Article Text

PDF
OP0245-PARE Helping Patients to Make Informed Decisions. The Pare Guide to Disseminate Eular Recommendations Among Patients
  1. M. De Wit1,
  2. M. Bakker1,
  3. L. van Bodegom-Vos2,
  4. M. Buch3,
  5. N. Caeyers4,
  6. A. Carluccio5,
  7. R. Geenen6,
  8. R. Greiff7,
  9. B. Glüsing8,
  10. L. Gossec9,
  11. A. Kent10,
  12. I. Poldema11,
  13. T. Vliet Vlieland2,
  14. D. Wiek12,
  15. K. Schipper1
  1. 1Metamedica, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam
  2. 2Leiden Univeristy Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
  3. 3Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
  4. 4Patient research partner, EULAR standing committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Mol, Belgium
  5. 5Patient research partner, EULAR standing committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Bari, Italy
  6. 6Clinical and Health Psychology, University Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
  7. 7Reumatikerforbundet, Stockholm, Sweden
  8. 8EULAR standing committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
  9. 9Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France
  10. 10EULAR standing committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), London, United Kingdom
  11. 11Patient research partner, EULAR standing committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Tallinn, Estonia
  12. 12Patient research partner, EULAR standing committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Dusseldorf, Germany

Abstract

Background Accurate patient information is necessary to make informed health decisions. However, the traditional, scientific wording of professional recommendations is often difficult to understand for lay people.

Objectives To develop a practical guide for patient organizations and health professionals to promote the dissemination of EULAR recommendations among patients.

Methods We conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of effective and feasible dissemination strategies to inform and educate patients about recommendations or guidelines. Two task force meetings took place to discuss the outcomes of the SLR and to develop a set of “points to consider” (i.e., advice based on literature and expert opinion) when developing and disseminating recommendations among patients. The task force comprised 7 patient representatives, 3 rheumatologists, 3 health professionals and 1 implementation specialist from 8 European countries.

Results The SLR showed that high quality studies on the effectiveness of dissemination strategies as well as the barriers for implementing a strategic dissemination approach are scarce. Out of 3143 unique publications only 12 studies could be included for review. These showed that a dissemination plan, written at the start of the recommendation development process, involvement of patients in this development process and the use of a combination of traditional and innovative dissemination tools, are key facilitators for success. These SLR findings have been used to write a practical guide for the development, translation, adaptation and dissemination of EULAR recommendations among patients and patient organisations. The booklet can be used by patient organisations and health professionals and contains suggestions, best practices and checklists to start the dissemination process.

Conclusions PARE produced a practical guide for disseminating recommendations among patients. In the coming year the guide will be used in a EULAR project about the dissemination of EULAR recommendations for glucocorticoid treatment in rheumatic diseases and a workshop at the PARE conference.

Disclosure of Interest None declared

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.