Current evidence for the management of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic literature review for the ASAS/EULAR management recommendations in ankylosing spondylitis
=====================================================================================================================================================================

* J Zochling
* D van der Heijde
* M Dougados
* J Braun

## Abstract

**Objective:** To assess available management strategies in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) using a systematic approach, as a part of the development of evidence based recommendations for the management of AS.

**Methods:** A systematic search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify relevant interventions for the management of AS. Evidence for each intervention was categorised by study type, and outcome data for efficacy, adverse effects, and cost effectiveness were abstracted. The effect size, rate ratio, number needed to treat, and incremental cost effectiveness ratio were calculated for each intervention where possible. Results from randomised controlled trials were pooled where appropriate.

**Results:** Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions considered to be of interest to clinicians involved in the management of AS were identified. Good evidence (level Ib) exists supporting the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and coxibs for symptomatic treatment. Non-pharmacological treatments are also supported for maintaining function in AS. The use of conventional antirheumatoid arthritis drugs is not well supported by high level research evidence. Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (infliximab and etanercept) have level Ib evidence supporting large treatment effects for spinal pain and function in AS over at least 6 months. Level IV evidence supports surgical interventions in specific patients.

**Conclusion:** This extensive literature review forms the evidence base considered in the development of the new ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of AS.

*   AS, ankylosing spondylitis
*   ASAS, ASsessment in AS
*   CI, confidence interval
*   DMARDs, disease modifying antirheumatic drugs
*   ES, effect size
*   GI, gastrointestinal
*   IV, intravenous
*   MeSH, medical subject heading
*   NNT, number needed to treat
*   NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
*   RCT, randomised controlled trial
*   RR, relative risk
*   THR, total hip replacement
*   TNF, tumour necrosis factor


*   ankylosing spondylitis
*   evidence based medicine
*   systematic review

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease most commonly affecting the axial skeleton, which historically has been difficult to treat. Recent years have seen the introduction of exciting new therapeutic strategies, particularly the tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Therefore it is important that clinicians are aware of the relative benefits and risks of the different treatments available to them, and have evidence based information about which strategies are the most efficacious in particular patient settings.

The ASsessment in AS (ASAS) International Working Group, in collaboration with the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), recently developed evidence based recommendations for the management of AS1 to assist all health professionals involved in the care of patients with AS.

The recommendations were developed using information from two major sources: a systematic review of the literature, and expert opinion based on the research evidence and clinical expertise.1 This review details the literature search performed and the results presented to the expert committee for the purpose of developing recommendations for the management of AS.

## METHODS

A systematic search of the literature published between January 1966 and December 2004 was undertaken using Medline, Embase, CINHAL, PEDro, and Cochrane Library databases. The search included both a general search and an intervention-specific search. The general search strategy consisted of two basic components: AS in whatever possible terms in the databases (Appendix 1) and types of research in the form of systematic review/meta-analysis, randomised controlled trial (RCT)/controlled trial, uncontrolled trial, cohort study, case-control study, cross sectional study, and economic evaluation (Appendix 2). The general search aimed at summarising the current available treatments from the literature for AS. The summary results of this search were reported to the ASAS/EULAR expert committee at the beginning of the recommendation development process.

After the expert group had generated 10 recommendation propositions, an intervention-specific search was undertaken to identify evidence for each specific treatment. The search strategy included the terms for AS (Appendix 1) and any possible terms for the specific intervention. The results of the two searches were then combined and duplications excluded. Medical subject heading (MeSH) search was used for all databases and keyword search was used if the MeSH search was not available. All MeSH search terms were exploded. The reference lists of reviews or systematic reviews were examined and any additional studies meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included.

The search in the Cochrane Library included a MeSH search of the Cochrane reviews, abstracts of Quality Assessed Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, NHS Economic Evaluation Databases, Health Technology Assessment Database, and NHS Economic Evaluation Bibliography Details Only. Abstracts of scientific meetings held in 2003 and 2004 and “online first” publications were also hand searched for relevant studies.

