Article Text


Extended report
Anaemia may add information to standardised disease activity assessment to predict radiographic damage in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective cohort study
  1. Burkhard Möller1,
  2. Almut Scherer2,
  3. Frauke Förger1,
  4. Peter M Villiger1,
  5. Axel Finckh3,
  6. on behalf of the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Program for Rheumatic Diseases
  1. 1Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  2. 2SCQM Office Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  3. 3Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Burkhard Möller, Department for Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstraße, Bern 3010, Switzerland; burkhard.moeller{at}


Objective Anaemia in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is prototypical of the chronic disease type and is often neglected in clinical practice. We studied anaemia in relation to disease activity, medications and radiographic progression.

Methods Data were collected between 1996 and 2007 over a mean follow-up of 2.2 years. Anaemia was defined according to WHO (♀ haemoglobin<12 g/dl, ♂: haemoglobin<13 g/dl), or alternative criteria. Anaemia prevalence was studied in relation to disease parameters and pharmacological therapy. Radiographic progression was analysed in 9731 radiograph sets from 2681 patients in crude longitudinal regression models and after adjusting for potential confounding factors, including the clinical disease activity score with the 28-joint count for tender and swollen joints and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28ESR) or the clinical disease activity index (cDAI), synthetic antirheumatic drugs and antitumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy.

Results Anaemia prevalence decreased from more than 24% in years before 2001 to 15% in 2007. Erosions progressed significantly faster in patients with anaemia (p<0.001). Adjusted models showed these effects independently of clinical disease activity and other indicators of disease severity. Radiographic damage progression rates were increasing with severity of anaemia, suggesting a ‘dose-response effect’. The effect of anaemia on damage progression was maintained in subgroups of patients treated with TNF blockade or corticosteroids, and without non-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Conclusions Anaemia in RA appears to capture disease processes that remain unmeasured by established disease activity measures in patients with or without TNF blockade, and may help to identify patients with more rapid erosive disease.

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Disease Activity
  • Anti-TNF

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from


Anaemia in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is prototypical of anaemia of chronic disease (ACD), characterised by low serum iron concentrations in conjunction with normal or increased storage iron.1 ACD without functional iron deficiency is normochromic, normocytic, and usually mild.2 Haemoglobin concentrations were a component of earlier RA disease activity measures until they were omitted during validation of the original RA disease activity score (DAS) due to low correlation with other disease activity measures, despite moderate correlation with radiographic outcome.3

The significantly higher need for joint replacements and higher mortality rates in the anaemic patients of the British early RA cohort (ERAS) challenged the concept of causal ACD treatment by aiming at remission only with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).4 Inhibition of human erythroid colony-forming units in the bone marrow downstream of tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)5 and anemia6 is reversible upon TNF-α blockade, even in otherwise refractory RA patients. Here, we question whether anaemia in RA is still relevant in terms of prevalence and clinical consequences in the era of TNF-α blockade, one of the most efficacious and common biological RA treatments.


Patients and setting

This longitudinal population-based cohort study is nested within the Swiss clinical quality management (SCQM) database, which is described elsewhere.7 Patient registration in SCQM is restricted to board-certified rheumatologists to follow the effectiveness and safety of antirheumatic therapies. More than two-thirds of all practicing rheumatologists in Switzerland contributed patients, representing ∼10% of all hypothetical Swiss RA patients.8 ,9 Approximately 60% of patients come from private practices, 20% from university hospitals, and 20% from non-academic centres. Ethical approval for patient enrolment into the SCQM programme and related studies was obtained from the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences review board. Written informed consent was provided by all 4377 participants with classification criteria-guided RA diagnosis,10 and at least one haemoglobin assessment between the start of the registry in 1996 and a major system revision in 2007.

Anaemia definitions

We used the WHO definition of anaemia with lower normal haemoglobin limits of 12 g/dl in women and 13 g/dl in men.11 To explore the effect of anaemia severity, we used the less stringent anaemia definition proposed by Beutler et al,12 using thresholds of 12.2 g/dl in white women and of 13.7 g/dl or 13.2 g/dl in white men aged 20–59 years, or 60+ years, respectively, in sensitivity analyses. ‘More severe anaemia’ was arbitrarily defined (in the absence of official definitions) by haemoglobin levels lower than 11 g/dl in women and 12 g/dl in men. Haemoglobin concentrations, white blood cell counts, and platelet counts were derived from certified local laboratories.


