Article Text

SAT0454 Relationship Between Trabecular Bone Score and Bone Mineral Density in Systemic Sclerosis
  1. G. Botticella,
  2. S. Paolino,
  3. A. Casabella,
  4. D. Fasciolo,
  5. B. Seriolo,
  6. M. Cutolo
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Research Laboratory and Academic Unit of Rheumatology, University Of Genoa, Genoa, Italy


Background Patients affected by Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) present an increased risk of osteoporosis or osteopenia and fractures as a result of many factors including chronic inflammatory state, malabsorption, low vitamin D levels, physical inactivity (1). The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) is a index extracted from the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) that provides an indirect measurement of bone axial microarchitecture and allows to get informations about bone quality (2).

Objectives The aim of this study is to investigate bone quality using TBS in SSc patients according to their different nailfold videocapillaroscopic (NVC) patterns of microangiopathy (“Early”, “Active”, “Late”) in order to evaluate the possible association between BMD and TBS.

Methods 74 female postmenopausal patients (mean age 65±9 years) affected by SSc (“early” n=16, “active” n=12 and “late” n=46, NVC pattern) and 60 age-matched healthy controls (mean age 64±11 years) were studied. BMD (g/cm2) of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) was analyzed using DXA scan (Lunar Prodigy). Lumbar spine TBS was derived for each spine DXA examination blinded to clinical parameters and outcomes using TBS iNsight Medimaps (Lunar Prodigy). TBS value >1.350 is considered normal whereas TBS value <1.200 indicates a degraded bone microarchitecture (2) NVC patterns were analyzed according to the previous reported methods (3)

Results BMD was found significantly lower in SSc patients than in matched control group (respectively, Lumbar spine: 0.984±0.191 g/cm2 vs 1.240±0.932 g/cm2; Femoral neck: 0.764±0.212 g/cm2 vs 0.845±0.164 g/cm2; Ward 0.583±0.173 g/cm2 vs 0.657±0.106 g/cm2; Trocanther: 0.666±0.104 g/cm2 vs 0.725±0.143 g/cm2; Total hip: 0.827±0.182 g/cm2 vs 1.033±0.161 g/cm2, all p<0.001). Lumbar spine TBS was found significantly lower in SSc patients than in matched control group (respectively, 1.092±0.163 vs 1.261±0.126, p<0.001). Interestingly, a positive correlation was found between BMD and TBS (Lumbar spine: r=0.4, p<0.01; Femoral neck: r=0.3, p<0.01; Ward: r=0.4, p<0.05; Trocanther: r=0.4 p<0.01; Total hip: r=0.3, p<0.01) in SSc patients. In particular, decreased BMD and TBS were found in “late” SSc patients vs “early”/“active” patients (Lumbar spine 0.892±0.142 g/cm2 vs 1.122±0.205 g/cm2; Femoral neck: 0.647±0.241 g/cm2 vs 0.775±0.243 g/cm2; Ward 0.596±0.141 g/cm2 vs 0.673±0.138 g/cm2; Trocanther: 0.641±0.115 g/cm2 vs 0.763±0.135 g/cm2; Total hip: 0.696±0.160 g/cm2 vs 0.791±0.164 g/cm2; TBS 1.121±0.121 VS 1.29±0.103 all p<0.01)

Conclusions This detailed study shows a decreased BMD and TBS value in SSc patients when compared to healthy controls. In addition TBS, evaluated at the lumbar spine, with lumbar and femoral BMD, could discriminate patients with alterated bone microstructure and could become a new clinical tool in the general diagnosis of osteoporosis. In particular, the association with the “late” NVC scleroderma pattern of microvascular damage, may suggest that low vascular perfusion related to microangiopathy probably might further influence bone mass and quality of skeleton.


  1. Cutolo M et al. Autoimmun Rev 2011;12:84-87.

  2. Roux JP et al. Osteoporosis Int 2013; 24(9):2455-60.

  3. Cutolo M et al. J Rheumatol 2000; 27 (1):155-60

Disclosure of Interest None declared

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.