Article Text

PDF
Combining information obtained from magnetic resonance imaging and conventional radiographs to detect sacroiliitis in patients with recent onset inflammatory back pain
  1. L Heuft-Dorenbosch1,
  2. R Landewé2,
  3. R Weijers4,
  4. A Wanders1,
  5. H Houben3,
  6. S van der Linden2,
  7. D van der Heijde2
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
  2. 2CAPHRI Research Institute, University Maastricht
  3. 3Department of Rheumatology, Atrium Hospital Heerlen, Netherlands
  4. 4Department of Radiology, University Hospital Maastricht
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor Désirée van der Heijde
    Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Rheumatology, PO Box 5800, 6202AZ Maastricht, Netherlands; dhe{at}sint.azm.nl

Abstract

Objective: To compare the contribution of changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conventional radiography (CR) in the sacroiliac joints of patients with recent onset inflammatory back pain (IBP) in making an early diagnosis of spondyloarthritides.

Methods: The study involved 68 patients with IBP (38% male; mean (SD) age, 34.9 (10.3) years) with symptom duration less than two years. Coronal MRI of the sacroiliac joints was scored for inflammation and structural changes, and pelvic radiographs were scored by the modified New York (mNY) grading. Agreement between MRI and CR was analysed by cross tabulation per sacroiliac joint and per patient.

Results: A structural change was detected in 20 sacroiliac joints by MRI and in 37 by CR. Inflammation was detected in 36 sacroiliac joints by MRI, and 22 of these showed radiographic sacroiliitis. Fourteen patients fulfilled the mNY criteria based on CR. Classification according to the modified New York criteria would be justified for eight patients if it was based on MRI for structural changes only, for 14 if it was based on structural changes on CR, for 14 (partly) different patients if it was based on inflammation on MRI only, for 16 if it was based on inflammation and structural changes on MRI, for 19 if it was based on inflammation on CR combined with MRI, and for (the same) 19 if it was based on inflammation and structural damage on CR combined with MRI.

Conclusions: CR can detect structural changes in SI joints with higher sensitivity than MRI. However, inflammation on MRI can be found in a substantial proportion of patients with IBP but normal radiographs. Assessment of structural changes by CR followed by assessment of inflammation on MRI in patients with negative findings gives the highest returns for detecting involvement of the SI joints by imaging in patients with recent onset IBP.

  • ESSG, European Spondylarthropathy Study Group
  • IBP, inflammatory back pain
  • STIR, short tau inversion recovery
  • ankylosing spondylitis
  • spondyloarthritis
  • inflammatory back pain
  • sacroiliitis
  • imaging

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 11 October 2005

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.