Registry documentation provided the American College of Rheumatology core set of disease activity measures,13 which allowed to calculate the DAS including the 28-joint count for tender and swollen joints and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28ESR)14 and the clinical disease activity index (cDAI).15 Other covariates were age and gender, rheumatoid factor (RF) status, and RA disease duration. RA therapies, including TNF-α blockers, methotrexate with or without folic acid supplementation, and other synthetic DMARDs, corticosteroids, cyclo-oxygenase-II selective (Coxib type) NSAIDs, non-selective NSAIDs and proton-pump inhibitors (PPI). Generic information on the presence of haematological, renal, or gastrointestinal comorbidities was also available, without detailed information.


Radiographic evaluation of erosions was centrally performed by an independent assessor following the Ratingen score, a validated method measuring quintiles of the total joint bone surface in 38 joints in the hands and forefeet.16 Radiographic data were expressed in percent of the maximal 190-point score and changes over time reported in absolute differences. The minimal detectable change for this method is ∼3.3% of the maximum score.17

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics included the mean and SD for normally distributed variables, and the median and IQR for non-parametric continuous variables. Sporadic missing covariates were replaced by the population mean (<5%). Between-group differences in disease characteristics from baseline to registration were compared using a Student t test for normally distributed variables, the Wilcoxon rank sum test for non-normally distributed continuous variables, and Pearson's χ2 test for dichotomous variables. We examined potential time trends in the prevalence and incidence of anaemia and the haemoglobin normalisation rates with Cox regression analyses. Patients were defined as ‘anaemic’ according to the chosen definition between two radiographs by subnormal haemoglobin concentrations in more than 50% of determinations. We used mixed-model random-slope regression for longitudinal data to analyse radiographic damage progression over time. Unless otherwise stated, data were adjusted for all baseline covariates (table 1) and the baseline and time-varying DAS28ESR or cDAI.14 ,15 Patients may have switched between the anaemic and non-anaemic groups according to their time-dependent haemoglobin concentration. We chose the best-fitting parsimonious covariance structure using a series of likelihood ratio tests based on restricted maximum likelihood estimates. We examined whether time best fit the data as a linear trend or as a quadratic function. Finally, we selected the best-fitting mean response model of the outcome, controlling for other covariates for the respective outcome. All statistical tests were two-sided performed with Stata V.12 for Windows (Stata Statistical Software, StataCorp, Texas, USA), and were evaluated at the 0.05 significance level.

Table 1

Baseline patient characteristics (n=4377) according to anaemia status at inclusion

Subgroup analyses

Subgroups were analysed in order to further address potential treatment effects. Here, we performed statistical models for the radiographic outcome after having selected either patients with anti-TNF-therapy (n=1020 patients) or without NSAIDs (n=1477), which resulted in an overlap of 520 patients for both analyses. Additional subgroup analyses were run in 1424 patients with and in 1257 subjects without corticosteroid therapy, and in 1115 patients with successful therapy as indicated by DAS28ESR defined remission at final observation.


Baseline characteristics of all included patients are listed in table 1. More than 80% of subsequent consultations were scheduled after approval of TNF-α blocking agents in Switzerland for patients after failure of at least one conventional DMARD. Anti-TNF-α and other DMARD therapies were often intensified after inclusion, and the prevalence of TNF-α inhibitors and second-line biologics progressively reached 35% and 2% of patients, respectively. Use of methotrexate or other conventional DMARDs was registered at least once in 64% and 60% of the patients, respectively, over time.

