Article Text

PDF
Progression of radiographic damage in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: defining the central role of syndesmophytes
  1. X Baraliakos1,
  2. J Listing2,
  3. M Rudwaleit3,
  4. H Haibel3,
  5. J Brandt1,
  6. J Sieper3,
  7. J Braun1
  1. 1Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
  2. 2German Rheumatism Research Center, Berlin, Germany
  3. 3Rheumatology, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor Dr J Braun
    Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Landgrafenstr 15, 44652 Herne, Germany;j.braun{at}rheumazentrum-ruhrgebiet.de

Abstract

Background: Structural changes such as erosions, syndesmophytes and ankylosis are characteristic of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). These can be quantified by the modified Stokes Anklylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS). It is unknown which radiographic feature is most relevant for the assessment of change and the prediction of future damage in AS.

Objectives: To analyse radiographic progression in AS by using different assessments to define the most important changes.

Methods: Spinal radiographs of 116 patients with AS were scored by the mSASSS at baseline (BL) and after 2 years. Radiographic progression was assessed by differentiating (1) any change; (2) progression to syndesmophytes/ankylosis (definite change); and (3) changes exceeding the smallest detectable change (SDC) as predefined. A growth angle of 45° was used to differentiate syndesmophytes from spondylophytes.

Results: Some radiographic progression after 2 years was detected in 42% of patients, novel syndesmophytes in 31% of patients, and, using the SDC (calculated at 2 mSASSS units) as cut-off, progression was seen in 28% of patients. Thus, in 74% of the patients changes were because of syndesmophytes and/or ankylosis. Using the predefined cut-off, only 12% of all syndesmophytes were spondylophytes. Patients with such changes were of older age. Definite radiographic progression was found in 44% of the patients with syndesmophytes/ankylosis at BL (n = 57) versus 19% (p = 0.03) of the patients without such changes (n = 59).

Conclusions: Syndesmophytes and ankylosis are the most relevant structural changes in AS, and also in the mSASSS. Development of just one syndesmophyte within 2 years indicates progression of structural changes in AS; this is relevant for clinical practice. Syndesmophytes are the best predictors of radiographic progression.

  • AS, ankylosing spondylitis
  • mSASSS, modified Stokes Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score
  • SDC, smallest detectable change
  • SDD, smallest detectable difference
  • TNF, tumour necrosis factor

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 28 February 2007

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.