Article Text

AB0694 The efficacy and safety of abatacept (orencia) in patients with active juvenile idiopathic arthritis (jia).
  1. E. S. Zholobova1,
  2. O. U. Konopelko1,
  3. O. S. Rozvadovskaya1,
  4. M. N. Nikolaeva1,
  5. V. Y. Eljashevich1
  1. 1Department Of Pediatric Rheumatology, First Moscow Medical State University I.M. Sechenov, Moscow, Russian Federation


Background From 2009 Abatacept (ABA) – a new generation biological DMARD was approved in Russia. ABA selectively modulates T-cell activation, which seems to play the key role in the pathogenesys of JIA. Efficacy and safety of ABA was assessed in AWAIKEN trial in different types of patients who had polyarticular course of JIA at the enrollment. This prospective observation was aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of ABA in patients with different types and clinical variants of active JIA in real clinical practice.

Methods 27 children with JIA were treated with ABA. 20 (74%) pts had polyarticular course of JIA and 7 (26%) - systemic JIA. 25 (93%) of pts were female. All patients had high degree (III) of disease activity. Mean disease duration was 5,9 ± 3,3yr. 26 patients previously had an inadequate response to 2 or more non-biological, one child with heavy course of systemic JIA was treated with infliximab during 1 year before starting ABA. Treatment effectiveness was assessed according to the ACR Pediatric criteria: ACR pedi 30, ACR pedi 50, ACRpedi 70, and ACR pedi 90 after 6 and 12 months of abatacept therapy. All patients received ABA in dose 10 mg/kg at day 1, week 2 and 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter.

Results In the group of pts with systemic JIA after 6 months of ABA treatment 6 of 7 patients (86%) achieved ACR Pedi 30 response, 5 (71%) – ACR Pedi 50, and 3 (43%) – ACR Pedi 70. 12 months data was available for 5 patients (others are still on treatment but less than 12 moths). Four of five pts (80%) achieved ACR pedi-30, 3(60%) - ACR Pedi 50 response, 2 (40%) ACR pedi 70, and 1 (20%) ACR pedi 90.

In the group of pts with poliarticular course of JIA treatment effectiveness was assessed in 19 pts. One girl had experienced an infusion-related reaction (potentially associated with hypersensitivity) after 3rd infusion and ABA treatment was stopped. After 6 months 17 of 19 pts (89%) achieved ACR pedi 30 response, 14 (74%) - ACR pedi-50, 6 (32%) - ACR pedi-70, 2 (11%) - ACR pedi 90. 11 of 20 patients with polyarticular JIA have completed 12 months of ABA treatment. 9 of them (82%) achieved ACR pedi 30 response, 8 (73%) - ACR pedi 50, 5 (45,0%) - ACR pedi 70 and 1 (9%) - ACR pedi 90.

Adverse events were observed in 2 patients (7,4%): 1 case of infusion related reaction, 1 pts experienced common Herpes simplex infection (ABA treatment was stopped after 12 months).

Conclusions Abatacept have shown its effectiveness in the majority of patients with long standing JIA (systemic and polyarticular course) with high disease activity, and inadequate response to previous treatment with DMARDs. Better results were observed in patients with poliarticular JIA.

Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.