Article Text

PDF
SAT0335 Use of Monotherapy Anti-TNF Agents in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients from the Rhumadata® Registry: 8-Year Comparative Effectiveness of Adalimumab, Etanercept and Infliximab
  1. D. Choquette1,
  2. J.-P. Raynauld1,
  3. L. Bessette2,
  4. I. Fortin3,
  5. B. Haraoui1,
  6. J.-P. Pelletier1,
  7. D. Sauvageau1,
  8. E. Villeneuve1,
  9. L. Coupal1
  1. 1Rhumatologie, Institut de rhumatologie de Montréal, Montréal
  2. 2Rhumatologie, Centre d'ostéoporose et de rhumatologie de Québec, Québec
  3. 3Rhumatologie, Centre de rhumatologie de l'est du Québec, Rimouski, Canada

Abstract

Background Anti-TNF agents namely adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETA) and infliximab (INF) are approved for the treatment of signs and symptoms of ankylosing spondylitis. Their efficacy has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials against placebo. They have also been shown effective in the treatment of extra-articular features such as enthesitis, inflammatory bowel entities such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis and uveitis. Antibodies and soluble receptors may have a different efficacy profile.

Objectives To assess the retention rates of adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETA) and infliximab (INF) in patients diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and to compare patient reported response over time.

Methods Data of AS patients who had been prescribed adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETA) or infliximab (INF) in monotherapy on or after January 1st 2004 was extracted. Baseline demographics included age, gender, disease duration, HAQ-DI, fatigue and pain visual analog scale evaluations (VAS), morning stiffness, BASDAI, BASFI, ASDAS and HLA-B27. Eight-year drug retention rates were estimated and compared using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. BASDAI improvement over time was assessed using proportional hazard model adjusted for age and disease duration at TNF initiation. Other differential measures of effectiveness were tested using general linear models (GLM). For these analyses, patients with baseline BASDAI of 4 or more were included. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.3. RHUMADATA® is a clinical database and registry used in daily clinical practice at the IRM and CORQ.

Results Data from 170 patients diagnoses with AS was extracted and no significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between treatment groups except for age and disease duration. The 8-year retention rate of ADA, ETA and INF were 62%, 55% and 54% respectively and were not statistically different (Log-Rank p=0.90). Seventy-five patients were used to analyse time required to reach a BASDAI of 2 and compare rates of response. At baseline, ADA, ETA and INF BASDAI were 6.6, 6.2, 6.5 respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio for reaching a BASDAI of two was found to be 0.77 (95% CI = [0.32, 1.87]) and 0.92 (95% CI = [0.40, 2.14]) when comparing ETA and INF to ADA respectively. Overall 42%, 61% and 64% of ADA, ETA and INF patients reached a target BASDAI of 2 in average adjusted times of 9.6, 19.0 and 15.6 months (p-value=0.31).

Conclusions Monotherapy with adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab in AS patients show similar 8-years retention rates and similar improvement in BASDAI. They all represent good options for the treatment of AS in monotherapy.

Acknowledgements The Rhumadata registry is supported by unrestricted grant from Abbvie Canada, Amgen Canada, BMS Canada, Pfizer Canada, Roche Canada

Disclosure of Interest None declared

DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.1895

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.