rss
Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1715-1720 doi:10.1136/ard.2008.095539
  • Clinical and epidemiological research
  • Extended report

Efficacy of prednisone 1–4 mg/day in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled withdrawal clinical trial

This article has been Unlocked
  1. T Pincus1,
  2. C J Swearingen2,
  3. G Luta3,
  4. T Sokka4
  1. 1
    New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
  2. 2
    Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
  3. 3
    Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
  4. 4
    Arkisto/Tutkijat, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
  1. Correspondence to Dr T Pincus, Department of Rheumatology, Room 1608, NYU-Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA; tedpincus{at}gmail.com
  • Accepted 18 November 2008
  • Published Online First 15 December 2008

Abstract

Objective: A randomised double-blind placebo controlled withdrawal clinical trial of prednisone versus placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), treated in usual clinical care with 1–4 mg/day prednisone, withdrawn to the same dose of 1 mg prednisone or identical placebo tablets.

Methods: All patients were from one academic setting and all trial visits were conducted in usual clinical care. Patients were taking stable doses of 1–4 mg prednisone with stable clinical status, documented quantitatively by patient questionnaire scores. The protocol included three phases: (1) equivalence: 1–4 study prednisone 1 mg tablets taken for 12 weeks to ascertain their efficacy compared with the patient’s usual tablets before randomisation; (2) transfer: substitution of a 1 mg prednisone or identical placebo tablet every 4 weeks (over 0–12 weeks) to the same number as baseline prednisone; (3) comparison: observation over 24 subsequent weeks taking the same number of either placebo or prednisone tablets as at baseline. The primary outcome was withdrawal due to patient-reported lack of efficacy versus continuation in the trial for 24 weeks.

Results: Thirty-one patients were randomised, 15 to prednisone and 16 to placebo, with three administrative discontinuations. In “intent-to-treat” analyses, 3/15 prednisone and 11/16 placebo participants withdrew (p = 0.03). Among participants eligible for the primary outcome, 3/13 prednisone and 11/15 placebo participants withdrew for lack of efficacy (p = 0.02). No meaningful adverse events were reported, as anticipated.

Conclusion: Efficacy of 1–4 mg prednisone was documented. Evidence of statistically significant differences with only 31 patients may suggest a robust treatment effect.

Footnotes

  • Funding This work was supported in part by grants from the Arthritis Foundation, the Jack C Massey Foundation and Health Report Services Inc.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval The trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Vanderbilt University and all participants gave informed consent to participate.

This article has been Unlocked

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.