Article Text

PDF
THU0599 Validation of the Dutch-Flemish Promis Pain Behavior and Pain Interference Item Banks in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
  1. M.H. Crins1,
  2. C.B. Terwee2,
  3. R. Westhovens3,4,
  4. D. van Schaardenburg5,
  5. N. Smits6,
  6. J. Joly3,4,
  7. P. Verschueren3,4,
  8. K. Van der Elst3,4,
  9. D. Cella7,
  10. K.F. Cook7,
  11. J. Dekker8,
  12. M. Boers2,9,
  13. L.D. Roorda1
  1. 1Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center  Reade
  2. 2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  3. 3Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven
  4. 4Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  5. 5Jan van Breemen Research Institute  Reade
  6. 6Department of Clinical Psychology and Department of Methodology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  7. 7Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
  8. 8Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center
  9. 9Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

Background In the assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) it is important to measure pain behavior and pain interference. The National Institutes of Health's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative developed item banks for measuring pain behavior and pain interference. These PROMIS item banks were translated into Dutch-Flemish language according to the FACIT methodology.

Objectives The aim of current study was to validate the Dutch-Flemish translation of the PROMIS Pain Behavior (DF-PROMIS-PB) and Pain Interference (DF-PROMIS-PI) item banks in Dutch and Flemish RA patients.

Methods 826 Dutch and 618 Flemish RA patients completed a paper-and-pencil or web-based survey, including the full DF-PROMIS-PB (39 items, 6-point Likert scale) and DF-PROMIS-PI (40 items, 5-point Likert scale). One-factor confirmatory factor analysis assessed unidimensionality. Item response theory (IRT) models evaluated the item characteristics of the two item banks, to facilitate future development of computer adaptive tests (CAT). A graded item response model (GRM) was fitted and construct validity was studied. Ordinal regression models evaluated Differential Item Functioning (DIF) for e.g. language (Dutch-Flemish vs. English and Dutch vs. Flemish), to analyse cross-cultural validity.

Results Current analyses support unidimensionality of the DF-PROMIS-PB and DF-PROMIS-PI (CFI=0.975;0.997 respectively and TLI=0.974;0.997 respectively). The first factor accounted for 49% (DF-PROMIS-PB) respectively 81% (DF-PROMIS-PI) of the questionnaire variance. Thirteen out of 741 (1.8%) DF-PROMIS-PB item pairs and 20 out of 780 (2.6%) DF-PROMIS-PI item pairs were marked as possibly locally dependent. The data of the two item banks fit the GRM, and showed good coverage across the pain behavior and pain interference continuum. Further analyses of the DF-PROMIS-PB and the DF-PROMIS-PI are in progress and will be presented at the conference.

Conclusions The first results indicate that the items of the DF-PROMIS-PB and the DF-PROMIS-PI fit a GRM and demonstrate good coverage across the range of the pain behavior and pain interference domain. The interim conclusion is that the DF-PROMIS-PB and DF-PROMIS-PI can be used to develop a CAT for measuring pain behavior and pain interference in Dutch and Flemish RA patients.

Disclosure of Interest None declared

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.