Article Text

FRI0112 Influence of methotrexate, anti-tnf and rituximab on the immune response to influenza and pneumococcal vaccines in patients with rheumatoïd arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
  1. C. Hua1,
  2. T. Barnetche2,
  3. B. Combe1,
  4. J. Morel1
  1. 1Service de Rhumatologie, Hopital Lapeyronie, Montpellier
  2. 2Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France


Background Vaccines against influenza and streptococcus pneumonia are currently recommended for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Objectives This meta-analysis assesses current literature data on the impact of methotrexate (MTX), anti-TNF or rituximab (RTX) on the humoral response to pneumococcal and influenza vaccines in RA patients.

Methods Data sources were Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases and ACR 2011 abstracts. To be included, studies had to contain a group of RA patients treated with MTX, anti-TNF or RTX and a control group of RA patients without the treatment of interest. Both groups had to receive either pneumococcal or influenza vaccine. Results had to show rates of responders based on the antibody response ratio, corresponding to the level of antibodies measured at 1 month following vaccination as numerator and the level of antibodies at vaccination as denominator, for pneumococcal serotypes 6B and 23F or one of the 3 influenza strains: H1N1, H3N2 and B. Out of 59 potentially relevant studies, 11 met inclusion criteria. Odds-ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were pooled using the generic inverse variance method. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochran’s Q-test and the I2value, a random effect model was performed if necessary. All analyses were realized with the RevMan software 5.1 version. A significant statistical threshold of 0.05 was used.

Results Following pneumococcal vaccination: response was reduced in patients treated with anti-TNF + MTX compared to those treated with anti-TNF not combined with MTX (pooled odds-ratio (OR)=0.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.94; p=0.03 for 23F and 0.33; 95% CI 0.20-0.54; p<0.0001 for 6B). Rates of responders were similar in patients under MTX alone and those treated with MTX + anti-TNF (OR=1.21; 95% CI 0.83-1.75 for 23F and 0.96; 95% CI 0.57-1.59 for 6B). The immune response was lower in patients treated with RTX, combined in most cases with MTX, than in patients under MTX as monotherapy (OR=0.22; 95% CI 0.11-0.47; p<0.0001 for 23F and 0.25; 95% CI 0.11-0.58; p=0,001 for 6B).

Following influenza vaccination response was reduced in patients receiving MTX more or less other DMARDs compared to patients treated with another DMARD and/or steroïds (OR=0.35; p=0.001 for response to at least 2 strains) but not in patients receiving MTX more or less anti-TNFα and/or other DMARDs compared to patients treated with anti-TNFα and/or other DMARDs (OR=1.36; 95%CI 0.69-2.68 for H1N1, 1.33; 95%CI 0.70-2.53 for H3N2, 1.28; 95%CI 0.64-2.56 for B). Patients treated with anti-TNF, with or without MTX, had same responders rates than patients whose treatment did not include anti-TNF (OR=0.94; 95%CI 0.62-1.45 for H1N1, 0.80; 95%CI 0.52-1.22 for H3N2, 0.73; 95%CI 0.47-1.13 for B). Patients under RTX in monotherapy or in combination with DMARDs had a disminished humoral response compared to patients treated with DMARDs without RTX, significance being reached for H3N2 and B (OR=0.11; 95% CI 0.04-0.31; p<0.0001 and 0.29; 95% CI 0.10-0.81; p=0.02).

Conclusions Immune response to both vaccines is reduced with RTX but not with anti-TNF. MTX decreased immunogenicity of pneumococcal vaccine whereas results about influenza vaccine are less homogeneous but suggest an impairment of the response due to MTX therapy.

Acknowledgements We wish to thank Abbott who provided logistic support in the organisation of sessions about the implementation of a meta-analysis, and remained independent of the collection, analysis and interpretation of data.

Disclosure of Interest C. Hua: None Declared, T. Barnetche Speakers bureau: Roche Chugai, B. Combe Consultant for: Roche, Merck, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Roche, Merck, UCB, Pfizer, J. Morel Grant/research support from: Roche, Pfizer, Consultant for: Roche, Roche Chugai, BMS, UCB, Pfizer, Abbott, Amgen

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.