### Inclusion/exclusion criteria

Only studies with clinical outcomes for AS were included. The main focus of interest was on systematic reviews, RCTs/controlled trials, uncontrolled trials/cohort studies, case-control studies, cross sectional studies, and economic evaluations. Studies that included patients with AS in a larger cohort of different spondyloarthritides (for example, psoriatic arthritis) were excluded unless the results for patients with AS were reported separately. Studies of other seronegative spondyloarthritides or other inflammatory joint conditions, animal studies, non-clinical outcome studies, narrative review articles, commentaries, and guidelines were also excluded.

### Categorising evidence

Evidence was categorised according to study design using a hierarchy of evidence in descending order according to qualities2 (table 1), and the highest level of available evidence for each intervention was reviewed in detail. When very few high level studies were available, the next highest category was also reviewed. The most recent meta-analysis of RCTs (level Ia) was reviewed for each intervention, and any RCTs published since the meta-analysis was conducted were also considered.

View this table:
[ Table 1 ](http://ard.bmj.com/content/65/4/423/T1)

 **Table 1**  
 Evidence hierarchy and traditional strength of recommendation

Efficacy was assessed specifically for AS, and toxicity data were evaluated specifically for the intervention, irrespective of the musculoskeletal condition.

### Estimation of effectiveness and cost effectiveness

Effect size (ES, mean change divided by the standard deviation of the change) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) compared with placebo or active control were calculated for two predetermined continuous outcomes: pain relief and improvement in function.3 The percentage of patients with an ASAS20 response to treatment, or with moderate to excellent (predefined as more than 50%) pain relief or moderate functional improvement (predefined as more than 20%) was calculated where possible, and the number needed to treat (NNT) was estimated for these dichotomous outcomes.4 The NNT is the number of patients who need to be treated with a given intervention in order to prevent one poor outcome, and is the inverse of the absolute risk reduction. Results from the latest systematic review were used if there was more than one systematic review for the same intervention. Statistical pooling was undertaken as appropriate5 when a systematic review was not available, or when more recent RCTs could be included. The NNT and 95% CI were reported only if statistically significant; otherwise “NS” (not significant) was used to avoid difficulty in interpreting the results.6 Relative risk (RR) was calculated for adverse effects.

When economic evaluation was available, study design, comparator, perspective, time horizon, discounting, total costs, and effectiveness were reviewed. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was calculated. Quality of life years were used when available, otherwise disease-specific outcomes such as pain relief and functional improvement were used.

Data were extracted by one investigator (JZ). A customised form was used for the data extraction.

## RESULTS

### Treatment modalities and types of research evidence

The general search yielded 4100 hits (Medline 2395, Embase 1581, CINAHL 73, PEDro 16, and Cochrane 35). After deleting duplications, non-treatment studies, and studies of diseases other than AS, 458 hits remained. Of these, 318 were original studies and 140 were narrative reviews, commentaries, or editorials. Figure 1 shows the breakdown of interventions among the original 318 studies. Of these studies, 35 were RCTs, 7 were systematic reviews, and 4 were economic evaluations.

![ Figure 1 ](http://ard.bmj.com/https://ard.bmj.com/content/annrheumdis/65/4/423/F1.medium.gif)

[ Figure 1 ](http://ard.bmj.com/content/65/4/423/F1)

 **Figure 1**  
 Interventions for AS from the general literature search.

The results from the intervention-specific search were merged with the results from the general search. After deleting the duplications and articles irrelevant to the questions (for example, studies on radiation therapy), 317 studies remained for review. These included: 73 related to non-pharmacological treatments; 55 associated with NSAIDs or coxibs; 61 in relation to conventional anti-rheumatoid arthritis drugs; 8 for bisphosphonate treatment; 6 for thalidomide; 15 for corticosteroids (intravenous or intra-articular); 64 for biological treatments; and 55 relevant to total hip replacement or spinal surgery.

The evidence for each intervention relevant to the ASAS/EULAR recommendations, as presented to the expert group, is discussed below.

