Background Patients with rheumatic diseases may face ‘discounting’ (denying and patronising) or ‘lack of understanding’ because of having symptoms without external clinical signs, but instruments to assess such invalidation experiences are lacking.
Objectives To develop and evaluate the Illness Invalidation Inventory (3*I), to compare invalidation experiences of two groups of patients who differ in visual signs and laboratory findings—rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and fibromyalgia—and to examine the association of invalidation with health status.
Methods A questionnaire (eight items with respect to five sources: spouse, family, medical professionals, work environment and social services) was constructed. It was completed by 142 patients with RA and 167 patients with fibromyalgia.
Results Principal axis factoring with oblimin rotation yielded two factors with high internal consistency (α>0.70): ‘discounting’ (five items) and ‘lack of understanding’ (three items). Patients with fibromyalgia experienced significantly more discounting and lack of understanding from their family, medical professionals, colleagues and social services than did patients with RA. Both patient groups experienced more invalidation from social services, colleagues and family than from medical professionals and spouses. More discounting and lack of understanding correlated with poorer mental well-being and social functioning in both patient groups. Discounting correlated with more physical disability and pain in patients with RA.
Conclusions The 3*I is a brief, reliable instrument for assessing patients' perceptions of invalidation from different sources, which differ between patient groups and are associated with health status. Future validation research should clarify the clinical impact of invalidation on treatment adherence and outcome.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding Dutch Arthritis Association.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the medical ethics committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.