Article Text

FRI0220 Sustained clinical efficacy after multiple courses of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: 2-year data from the repeat (repeated courses in routine clinical practice) study
  1. C. Codreanu1,
  2. I. Ancuta2,
  3. R. Ionescu3,
  4. REPEAT Study Investigators Group
  1. 1Rheumatology, “Dr. I. Stoia” Center for Rheumatic Diseases, BUCHAREST
  2. 2Rheumatology, “Dr. I. Cantacuzino” Hospital
  3. 3Rheumatology, “Sfanta Maria” Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania


Background In the last decade, biologic therapy changed dramatically treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, a significant number of patients failed to maintain the initial response to a TNF blocker. More information is needed regarding efficacy and safety of multiple courses of biologics administered over extended periods of time.

Objectives To assess clinical efficacy of subsequent courses with Rituximab (RTX) in patients with moderate-severe active RA despite treatment with a TNF inhibitor in routine clinical practice in Romania.

Methods In this open-label, multicentre, prospective observational study started in 2010, patients were treated with RTX at each 6 months. Clinical efficacy was assessed at baseline and after each retreatment course at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Clinical assessments included DAS-28, SDAI and CDAI. Δ DAS-28, Δ SDAI and Δ CDAI were calculated based on two consecutive evaluations. Statistical analyses: STATA SE 11.0 software, unpaired t-tests and Pearson correlation coefficients R2 in regression analysis (for Δ DAS-28, Δ SDAI and Δ CDAI) and Cuzick non-parametric trend tests across ordered groups (for disease activity state).

Results 943 adult (>18 years) patients with active RA and inadequate response to at least one TNF inhibitor received initial RTX treatment. Median clinical disease activity scores steadily decreased after each retreatment indicating improvement in clinical response:

Conclusions Our study showed a sustained improvement of clinical response after each retreatment course with RTX (at 6 months interval), regardless of assessment tool used (DAS28, SDAI or CDAI). Each RTX course led to an increased and cumulative clinical response versus the previous one with respect to Treat to Target principles and EULAR/ACR recommendations.

Disclosure of Interest: None Declared

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.