Article Text

PDF
Concise report
Repair of joint erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: prevalence and patient characteristics in a large inception cohort
  1. Michael P M van der Linden,
  2. Ramona Boja,
  3. Naomi B Klarenbeek,
  4. Tom W J Huizinga,
  5. Désirée M van der Heijde,
  6. Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
  1. Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr M P M van der Linden, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands; M.P.M.van_der_Linden{at}lumc.nl

Abstract

Background Joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was until recently seen as an irreversible state. Lately, it was found that repair of bone erosions occurs; however, little is known about its prevalence.

Objective To investigate the frequency of repair and patients' characteristics associated with repair in an inception cohort.

Patients and methods 250 patients with RA, included in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic between 1993 and 2000 and treated with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, were studied (mean follow-up 10.1 years). Radiographs obtained annually were scored using the Sharp–van der Heijde method, initially aware of the chronology. Patients with a negative change in erosion scores on subsequent radiographs were selected and their series of radiographs were rescored with concealed time sequence by three readers. Repair was defined as agreement between two readers of a negative change in erosion scores that persisted for at least 2 years.

Results Repair was identified in 32 joints in 18 patients (7.2%). Patients with repair had a greater prevalence of autoantibodies (rheumatoid arthritis, anti-citrullinated protein antibody) and a higher level of joint destruction. In the joints with repair, arthritis was absent in the 2 years preceding repair.

Conclusions Repair occurred in 7.2% of the patients with RA, particularly in clinically inactive joints in patients with severe destructive disease.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • MPML and RB contributed equally.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the LUMC medical ethical committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.