Article Text

PDF
European biologicals registers: methodology, selected results and perspectives
  1. A Zink1,
  2. J Askling2,3,
  3. W G Dixon4,
  4. L Klareskog3,
  5. A J Silman4,
  6. D P M Symmons4
  1. 1
    German Rheumatism Research Centre, Epidemiology Unit, Berlin, Germany
  2. 2
    Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  3. 3
    Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  4. 4
    Arthritis Research Campaign Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  1. ProfessorDr A Zink, German Rheumatism Research Centre, Epidemiology Unit, Chariteplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; zink{at}drfz.de

Abstract

With the licensing of the first tumour necrosis factor (TNF)α inhibitors, independent academia-initiated but industry-sponsored drug registers were set up by the national rheumatology societies in several European countries in order to monitor the long-term safety and effectiveness of this new generation of drugs. Even though different in some respects of study design and monitoring, the registers share a number of common features: they include all licensed biological agents, they observe the patients for a defined period of time or indefinitely irrespective of the drug given and they use comparator cohorts or national registers in order to put the results into perspective. The registers have been collaborating closely since inception. Three of them (the British, Swedish and German registers) have agreed on a standardised reporting system of adverse events which ensures a high and uniform quality of data submitted to the companies, who subsequently report to the drug regulatory authorities, enabling regulatory requirements on safety surveillance to be fulfilled. In the present work, major results on drug safety with regard to infections, malignancies, cardiovascular events, pregnancy outcomes and deaths are summarised. With an increasing number of new drugs and multiple exposures of individual patients the assignment of events to specific treatments will become exceedingly difficult. This and other methodological challenges and the approaches to cope with them are discussed. A growing dialogue between drug regulatory authorities, academic medicine and companies in order to make best use of the potentials of academia-driven drug registers as new tools for pharmacovigilance with currently described rheumatology registers as prototypes is anticipated.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.