Haemoglobin concentrations

Patients had a mean of 4.4 haemoglobin assessments over a mean follow-up period of 2.8 years. The mean baseline haemoglobin concentration was 12.7 (SD±1.4 g/dl) in women and 14.0±1.6 g/dl in men. Haemoglobin levels increased by 0.08±0.04 g/dl (p=0.04) after the first year, by 0.14±0.07 g/dl (p=0.06) after the second year, and by 0.16±0.09 g/dl (p=0.077) after the third year. Individual haemoglobin fluctuations in either direction (mean 1.6±1.2 g/dl) were more substantial. Higher haemoglobin concentrations were significantly associated with higher haemoglobin concentrations at baseline (0.04, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.05, p<0.001) and male gender (1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19, p<0.001), but negatively associated with higher DAS28ESR (−0.20 g/dl, 95% CI −0.23 to −0.18, p<0.001), higher erosion scores (−0.005, 95% CI −0.007 to −0.003, p<0.001), and treatment with non-selective NSAIDs (−0.16, 95% CI −0.20 to −0.12, p<0.001), with or without PPI cotherapy. Haemoglobin levels were not associated with baseline renal or gastrointestinal comorbidity.

Prevalence of anaemia

Anemia11 occurred with similar frequency in men and women, oscillating around 24%, before a continuous negative time trend started in 2001 to reach 14.7% in 2007. No anaemia at any visit was found in 69.2% of patients, and persistent anaemia at all visits occurred in 10% of patients.

Incidence and correction of anaemia

The annual anaemia incidence rate was 7.6% in 2531 initially non-anaemic patients. Patients with higher baseline DAS28ESR (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.22, p<0.001), RF positivity (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.92, p=0.002), registered haematological comorbidity (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.53, p=0.002) or corticosteroid therapy (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.67, p=0.028) became significantly more often anaemic. PPI comedication was often used in incident anaemia (HR 2.63, 95% CI 0.97 to 7.14, p=0.057) among patients with non-selective NSAID therapy (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.57, p=0.013). By contrast, coxibs, gastrointestinal comorbidities or renal comorbidities were not associated with different anaemia incidence. Gastrointestinal toxicities were attributed to NSAIDs in 12 cases, but only one clinically manifest bleeding was reported. Haemoglobin concentrations normalised after a median of 1.3 (IQR: 0.9–3.2) years in 800 initially anaemic patients.11 Anaemia correction was slower in patients with reported haematological disorder (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.75, p<0.001) or under non-selective NSAIDs (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89, p=0.002), but was accelerated after anti-TNF-α (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.45, p=0.028) or PPI therapy (HR 7.77, 95% CI 1.86 to 32.39, p=0.005).

Reporting of anaemia and haematological comorbidities

Treating rheumatologists reported baseline haematological comorbidity in only 19% of anaemic patients. Indicators of bone marrow insufficiency or other relevant blood cell abnormalities (white blood cell count below 3 g/l and thrombocytopenia below 50 g/l were reported in less than 0.4% or less than 0.2% of all cases, respectively. Reactive elevations in these blood cell counts, platelets ≥400 g/l (3.6%), or leukocytes ≥10 g/l (13.8%) were more frequent. Patient`s treatment with iron, vitamin B12, or erythropoietin was reported in nine, 15 and 14 cases, respectively. Malignancies were reported in 1.3% of all patients.

Anaemia and erosions

This relationship was studied in 9731 sets of radiographs from hands and forefeet in 2681 patients, of whom 627 individuals were anaemic at baseline according to WHO definition. The less stringent anaemia definition12 was fulfilled in 1487 individuals, and 506 patients complied with the definition of ‘more severe anaemia’. In crude analyses and after statistical adjustments for potential confounding baseline parameters and the time-dependent DAS28ESR or cDAI, anaemic patients experienced significantly faster radiographic progression (p<0.001) than their non-anaemic counterparts, irrespective of the employed anaemia definition (figure 1). A ‘dose-response effect’ was suggested by the average 2.0% annual damage progression of the maximal score in WHO-defined anaemic patients versus 1.2% in non-anaemic patients; these values were 1.4% vs 1.1% according to the higher threshold of normal haemoglobin concentrations,12 but 2.4% vs 1.2% according to the definition of ‘more severe anaemia’. Significant baseline determinants of radiographic progression in all these statistical models were baseline erosion scores (mean ∼1.0 in all models, p<0.001), gender to the advantage of the male (mean 0.3–0.4%, dependent on the model, p=0.024–0.038), methotrexate therapy (mean 0.2–0.3% p=0.012–0.043), and non-selective NSAID therapy (mean ∼0.3% in all models, p=0.013–0.024).