### Non-pharmacological treatment

#### Physiotherapy and exercise

The effect of physiotherapy has recently been reviewed in a Cochrane systematic review7 summarising the findings of six randomised or quasi-randomised trials. Of the studies included, Kraag *et al* reported that an individual programme of therapeutic exercise combined with education and disease information significantly improved function at 4 months (ES 1.14, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.73) compared with no intervention.8 There was no significant effect on pain levels. After the 4 month trial, this improvement in function was maintained by minimal continuing treatment (1.5 mean visits from the physiotherapist between month 4 and month 8).9

Hidding *et al* compared group physical therapy and home exercises with home exercises alone, after an intensive training programme for both groups, and found that although pain and functioning improved significantly in both intervention groups, there was no significant difference between the groups for these two outcome measures.10 Patient global assessment of improvement and spinal mobility were seen to be statistically higher in the group physiotherapy arm (p<0.05). Cost effectiveness analysis of these patients11 showed that each centimetre of visual analogue scale improvement cost $292 over 1 year.

A third study compared intensive inpatient physiotherapy, hydrotherapy with home exercises, and home exercise alone, but did not specify pain or function as separate outcome variables.12 This study showed significant short term improvement in composite pain and stiffness in the inpatient treatment group at 6 weeks, but there was no difference between the three groups at 6 months. Comparison of an intensive group exercise programme with unsupervised home exercise13 found that neither pain nor function was significantly better in the group physiotherapy arm than in the home exercise arm. A home based exercise and education package was not shown to improve pain or function compared with controls over 6 months.14 However, a recent small RCT of home exercise not included in the Cochrane review showed significant improvements after 8 weeks in both pain (ES 1.99, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.67) and function (ES 0.80, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.38) in young patients with AS (mean age 28 years) who had previously been sedentary.15 It was not possible to pool the results of separate studies owing to differing interventions and outcome measures. The literature suggests that different types of exercise based intervention can impact on disease outcomes in AS, which might account for the lack of significant differences between treatment arms in the absence of a placebo/no treatment arm.

Specific physiotherapy interventions have been less well studied in AS. One randomised controlled trial comparing transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) with sham TENS treatment over 3 weeks reported a significant short term improvement in pain in the treatment arm16; however, when the data were reanalysed the ES of 0.92 did not reach statistical significance (95% CI −0.01 to 1.86, p = 0.05). Passive stretching has been shown in a controlled study to improve range of movement at the hip,17 but pain and function were not assessed. Pulsed magnetic fields may have an effect on pain, as shown in a small open study of seven patients with AS who were intolerant of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).18 Level Ib evidence does not support the use of heat or whole-body cryotherapy.19 A number of open studies (level IV evidence) have shown variable results for spa treatment.20–23 The only randomised controlled trial identified looked at the effect of a 3 week spa exercise programme followed by weekly group physiotherapy sessions, compared with group physiotherapy alone.24 Function was seen to be significantly improved in the spa groups at 4 and 12 weeks (p<0.01), but the effect of treatment on pain or function was not significantly different between the groups at the end of the 40 week study period. A cost effectiveness analysis of this cohort25 showed an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of €7465 to €18 575 for each quality of life year gained over the trial period.

#### Education

The effect of isolated education for AS is not clear. There has been one controlled study of self management courses for patients with AS,26 which showed early improvements in functioning in the treatment group after 3 weeks, but failed to show significant improvements in pain or function compared with controls at 6 months. Importantly, education brought considerable improvements in self efficacy and motivation. A small controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy targeting relaxation, modifying thoughts and feelings, and scheduling positive activities27 failed to show any significant improvements in pain (ES 0.53, 95% CI −0.07 to 1.13); however, there was a convincing improvement in anxiety (ES 1.11, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.75). Cost analysis of a patient education programme over 12 months suggests that indirect cost savings more than compensate for the costs of the programme through a reduction in work days lost.28 There are no clinical studies of the effect of participation in an AS self help group on disease parameters. Vocational rehabilitation is effective in returning patients with chronic rheumatic diseases to work,29 but studies do not distinguish between diseases.

