Article Text

PDF
Clinical subsequent fractures cluster in time after first fractures
  1. T A C M van Geel1,
  2. S van Helden2,
  3. P P Geusens3,4,
  4. B Winkens5,
  5. G-J Dinant1
  1. 1
    Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  2. 2
    Department of Trauma Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  3. 3
    Department of Internal Medicine, Subdivision of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  4. 4
    Biomedical Research Institute, University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
  5. 5
    Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  1. T van Geel, Maastricht University, Department of General Practice, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands; t.vangeel{at}hag.unimaas.nl

Abstract

Objectives: The risk of subsequent fractures is double the risk of having a first fracture. We analysed whether this risk is constant or not over time.

Methods: A population-based study in 4140 postmenopausal women, aged between 50 and 90 years, on radiographic confirmed clinical fractures from menopause onwards analysed by Cox regression.

Results: A total of 924 (22%) women had a first fracture and 243 (26% of 924) a subsequent fracture. Of all first fractures, 4% occurred in each year from menopause onwards, while after a first fracture 23% of all subsequent fractures occurred within 1 year and 54% within 5 years.

When calculated from time of first fracture, the relative risk (RR) of subsequent fracture was 2.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 2.6) and remained increased over 15 years. When calculated for specific time intervals after a first fracture, the RR was 5.3 (95% CI 4.0 to 6.6) within 1 year, 2.8 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.6) within 2–5 years, 1.4 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.8) within 6–10 years and 0.41 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.53) after >10 years.

Conclusions: From menopause onwards, clinical fractures cluster in time, indicating the need for early action to prevent subsequent fractures.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Funding: This project was supported by grants from the Maastricht University School for Public Health and Primary Care (Caphri).

  • Ethics approval: The Medical Ethics Committee of Maastricht University and the Maastricht University Hospital approved the study (reference no. MEC 94–196.1).

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.