Figure 1

Erosive progression over time in all 2681 evaluable rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Progression trajectories were adjusted for differences in patient characteristics at their first x-ray (table 1), (A,C) DAS including the 28-joint count for tender and swollen joints and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28ESR) or (B,D) clinical disease activity index where indicated, plus anti-inflammatory therapies and covariates of RA severity. Values are mean and 95% CI. Erosion scores progressed significantly faster in patients with anaemia than in non-anaemic RA patients. The kinetics of damage progression accelerated with the grade of anaemia severity. (A and C) For comparison, the lower margin of the shaded area represents mean damage progression in clinical remission (DAS28ESR<2.6), and the upper margin disease progression in patients with high clinical disease activity (DAS28ESR>5.1). Patient numbers at given time points are the same in left (A,C) and right hand figures (B,D).

Subgroup analyses

We obtained similar results as in the total patient population after exclusion of patients with non-selective NSAID therapy (figure 2A,B). Anaemia effects on erosive progression were reproduced in another independently selected patient population with anti-TNF therapy (figure 2C,D). By contrast with mild anaemia,12 WHO defined11 and ‘more severe anaemia’ exhibited similarly significant effects on x-ray progression (p<0.001) in these subgroups. Anaemia effects on radiographic outcome went insignificant after exclusion of all patients with steroid registration, but remained significant in the complementary population (p<0.001, data not shown). Finally, mean joint damage progression was faster in anaemia after selection of patients with DAS28ESR defined remission at their last observation (p=0.026, data not shown).

Figure 2

Erosive progression over time was analysed in patients with and without anaemia,11 (A,B) without NSAID and (C,D) with antitumour necrosis factor-α therapy. Values are mean and 95% CI. The progression of erosions (mean±95% CI) was adjusted for potential confounders (figure 1, table 1). Patient numbers at given time points are the same in left (A,C) and right hand figures (B,D).


In this study, WHO-defined anaemia was present in approximately every fifth patient at baseline, and at least in every third patient over their observation time, demonstrating ongoing relevance of anaemia despite decreasing time trends. We confirmed that anaemia in RA is usually mild, but still only partially resolved by available therapeutics and of remarkable importance for radiographic outcome.

SCQM services a typical RA registry cohort in terms of RF status, anaemia frequency and severity,18 ,19 other extra-articular RA manifestations,20 comorbidities,21 DMARD and TNF-α blocker prescription rates.22 ,23 SCQM is unique among the national registries in providing centralised radiographic assessment for RA patients. The necessary compromise was the abandonment of the evaluation of joint space narrowing, but the Ratingen erosion score provides good reliability and less susceptibility to ceiling effects in advanced disease, since it uses a true ordinal rating system.16

This large real-life observational study confirmed that mean joint damage progression rates are significantly lower in clinical remission than in active disease, but this goal was achieved at the end of observation in only 30% of patients. Articular inflammation can be detected by ultrasound and MRI in the absence of clinically detectable inflammation,24 which could explain the dissociation of disease activity from radiographic outcome.25–27 In the present study, anaemia-related progression of joint damage was not restricted to the patients with clinically active disease.14 Thus, anaemia may be a useful surrogate for subclinical RA disease activity.

The well established relationship between inflammation and anaemia was confirmed in this study by significant associations between lower haemoglobin concentrations and higher DAS28ESR and by faster haemoglobin normalisation after TNF-α blockade. ACD in RA may be caused by a shortened red blood cell lifespan, pathologic iron homeostasis induced by hepcidin, and blunted response to erythropoietin.1 Interestingly, erythropoietin treatment reduced disease activity in RA patients28 ,29 and tissue damage in collagen-induced arthritis models.30 Our results are consistent with anaemia as an indicator of deficient anti-inflammatory properties of erythropoietin.31 Hepcidin may trigger functional iron deficiency upon induction by TNF-α, interleukin-6, and other inflammatory stimuli,1 resulting in reduced intestinal iron uptake at the mucosal barrier, and iron retention in the reticulo-endothelial system via internalisation of the same exclusive cellular iron exporter ferroportin on both cell types. While elevated hepcidin levels could likewise be controlled by TNF-α blockade and manifest iron deficiency,32 its plasma concentrations appear not to be predictive for RA joint damage.33

