rss

This article has a correction

Please see: Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1519

Ann Rheum Dis 68:1220-1227 doi:10.1136/ard.2008.091876
  • Basic and translational research

Mode of action of abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis patients having failed tumour necrosis factor blockade: a histological, gene expression and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging pilot study

Open Access
  1. M H Buch1,
  2. D L Boyle2,
  3. S Rosengren2,
  4. B Saleem1,
  5. R J Reece1,
  6. L A Rhodes3,
  7. A Radjenovic3,
  8. A English1,
  9. H Tang4,
  10. G Vratsanos4,
  11. P O’Connor5,
  12. G S Firestein2,
  13. P Emery1
  1. 1
    Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  2. 2
    Center for Innovative Therapy, Biomarker Laboratory, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
  3. 3
    Academic Unit of Medical Physics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  4. 4
    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
  5. 5
    Department of Radiology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
  1. Professor P Emery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Second Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds LS7 4SA, UK; p.emery{at}leeds.ac.uk
  • Accepted 3 August 2008
  • Published Online First 4 September 2008

Abstract

Objectives: Abatacept is the only agent currently approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that targets the co-stimulatory signal required for full T-cell activation. No studies have been conducted on its effect on the synovium, the primary site of pathology. The aim of this study was to determine the synovial effect of abatacept in patients with RA and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) blocking therapy.

Methods: This first mechanistic study incorporated both dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy-acquired synovial biopsies before and 16 weeks after therapy, providing tissue for immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time PCR analyses.

Results: Sixteen patients (13 women) were studied; all had previously failed TNFα-blocking therapy. Fifteen patients completed the study. Synovial biopsies showed a small reduction in cellular content, which was significant only for B cells. The quantitative PCR showed a reduction in expression for most inflammatory genes (Wald statistic of p<0.01 indicating a significant treatment effect), with particular reduction in IFNγ of −52% (95% CI −73 to −15, p<0.05); this correlated well with MRI improvements. In addition, favourable changes in the osteoprotegerin and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B levels were noted. DCE–MRI showed a reduction of 15–40% in MRI parameters.

Conclusion: These results indicate that abatacept reduces the inflammatory status of the synovium without disrupting cellular homeostasis. The reductions in gene expression influence bone positively and suggest a basis for the recently demonstrated radiological improvements that have been seen with abatacept treatment in patients with RA.

Footnotes

  • A supplementary methods section is published online only at http://ard.bmj.com/content/vol68/issue7

  • Funding: This study was funded and sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

  • Competing interests: PE has provided expert advice and undertaken clinical trials for Bristol-Myers Squibb.

  • Ethics approval: Leeds research ethics committee approval was obtained before study initiation. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

  • Patient consent: Obtained.