Background The detection of sub-clinical synovial inflammation (“silent synovitis”) would be of critical importance for the detection of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) & other inflammatory arthritides, in its earliest pathophysiological stage (”pre-RA”). It has been suggested that ultrasound (US) with power or colour Doppler, can be a useful technology to achieve this. Ultrasound however, requires specially trained/skilled operators. Fluorescence optical imaging (FOI, “Rheumascan”) is a novel imaging modality based on the use of an intravenous fluorescence dye, that allows imaging of the hands & wrists, with increased focal optical signal intensities in areas of high perfusion &/or capillary leakage. This diagnostic tool, is operator independent, & can be well carried out by a rheumatology nurse.
Objectives Here, we investigated whether FOI (Rheumascan) could be used in lieu of US (colour Doppler) for ascertaining hand & wrist sub-clinical synovitis.
Methods A total of 748 hand & wrist joints (6 wrist, 10 MCPs, 10 PIPs & 8 DIPs) in 22 patients (7 male & 15 female), aged between 19 & 84 years, with inflammatory arthritis (RA:9, JIA, polyarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, SLE & other diagnoses, 1-2 each) were examined clinically, by US & FOI. Joints were considered clinically inflamed when both swollen and tender, & non-inflamed otherwise. Ultrasound was considered positive for “active” synovitis if both thickening on grey scale & Doppler signals were present. FOI was considered positive in joints that displayed focal signal intensities, by visual inspection of recorded images & video clips.
Results Out of 748 joints evaluated, 72 (10%) were considered inflamed by clinical examination and 676 (90%) were not. Of the clinically non-inflamed joints, exactly 95 (14%) were inflamed by US. Of these joints, 72 (76%) were inflamed by FOI and 23 (24%) were not. Thus, the sensitivity of FOI for detecting clinically “silent” synovitis when defined as a positive US in the absence of clinical inflammation was 76%. Out of the 581 joints that were non-inflamed clinically and non-inflamed by ultrasound, 24 (4%) had inflammation by FOI, yielding a specificity of 96% (557/581).
Conclusions Under the assumption that US can correctly identify sub-clinical synovitis in clinically non-inflamed joints (using the combination of clinical examination & US as the “gold standard”), the sensitivity of FOI for detecting clinically “silent synovitis” in the hands & wrists is 76% and the specificity 95%. These metrics suggest that it may be a useful diagnostic tool in the setting of identifying patients with very early synovial inflammation of the hands &/or wrists.
Acknowledgements To all the patients & participants of the study.
Disclosure of Interest None declared
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.