Article Text

PDF
SAT0243 Impact of Concomitant Methotrexate on the Enhanced Clinical Efficacy of Abatacept after 24 Weeks in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
  1. N. Takahashi1,
  2. T. Kojima,
  3. K. Funahashi,
  4. M. Hanabayashi,
  5. S. Hirabara,
  6. S. Asai,
  7. N. Ishiguro
  8. on behalf of TBCR Study Group
  1. Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan

Abstract

Background Abatacept (ABT), a selective co-stimulation modulator, is the first in a new class of biologic agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that inhibits T cell activation by binding to CD80/86, and modulating its interaction with CD28. Although some reports demonstrated that concomitant methotrexate (MTX) had little enhancing effect on short-term clinical efficacy of ABT [1,2], there have been only few long-term studies.

Objectives We studied whether background MTX treatment enhanced the ABT efficacy after 24 weeks, by using data from Japanese multicenter registry system for RA patients using biological DMARDs.

Methods All RA patients who underwent ABT treatment for at least 52 weeks (n=254) in Nagoya University Hospital and 12 other institutes (Tsurumai Biologics Communication Registry Study Group [2]) were enrolled in this study. Demographic data and the following parameters of disease activity were collected; tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) on 28 joints, patient global assessment (VAS), ESR, and serum CRP and MMP-3 levels at baseline, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks. We compared these clinical data between the patients treated without concomitant MTX (ABT-mono, n=130) and those treated with concomitant MTX (ABT-MTX, n=124, mean MTX dose of 7.4 mg/week). The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used in each analysis.

Results In the baseline characteristic data, the ABT-mono group had higher pulmonary comorbidity rate (21.5 vs 6.5%, p=0.001) compared to the ABT-MTX group while no other clinical parameters showed significant difference including the proportion of patients with previous biological DMARDs history (47.7 vs 47.6, p=0.986) or the all disease activity indices such as DAS28 (4.48 and 4.54). As shown in Fig. 1, top panels, the ABT-MTX group demonstrated statistically significant decreasing of DAS28 from 24 to 52 weeks while no difference in the ABT-mono group. We next studied the patients that still adhered on ABT therapy in spite of their poor clinical efficacy (moderate or high disease activity, DAS28-CRP >2.7) at 24 weeks. Logistic regression analysis identified the concomitant MTX therapy and female as independent predictors of DAS28 category improvement (e.g. high to moderate disease activity) from 24 to 52 weeks (Fig. 1, bottom panel).

Conclusions Concomitant MTX therapy significantly decreased the disease activity after 24 weeks, while it seemed not to have enhancing effect on short-term clinical efficacy of ABT. It is true that the ABT efficacy is still significant even in the patients without MTX usage. However, it would be beneficial to use concomitant MTX in most of RA patients without serious comorbidity for MTX usage.

References

  1. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65:718.

  2. Mod Rheumatol. 2013;23:904.

Disclosure of Interest None declared

DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2346

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.