Article Text

PDF
OP0033 Classification Criteria for Systemic Sclerosis: Preliminary Results
  1. F. Van Den Hoogen1,
  2. D. Khanna2,
  3. J. Fransen3,
  4. S. R. Johnson4,
  5. M. Baron5,
  6. A. Tyndall6,
  7. M. Matucci7,
  8. R. Naden8,
  9. J. Pope on behalf of all experts committed to the working group for Classification Criteria for SSc9
  1. 1Rheumatology, St Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  2. 2Scleroderma Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  3. 3Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  4. 4Rheumatology, Toronto Western Hospital, Mount Sinai Hospital, and University of Toronto, Toronto
  5. 5Rheumatology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  6. 6Rheumatology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  7. 7Rheumatology, Denothe Centre, Univ Florence, Florence, Italy
  8. 8Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
  9. 9Medicine, St Joseph Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

Abstract

Background The existing 1980 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis (SSc) are suboptimal for patients with early SSc and some patients with limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) where an important subset do not meet those criteria.

Objectives To develop and test new classification criteria for SSc by a joint EULAR and ACR committee.

Methods Delphi exercises and a nominal group technique were used to create a set of potential items for classification of SSc. Twenty cases were prospectively collected to represent the spectrum of SSc (low probability to high probability) which were ranked by SSc experts and conjoint analysis (1000 Minds®) was used to assign weights to the items and reduce the number of items. Experts agreed that all patients with sclerodactyly and scleroderma skin involvement proximal to the MCPs were considered SSc; patients with skin involvement due another scleroderma-like disorder (e.g. scleromyxedema) or skin thickening sparing the fingers were not regarded to have SSc. The provisional classification system was tested in a random sample of SSc cases and controls of 100 from North America and 100 from Europe (derivation sample). The system was simplified and calibrated to real cases. The classification system was re-analyzed in another sample of SSc cases and controls (validation set; n=405).

The table provides the final items with the proposed weights. Only the maximum score in each domain is counted. A cut-off of >= 9 (out of 19) had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 92% in the validation cohort (n=405). The sensitivity and specificity of the former 1980 ARA criteria in this database were 75% and 72%, respectively. These results are preliminary and not yet approved by the organizational sponsors.

Conclusions The preliminary results of the classification criteria for SSc performed better than 1980 Preliminary ARA Criteria for SSc. These criteria can be endorsed for epidemiological studies and clinical trials after approval by ACR and EULAR.

Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.