#### Lifestyle modification

There is little available evidence to support lifestyle modification in AS. Stopping smoking may be of benefit; three cross sectional studies have shown a poorer functional outcome in patients with AS who smoke,30–32 but there have not been any interventional studies to support this observation. A low starch diet was effective in reducing pain in one case study,33 but the only open study available did not report pain or function as outcomes.34 A small case-control study of dairy restriction in patients with arthritis showed that significantly more patients with SpA than those with RA (p<0.001) reported moderate or good subjective improvement.35

#### NSAIDs and coxibs

Eight randomised, placebo controlled trials were identified, all of which supported the use of NSAIDs or coxibs for pain in AS.36–43 Pooling of results was possible for four NSAID trials, three of which compared a conventional NSAID with a coxib in addition to the placebo arm.41–43 There is thus convincing level Ib evidence that NSAIDs improve spinal pain compared with placebo (ES 1.11, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.26), peripheral joint pain (ES 0.62, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.97, reported in only one study36), and function (ES 0.62, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.76) over a short time period (6 weeks). Coxibs are equally effective, the ES for spinal pain 1.05 (0.88 to 1.22) and for function 0.63 (0.47 to 0.80), also showing moderate to large effects in patients with AS compared with placebo. The effect of coxibs on peripheral arthritis has not been specifically investigated in AS; all studies have excluded patients with active peripheral synovitis. A post hoc analysis of etoricoxib in patients with AS with chronic peripheral arthritis compared with spinal disease alone suggests poorer spinal response rates in patients with arthritis.44 Most RCTs of NSAID treatment in AS compare different NSAID compounds, with no clear indication that any one preparation is more efficacious than the others.45–70

Safety concerns associated with NSAIDs and more recently with coxibs must, however, be considered. The recent EULAR recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis71 include an extensive review of the gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity of anti-inflammatory agents; in short, NSAIDs cause an increased risk of GI bleeding,72–77 which is dose dependent,75 and can be reduced with gastroprotective agents such as misoprostol, double doses of H2 blockers, and proton pump inhibitors.78–82 Severe GI toxicity (peptic ulceration and bleeding) has been shown to be lower with coxibs,83 although there remains a considerable risk of GI symptoms including dyspepsia and diarrhoea.

Cardiovascular toxicity with coxibs and NSAIDs has become very topical, and what began initially as a safety signal with rofecoxib has now been seen with other coxib preparations and, most recently, with traditional NSAIDs. The most recent meta-analysis of RCTs of rofecoxib84 calculated the relative risk for myocardial infarction with rofecoxib as 2.30 (95% CI 1.22 to 4.33) compared with placebo. Analysis of preliminary 3 year data from the Adenomatous Polyposis Prevention with Vioxx (APPROVe) study85 showed an increased risk of serious thromboembolic events, including myocardial infarction or stroke in the rofecoxib treated group after 18 months of chronic dosage (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.11), and led to the removal of rofecoxib from the market. Preliminary results of one of two long term cancer prevention studies have subsequently shown celecoxib to be associated with a dose related increase in cardiovascular risk compared with placebo,86 and valdecoxib was associated with an increased risk (RR 3.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 13.5) of serious cardiovascular outcome in patients with a coronary artery bypass graft compared with placebo.87 In short, cardiovascular toxicity seems to be a class effect of the coxibs. This may well not be the end of the story, however; concerns were recently raised after preliminary data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Anti-Inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT) suggested a 50% higher risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in naproxen treated patients compared with placebo (unpublished data). The subject of cardiovascular toxicity with traditional NSAIDs is evolving, and continuing research will hopefully clarify the increased risk which may be associated with NSAID use.

#### Simple analgesics

There is no disease-specific evidence to support the use of paracetamol or other analgesics in AS. One small cross sectional study using mail-out questionnaires found that in 15 patients with AS who took both simple analgesics and NSAIDs for their disease, 13 (87%) patients felt that simple analgesics were less effective than NSAIDs,88 but the question has not been assessed in a prospective manner.

