Article Text

PDF
AB1043 Rheumatoid factor isotypes – still an useful tool in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis?
  1. M Guerra1,
  2. R Vieira1,
  3. AP Cruz2,
  4. T Videira1,
  5. P Pinto1
  1. 1Department of Rheumatology
  2. 2Department of Clinical Pathology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal

Abstract

Background Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) are key serologic markers in the diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) included in the 2010 ACR/EULAR diagnostic criteria. Determination by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) allows RF isotypes' quantification (IgG, IgA and IgM), improving diagnostic accuracy 1,2.

Objectives To assess the clinical value of RF-IgG/IgA/IgM (ELISA) in the diagnosis of RA, in comparison to RF-IgM (nephelometry).

Methods A population of RA outpatients fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR diagnostic criteria was cross-sectionally evaluated. Data on demographic and clinical characteristics was collected. RF-IgG / IgA / IgM (ELISA, Orgentec®), RF-IgM (nephelometry, Siemens®) and ACPA-IgG (ELiA, ThermoFisher®) were measured. Values three times or more above the upper limit of normal were considered high-positive (in agreement to 2010 ACR/EULAR diagnostic criteria).

Results A total of 87 patients (70.1% female) were included, with a mean (SD) age of 57.3 (12.29) years. Median time of disease evolution was 6 years, ranging from 0 to 37 years. Erosions were present in 50.6% (N=44). RF-ELISA was positive (at least one isotype increased) in 85.1% (N=74); the most frequent isotype was IgM (70.1%;N=61) and the most frequent combination was IgG, IgA and IgM positivity (46.0%;N=40) (table1). FR-nephelometry and ACPA were positive in 58.6% (N=51) and 47.1% (N=41), respectively.

Comparing the two RF methods, 56.3% (N=49) were both RF-nephelometry and RF-ELISA positive; 28.7% (N=25) were RF-ELISA positive and RF-nephelometry negative, and only 2.3% (N=2) verified the opposite (p=0.001). As for RF high-positivity, 4.6% (N=4) of the 87 patients were only RF-nephelometry high-positive, 9.2% (N=8) only RF-ELISA high-positive and 34.5% (N=30) both high-positive (p<0.001).

In the RF-nephelometry negative population (N=36), ACPA and RF-ELISA were both positive in 11.1% (N=4). Only 8.3% (N=3) were solely ACPA positive and 58.3% (N=21) solely RF-ELISA positive, however without statistical significance.

Considering the ACPA negative population (N=46), 32.6% (N=15) were both RF positive; 45.7% (N=21) were RF-ELISA positive and RF-nephelometry negative and 4.3% (N=2) the opposite, without a statistical significance.

Table 1.

Frequencies of RF-ELISA isotypes' profiles

Conclusions ELISA is superior to nephelometry detecting RF in patients with RA, as also in quantifying high-positive values.

References

  1. Routine measurement of IgM, IgG, and IgA rheumatoid factors: high sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for rheumatoid arthritis. Swedler W, Wallman J, Froelich CJ, Teodorescu M. J Rheumatol, 1997 Jun;24(6):1037–44.

  2. Is rheumatoid factor still a superior test for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis? Singh U, Vishwanath A, Verma PK et al. Rheumatol int, 2010 June; 30(8):1115–9.

References

Disclosure of Interest None declared

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.