Article Text

PDF
FRI0462 Inter-observer variation among conventional radiologist, expert radiologist and rheumatologist, in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac (SI) joints in a group of colombian patients with spondyloarthritis (SPA)
  1. J. Londono1,
  2. E. Calvo2,
  3. P. Peña1,
  4. A. M. Santos1,
  5. M. Porras1,
  6. C. Romero-Sanchez3,
  7. W. Bautista4,
  8. S. Segura1,
  9. R. Valle-Oñate4,
  10. Spondylarthritis Group. Division of Rheumatology Hospital Militar Central/Universidad de La Sabana.
  1. 1RHEUMATOLOGY, UNIVERSIDAD DE LA SABANA, Chía
  2. 2Radiology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  3. 3Spondylarthritis Group. Division of Rheumatology, Hospital Militar Central /Universidad de La Sabana./ Universidad del Bosque
  4. 4Spondylarthritis Group. Division of Rheumatology, Hospital Militar Central Universidad de La Sabana, Bogota, Colombia

Abstract

Background The MRI of SI joints, included in the ASAS criteria, is being increasingly used to detect early sacroiliitis and as a tool to measure response to treatment in clinical studies. However, evaluation of the MRI of SI joints has been considered difficult to a non-experienced observer, in which case, Sacroiliitis could be mis diagnosed or delay diagnosis and cost increase.

Objectives To evaluate the concordance rate of detecting abnormalities of sacroiliac joints on MRI, between a musculoskeletal expert observer and conventional radiologist, in a group of patients with SpA

Methods 66 patients with diagnosis of SpA according to the ESSG (European Study Group spondyloarthritis), who were attended to a SpA clinic from January to November of 2012 and their MRI films of SI joints and its originals reports by conventional radiologist were selected. Those images were read independently in a second time by a musculoskeletal expert observer. The agreement between two readers was analyzed through the kappa statistic.

Results The agreement between the two readers (musculoskeletal expert radiologist and conventional radiologist) was poor (K 0.37), on the normal case (K 0.39), and on chronic findings (K0.31), while there was moderate agreement on the presence of acute changes (K 0.45). The agreement between a rheumatologist expert in SpA and a musculoskeletal expert radiologist observer also was analyzed, the agreement was acceptable to be useful in ascertaining acute inflammatory and chronic structural changes due to sacroiliitis (sacroilitis by X-ray K 0,5; acute changes K 0,52, chronic changes K 0,61).

Conclusions Sacroiliitis can be difficult to detect in early stages of SpA. The agreement for changes due to sacroiliitis by MRI between expert and non- expert radiologist in this study was poor, while between two experts readers (Radiologist and Rheumatologist) was better. Although MRI is highly sensitive in detecting early changes according to other studies, these findings may be no detected by non-expert observers, that’s why training of rheumatologists and radiologists in the evaluation of sacroiliac joints on MRI is necessary, to optimize the accuracy of the diagnostic test, avoid mis diagnostic and cost increase.

Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.