#### Local and systemic corticosteroids

Intra-articular steroid injections have been shown to be effective for sacroiliitis (level Ib evidence), with a small randomised placebo controlled trial showing an improvement in pain of 1.94 (95% CI 0.53 to 3.35).89 Periarticular corticosteroid injection around the sacroiliac joint has also been shown to be effective,90 responses persisting for at least 8 weeks (p = 0.02). There are no clinical studies on the efficacy of intra-articular steroid on peripheral arthritis or enthesitis in AS. One observational study of 51 patients with early oligoarthritis (median disease duration 16 weeks) has shown that intra-articular treatment is effective, improving disease activity as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire, swollen joint count, and patient’s global pain and disease activity assessments91; however, by the end of the study no patient had been diagnosed with AS (26 remained undifferentiated oligoarthritis). There have been no clinical trials on the use of local corticosteroid injections for the enthesitis of AS.

Intravenous methylprednisolone has been described as useful in recalcitrant cases of severe, active AS (level IV evidence).92–95 No studies evaluating the effect of oral corticosteroid treatment in AS have been published.

### Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)

#### Sulfasalazine

Sulfasalazine has inconclusive level Ia evidence for efficacy in AS. The most recent meta-analysis96 reviewed 12 randomised controlled trials in active AS, and concluded that there is no evidence for a clinically relevant benefit on spinal symptoms or function, but sulfasalazine may have a role in peripheral joint disease associated with spondyloarthritis. When data from the individual trials were pooled, the effect on back pain (ES −2.38, 95% CI −5.78 to 1.03) or physical function (ES 0.20, 95% CI −0.77 to 1.18) with sulfasalazine compared with placebo was not significant. Two studies described combined groups of patients with spondyloarthritis without reporting results in AS separately. Dougados *et al* found a significant improvement in swollen joint count in patients treated with sulfasalazine (p = 0.002),97 and Clegg *et al* showed that improvements in patient global assessments were more marked in the subgroup of patients with peripheral joint involvement.98 In the only extended AS trial reviewed,99 patients treated with sulfasalazine over 3 years had significantly fewer episodes of peripheral joint symptoms than those receiving placebo (p<0.05). There is level IV evidence against an effect of sulfasalazine on enthesitis in spondyloarthritis.100 A pilot study of 5-aminosalicylic acid (thought to be the active moiety in sulfasalazine) in AS showed improvements in investigator global assessment and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, but did not examine pain or function separately.101

Toxicity with sulfasalazine is common (RR for any adverse event 2.37, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.55)—usually gastrointestinal symptoms, mucocutaneous manifestations, hepatic enzyme abnormalities, and haematological abnormalities.

#### Methotrexate

One systematic review has been published on the use of methotrexate in AS.102 This reviewed two RCTs, one in 51 patients comparing methotrexate 7.5 mg orally a week in combination with naproxen 1000 mg orally daily with naproxen 1000 mg orally daily alone,103 and a second in 30 patients comparing methotrexate 10 mg orally a week with placebo.104 Outcome measures differed substantially between the two studies, and so pooling of results was not possible. The authors concluded that there was no evidence to support the use of methotrexate in AS. Since that publication, there has been one further RCT reporting methotrexate 7.5 mg orally a week compared with placebo in only 35 patients.105 The cohort had a much higher prevalence of peripheral arthritis than the previous two studies (60% *v* 12% and 30%). Although significant improvements in the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), spinal pain and the Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI) were seen in the treatment arm, there was no significant difference in effect compared with placebo. Pooling results103,105 gave an effect size for spinal pain of −0.05 (95% CI −0.48 to 0.38) and for function of 0.02 (95% CI −0.40 to 0.45), neither of which reached statistical significance. Roychowdhury *et al* are the only group to report separate outcomes for patients with peripheral joint involvement, subgroup analysis failing to show any improvement in disease activity with methotrexate in patients with peripheral arthritis, although numbers were small (n = 9).104 There has been one controlled trial, published in abstract form,106 reporting significant improvement in the number of swollen joints in patients with AS with peripheral arthritis with methotrexate 7.5 mg orally a week, NSAID, and physiotherapy (p<0.0001), but results of comparison with the control group of NSAID and physiotherapy alone were not given.

