–63.


Disclosure of Interest None declared

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.