Article Text

PDF
THU0283 Two Year Follow-Up on Biologics Use in 13 Centers - Data from the International Registry for Biologics in SLE (IRBIS)
  1. R. van Vollenhoven1,
  2. M. Mild1,
  3. S. Jacobsen2,
  4. D. J. Wallace3,
  5. J. G. Hanley4,
  6. M. A. Petri6,
  7. S. R. Bernatsky5,
  8. S.-C. Bae7,
  9. M. Ramos-Casals8,
  10. F. Garcia-Hernandez9,
  11. M. D. M. Ayala-Guiterrez10,
  12. R. Ramsey-Goldman11,
  13. A. Doria12,
  14. M. Mosca13,
  15. for the SLICC group
  1. 1Karolinska Institutet, ClinTRID, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. 2Copenhagen U. Hospital, Copenhangen, Denmark
  3. 3Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, United States
  4. 4Division of Rheumatology, NSRC, Halifax
  5. 5Research Institute of the McGill U. Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
  6. 6John Hopkins U., Baltimore, United States
  7. 7Hanyang U. Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea, Democratic People’s Republic Of
  8. 8Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
  9. 9Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Solomon Islands
  10. 10Hosptial Carlos Haya, Malaga, Spain
  11. 11Northwestern U., Chicago, United States
  12. 12U. of Padova, Padova
  13. 13Department of Internal Medicine, Pisa, Italy

Abstract

Background Only one biologic agent has been approved for use in SLE, but some are used off-label in various settings. To obtain information systematically regarding this, members of the SLICC group initiated the International Registry for Biologics in SLE (IRBIS). The entire registry contains data from 28 centers.

Objectives To analyse the use of biologics in SLE, and assess the results achieved over the first two years after initiation.

Methods IRBIS investigators provided retrospective data on all patients treated with a biologic for SLE at their center. Standardized case report forms were used to collect demographic, disease-specific and treatment data at the time of biologic initiation and at yearly follow-ups. Here, data is presented from 13 reporting centers for which two-year follow-up data were available.

Results Based on the complete data set, 455 patients were treated with rituximab (84%), belimumab (10%), epratuzumab (5%), and anti-tumor necrosis factor agents (abatacept, etanercept and adalimumab, each <1%). The major organ manifestations leading to biologic treatment were lupus nephritis (LN, 44%), hematological (17%), musculoskeletal (16%), skin disease (10%), CNS (4%) and other (9%). Reasons for choosing the biologic were disease-control (73%), steroid-sparing (5%) or both (23%). At biologic initiation mean disease duration (±SD) was 9.5±7.9 years, and mean age was 42.2±12.5. Most patients (91%) were female. Prior to biologic treatment, most patients (91%) had been treated with one or more immunosuppressants (IS). Just over half (57%) had used 1-2 IS drugs, 21% had used three, and 13% had used 4-6 IS drugs.

At two-year follow-up (n=120), SLE disease activity (SLEDAI) and glucocorticoid (GC) dose was significantly lower versus baseline (mean±SD SLEDAI: 9.4±5.3 to 3.1±2.5; mean±SD GC dose: 10.7±13.9 to 4.8±5.9 mg; paired analyses, p<0.0001 for both comparisons). SLICC damage-index remained unchanged.

At baseline, concomitant GC was used in 91% of patients compared to 61% at follow-up. There was a slight trend to decreasing use of IS drugs from baseline (57%) to follow-up (51%). In almost half of patients (48%) there was at least one adverse event reported over the indicated follow-up period. However, only 5% were related to the biologic agent. Serious adverse events were serious opportunistic infections (n=4), posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES, 3), serious allergic reactions (4), serious infections (6) and death (6).

Conclusions Rituximab was the biologic used most commonly in this multi-center international lupus cohort and was used for a range of SLE manifestations. At two-year follow-up both lupus activity and concomitant glucocorticoid dosage had decreased. Over time, GC use decreased, with a trend for a decrease in IS drug use as well.

Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.