Five meta-analyses of RCTs of methotrexate treatment102,107–110 included toxicity data. The most commonly reported side effects of methotrexate treatment at doses equivalent to those used in rheumatological practice include nausea (RR 2.12, 95% CI 1.50 to 2.98) and hepatic abnormalities (RR 4.12, 95% CI 2.22 to 7.63). Other common adverse events recognised at higher doses did not occur significantly more often with treatment than in controls. Ortiz reported a meta-analysis of the use of folate and/or folinic acid in conjunction with low dose methotrexate treatment in rheumatoid arthritis, and concluded that folate is effective in preventing GI and mucocutaneous adverse events (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.80),111 but there was no convincing evidence to support the use of folinic acid (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.12). In patients with AS, an observational study of stopping treatment owing to drug toxicity112 found that 21% of patients had stopped methotrexate treatment by 12 months because of significant adverse events (n = 14).

#### Pamidronate

Intravenous pamidronate has been studied in open trials,113–116 with contradictory results. The best available evidence is level III117—a comparative RCT of 60 mg intravenous (IV) pamidronate against 10 mg IV pamidronate, which supports the use of higher dose bisphosphonate for function (ES 0.73, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.17) and for axial pain (p = 0.003, insufficient data given to calculate ES). The authors comment that the study was not powered to show any effect on peripheral arthritis. Further RCTs are needed to answer this question. The most commonly reported side effects of IV pamidronate are transient post-infusional arthralgias and myalgias (in up to 78% of patients in observational studies114,117,118) and an acute phase response with lymphopenia and raised C reactive protein,119 which rarely lead to treatment discontinuation.

#### Thalidomide

Thalidomide is receiving increasing attention as a possible treatment for severe AS; to date there have been two open trials published showing significant improvement in axial pain and function,120,121 but effects on peripheral disease have not been reported. Toxicity is substantial, open studies showing consistent problems with drowsiness, dizziness, dry mouth, headache, constipation, and nausea (all >15% incidence rates) and high rates of treatment withdrawal due to side effects.

#### Other traditional DMARDs used in RA

There is little evidence to support the use of the DMARDs that are used in rheumatoid arthritis in AS. Single case studies support the use of ciclosporin122 and azathioprine.123 There are no studies of efficacy for hydroxychloroquine on musculoskeletal disease in AS, although one case study reports a good result in AS associated iridocyclitis.124 Auranofin treatment was not clinically effective in the only retrieved controlled trial,125 although the study was too small to reflect an effect on the subgroup of patients with peripheral joint disease. Intravenous cyclophosphamide may be effective in severe, active disease associated with peripheral arthritis,126,127 supported by level IV evidence. The only RCT of leflunomide in AS128 failed to show a significant effect on pain (ES 0.14, 95% CI −0.48 to 0.76) or function (ES −0.10, 95% CI −0.72 to 0.52), but was not powered to see any effect on peripheral arthritis, which had been suggested to respond to treatment in an earlier open study.129 Similarly, one RCT of d-penicillamine in AS was retrieved,130 which found no effect of treatment on pain (level Ib), and case series of peripheral arthritis in AS have failed to show any benefit.131,132

### Biological treatments

#### Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors

Six placebo RCTs of TNF inhibition in AS were found which examined pain and/or function as separate outcomes. For spinal pain, etanercept (pooled ES 2.25, 95% CI 1.92 to 2.59)133–136 and infliximab (ES 0.90, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.14)137,138 both gave large improvements, with a pooled ES for spinal pain of 1.36 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.55). Three of these studies reported a moderate effect of treatment on peripheral joint pain,133,135,137 with a pooled ES of 0.61 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.95). Significant effects (pooled ES 1.39, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.57) were also seen for improvement in function, as measured by the BASFI in all studies: for etanercept, the pooled ES was 2.11 (95% CI 1.81 to 2.41) and for infliximab ES was 0.93 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.17). The NNT to achieve an ASAS20 response with infliximab was 2.3 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.0), and for etanercept was 2.7 (95% CI 2.2 to 3.4). Pooling results for both etanercept and infliximab, the NNT with TNF blockers to achieve an ASAS20 response in patients with active disease was 2.6 (95% CI 2.2 to 3.0). To date there is only one AS open trial of adalimumab, the most recent TNF antagonist to become available for treatment in rheumatic diseases, but preliminary data show significant improvements in pain and function.139

