rss
Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:169-174 doi:10.1136/ard.2007.084251
  • Clinical and epidemiological research

Validity of enthesis ultrasound assessment in spondyloarthropathy

  1. E de Miguel1,
  2. T Cobo1,
  3. S Muñoz-Fernández1,
  4. E Naredo2,
  5. J Usón3,
  6. J C Acebes4,
  7. J L Andréu5,
  8. E Martín-Mola1
  1. 1
    Rheumatology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
  2. 2
    Rheumatology Unit, Severo Ocho Hospital, Leganés, Madrid, Spain
  3. 3
    Rheumatology Unit, Mostoles Hospital, Mostoles, Madrid, Spain
  4. 4
    Rheumatology Unit, Fundación Jiménez Díaz Hospital, Madrid, Spain
  5. 5
    Rheumatology Unit, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
  1. Dr E de Miguel, Rheumatology Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, P° de la Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain; eugenio.demiguel{at}gmail.com
  • Accepted 29 March 2008
  • Published Online First 7 April 2008

Abstract

Objectives: To develop an ultrasound enthesis score and to assess its validity in the diagnostic classification of the spondyloarthropathies (SpAs).

Methods: Twenty-five patients with SpA and 29 healthy controls participated in a blinded, gender-matched, cross-sectional study involving ultrasound assessment. The following entheses were explored bilaterally: proximal plantar fascia, distal Achilles tendon, distal and proximal patellar ligament, distal quadriceps and brachial triceps tendons. The ultrasound score evaluated enthesis thickness, structure, calcifications, erosions, bursae and power Doppler signal. The value of each elemental lesion was calculated using a three-model analysis. Validity was analysed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Inter-reader and interexplorer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated.

Results: The logistic regression model overestimated the score of three elemental lesions: calcification (0–3), Doppler (0 or 3) and erosion (0 or 3), while scoring tendon structure, tendon thickness and bursa as 0 or 1. ROC curves established an ultrasound score of ≥18 as the best cut-off point for differentiation between cases and controls. This cut-off point was exceeded by 5/29 controls (17%) and by 21/25 patients with SpA (84%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+, LR−) were 83.3%, 82.8%, 4.8% and 0.2%, respectively. The inter-reader and interexplorer ICCs were 0.60 and 0.86, respectively.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that the ultrasound enthesis score could be a valid tool in the diagnosis of SpA.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Funding: This study was supported by a grant from Whyet Pharma Spain.

  • Ethics approval: Approved by the hospital ethics committee.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. ard.2007.084251v1
    2. 68/2/169 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.