The association between anaemia and erosions was not observed in a smaller patient population,34 but in the large ERAS inception cohort, anaemic patients underwent a more aggressive course of joint destruction.2 ,4 The SCQM-RA cohort includes patients with early and established disease, with lower mean disease activity at inclusion than the ERAS cohort, and a substantial proportion of patients received anti-TNF-α therapy, yet the consequences of anaemia on RA outcome appear to be similar in these two populations.3

The present study is limited by missing biological markers of iron deficient erythropoiesis, such as erythrocyte indices or parameters of iron metabolism. Iron-deficiency anaemia is increasing in industrialised countries with age and with risk factors for bleeding,35 as seen here with an increased prevalence and delayed recovery of anaemia in patients taking non-selective NSAIDs, in contrast with Coxib-type NSAIDs.36 One can estimate, on the basis of prevalence data in young Swiss males,15 that iron deficiency contributes to anaemia prevalence in about 30% of the cases before, and in 50% after, market introduction of TNF blockers. With this assumption, the prevalence of deficient erythropoiesis may still be underestimated, as iron deficiency was rapidly uncovered by erythropoietin stimulation in the vast majority of patients with longstanding and treatment-resistant active RA.28 Here, it appears necessary to point out that a higher proportion of similar cases with established disease, no matter of being clinically active on a very short term, but with subsequent functional iron deficiency on a longer time perspective would not be a confounding factor, but support the prognostic value of anaemia assessment.

Observational studies have inherent limitations, such as incomplete data, bias by indication and confounding factors. We do not believe there is a specific selection bias by anaemia in this register, and the most important confounding factors have been measured and could be adjusted for in the analysis. Corticosteroids may carry an increased risk of anaemia due to toxic mucosal drug effects37 or a bias by indication. As increased rates in radiographic damage in association with anaemia were not seen in patients without corticosteroids, this constellation differs from that in NSAID-treated patients. Divergent reporting of haematological conditions and true anaemic haemoglobin levels were explainable by the mild degree in an explained context. Missing adjustments for C-reactive protein concentrations appear less critical with regard to the superior validity of composite scores over single items.3 ,14 We were unable to adjust for anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody status as this information was missing in 40% of patients,38 ,39 nor do not know the shared epitope status in this large cohort, which may control immune responses40 ,41 and determine haematopoietic progenitor cell senescence.42 ,43

In summary, these results indicate that anaemia may serve as predictor of worse outcome in RA patients. Our data suggest that anaemia and erosion progression are associated independently of common disease activity outcome measures. This report may add clinical background to recent discoveries at the nexus of inflammation, haematopoiesis, and iron metabolism,30 ,31 and highlights the clinical implications of anaemia in RA. Diagnosis of anaemia in RA should prompt a thorough search for subclinical disease activity, after exclusion of other frequent causes.


We are grateful to the rheumatologists (listed under and patients who participated in SCQM, thereby making this study possible. We are grateful to Dr Hans Schwarz, head of SCQM from 2004 to 2011, for his ongoing successful and generous efforts, and to Doris Wisler for her valuable contributions to this project. The manuscript was revised in grammar and style by San Francisco Edit writing agency.


View Abstract


  • Handling editor Tore K Kvien

  • Contributors BM planned this study, performed statistical analyses and is responsible for the overall content as guarantor. AS tested the results in alternative statistical models. FF provided important intellectual content to this study. PV provided administrative support. AF gave advice and supervised all statistical procedures. All authors approved the final manuscript. Physicians and institutions who contributed patients to the SCQM registry without fulfilling the requirements for authorship are listed under (

  • Funding This study on SCQM data required no study-specific funding. The SCQM Foundation has received grants from the Swiss Health authorities (BAG), the Swiss Academy for Medical Sciences (SAMW), the JL Warnery Foundation, and the Swiss Society of polyarthritis patients (SPV). The pharmaceutical companies Abbott, Merck (formerly Essex Switzerland), Pfizer (formerly Wyeth Switzerland), Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mepha, Novartis and Sanofi-Aventis are patrons of SCQM. SCQM patrons and sponsors had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of this manuscript, or the decision to submit this manuscript.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences review board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.