TNF blocker related toxicity is an important consideration. RCTs reflect some of the well recognised adverse effects of treatment, including a high incidence of injection site reactions with subcutaneous etanercept (pooled RR from trials in rheumatoid arthritis and AS was calculated at 3.12, 95% CI 2.50 to 3.90 compared with placebo) and development of antinuclear antibodies with intravenous infliximab (pooled RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.61 to 3.53). Other expected toxicities did not reach statistical significance in the RCTs pooled, but the nature of patient selection in such trials and the relatively low incidence of more serious adverse events make it difficult to extrapolate these results to everyday clinical practice. It is important to remember that treatment has been associated with increased risk of infection, both of common upper respiratory tract infections and of opportunistic infections140,141—in particular, tuberculosis.142,143 Screening for *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* has been shown to decrease the incidence of tuberculous disease associated with TNF blockers,144 and is now a standard prerequisite for TNF blocker treatment. Demyelinating disease,145 lupus-like syndromes,146–148 and worsening of pre-existent congestive heart failure149–151 have also been reported in case series, although precise incidences are not known.

#### Interleukin 1 inhibitors

The only other non-TNF biological modifier to be studied in AS to date is the interleukin 1 inhibitor anakinra, again only in open label trials.152,153 Results are not consistent, with one study152 showing a significant improvement in pain (p = 0.04) and function (p = 0.02) and the second,153 failing to find any significant improvements with treatment.

### Radiation

#### Local irradiation

Observational studies154–156 and one RCT157 were retrieved showing that local irradiation to the spine and sacroiliac joints in patients with AS is effective for pain relief for up to 12 months (level Ib evidence). Physical function was not assessed. There is a large body of evidence for the carcinogenicity of this treatment,158–161 particularly for leukaemia (RR 2.74, 95% CI 2.10 to 3.53) and other cancers of irradiated sites (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.32) compared with patients with AS not treated with *x* rays.162,163

#### Intravenous radium-224 chloride

Intravenous treatment with the radioactive isotope radium chloride (224Ra) is largely of historical interest, and not available today for the treatment of AS in most countries. It was used at high doses in the 1940s and 1950s for the treatment of various bone and joint diseases, including tuberculosis and AS. Such high doses have since been abandoned owing to unacceptable toxicity,164 but lower doses are currently in use since the reintroduction of intravenous 224Ra for AS in Germany in 2000.165224Ra has been shown to be effective for pain and spinal stiffness in AS in observational studies—most uncontrolled (best evidence level IIb).166–172 There has been no formal assessment of the effect of 224Ra on physical function. Owing to variable study reporting and different study outcome measures it was not possible to calculate pooled ES, but “response” rates reported by patients range from 40% to 90%. Toxicity remains a problem with lower dose treatment, with a significantly higher incidence of myeloid leukaemia and bone malignancies in treated patients compared with the normal population.173

### Surgical interventions

#### Total hip arthroplasty

There were numerous prospective cohort studies of total hip replacement (THR) in AS, but RCTs were limited to comparisons between surgical techniques and therefore beyond the scope of this review. The largest case series to date reviewed 340 hips with a mean follow up of 14 years, and showed that 83% of patients reported good to excellent pain relief, and 52% good to excellent functional improvement after the procedure.174 Patients undergoing surgery were younger (mean age 40 years) than comparative cohorts undergoing THR for other indications such as osteoarthritis.175 Results from large databases of THR show that age and sex, independent of joint disease, predict revision.176 However, revision rates in the study group174 were not unduly high, with a 90% survival probability at 10 years, and 65% at 20 years. Joint revisions were also seen to perform well, with a 20 year survival of 61%. Most failures occurred within the first 7 years, and were most often due to prosthesis loosening. A high incidence of heterotopic bone formation and re-ankylosis after THR has been reported in early studies of THR in AS177,178; however, rates are much lower in contemporary studies.179–182

