Background The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a widely used patient reported outcome for functional disability measurement in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) have previously been calculated based on the original ordinal HAQ-DI scores resulting in a dependence of the MCIDs on baseline scores (1). This causes limited generalizability and validity of the proposed MCIDs. The Rasch measurement model provides a transformation of these ordinal scores to an underlying latent scale with interval scale properties. This requires adequate fit of HAQ-DI data to the model.
Objectives 1) To examine the internal construct validity of the Danish version of the HAQ-DI (scored without correction for devices) and 2) to determine a MCID of the HAQ-DI in a cohort of RA patients initiating anti-rheumatic treatment in clinical practice based on the transformed linear logit scale of the HAQ-DI.
Methods RA patients registered in the DANBIO registry at the out-patient clinic at Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen, Denmark were included in the study if HAQ-DI and Patient Global Visual Analogue Scores (PtGl) scores were available at a baseline visit and after > three months of follow-up after initiation of a) first synthetic Disease Modifying Anti Rheumatic Drug (sDMARD) (if disease duration <12 months) or 2) first biological drug (if disease duration >12 months). The Rasch model was fitted to HAQ-DI data at baseline and follow-up and item fit evaluated in separate analyses by comparing observed and expected item-restscore correlations (2). MCID was calculated as the median changes of A) the original and B) logit HAQ-DI score in the group of patients who had improved by 15–30 mm (ie. minimal improvement) on a 0–100 mm PtGl scale.
Results 362 RA patients were included in the study (Table 1). HAQ-DI data showed acceptable fit to the Rasch model as no significant evidence of misfit was disclosed at the first time-point and only a single misfitting item (the “Grip” sub-item, p=0.01) was identified at the second time-point. Consistent item ranking across time indicated instrument invariance. Changes in ordinal and logit HAQ-DI scores were strongly correlated (Spearmans rho =0.935, p<0.001), but the association between them is not completely linear. Sixty-one patients had an improvement > MCID on the logit scale (0.48), but no improvement on the ordinal scale (MCID 0.250), while no patients had the opposite pattern.
Conclusions The Danish version of the HAQ-DI scored without correcting for devices showed acceptable internal construct validity and thus a MCID based on a linear transformed scale could be calculated for this study (0.48). Application of the logit MCID classified an additional 17% of patients as having achieved a MCID compared to the MCID calculated on the ordinal scale. This finding has potential implications for the use of ordinal-based MCID and the powering of future studies.
Doganay Erdogan B, Leung YY, Pohl C, Tennant A, Conaghan PG. J Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;43(1):194–202
Kreiner S. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 2011;35(7):557–561.
Disclosure of Interest None declared
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.