#### Spinal surgery

Surgery for fixed kyphotic deformity causing major disability can give excellent functional results by restoring balance and horizontal vision and relieving intra-abdominal pressure. It is not clear which of the three commonly performed procedures, opening wedge osteotomy, polysegmental wedge osteotomy, and closing wedge osteotomy, gives the best results for any specific indication.183 Correction ranges from 10° to 60° in different series.184–194 Rates of complications vary markedly between studies, opening wedge osteotomy being the only procedure reported to be associated with permanent neurological complications.184 Instrumentation failure has been commonly reported, in up to 33% of cases in one series.187 Surgery for other indications in AS is uncommon, and large series are lacking in the literature. A case review of operative compared with non-operative treatment for spinal fracture with neurological deficit in AS did not show any differences in outcome between the groups. However, the length of hospital stay was shorter in the non-operative group and hence costs were lower in that group.195 Operative results in small case series have shown high mortality (16–29%).196,197

## DISCUSSION

This systematic literature review identified available treatments effective for symptomatic control of spinal pain and physical function in AS. Both NSAIDs and coxibs have large effects on spinal pain and moderate benefit for physical function. TNF inhibitors are effective in patients with active disease, with large benefits seen in pain and function. Results with other traditional DMARDs are less encouraging, without convincing evidence of an effect on the spinal symptoms of AS, although there may be a role for sulfasalazine or methotrexate in the treatment of peripheral joint disease. Total hip arthroplasty is valuable in patients with significant hip disease, and spinal surgery can be useful in selected patients. Non-pharmacological treatments are also supported by current research evidence for maintaining function in patients with AS.

It is less clear if any treatments modify disease progression; this literature review was designed to answer the question “what interventions have an effect on pain or function in AS” and as such was not directed at the effect of treatment on structural changes. Continuing studies of TNF inhibitors in AS over 2 and 3 years are now beginning to answer this important question.

As with any literature review, this study is limited by the unavoidable publication bias associated with clinical trials, where trials with positive results are more frequently published than negative studies. This may have resulted in an overestimation of true clinical efficacy. The variable quality of the reporting of clinical trials before the CONSORT statement for standardisation of the reporting of clinical trials198,199 was published also contributes potential bias—for example, when specific information could not be retrieved from the paper and the authors could not be contacted.

This review is a comprehensive summary of the current “best evidence” available for therapeutic interventions, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological, for the management of AS, and formed the basis for the development of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for management of AS.1

## APPENDIX 1 SEARCH STRATEGY FOR ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS

Database: Ovid MEDLINE(R) <1966 to December Week 4 2004>

Search Strategy:

*   1 exp ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS/ (7445)

*   2 spondyloarthr$.mp. (1620)

*   3 ankylosi$.mp. (8424)

*   4 syndesmophyt$.mp. (113)

*   5 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 (12302)

*   6 limit 5 to human (2433)

## APPENDIX 2 SEARCH STRATEGY FOR TYPES OF EVIDENCE

Database: Ovid MEDLINE(R) <1966 to December Week 4 2004>

Search Strategy:

*   1 systematic review$.mp. (6835)

*   2 exp meta-analysis/ (5713)

*   3 meta-analysis$.mp. [mp = title, abstract, name of substance, mesh subject heading] (14204)

*   4 exp systematic review/ (0)

*   5 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 (19490)

*   6 limit 5 to human (18685)

*   7 cohort stud$.mp. or exp Cohort Studies/ (520224)

*   8 case control stud$.mp. or exp Case-Control Studies/ (277571)

*   9 cross sectional stud$.mp. or exp Cross sectional Studies/ (60617)

*   10 risk ratio$.mp. or exp Odds Ratio/ (25051)

*   11 relative risk$.mp. (27401)

*   12 7 or 8 or 9 or 10 or 11 (811260)

*   13 limit 12 to human (796187)

*   14 exp “Costs and Cost Analysis”/ or exp Cost-Benefit Analysis/ or economic evaluation.mp. or exp Economics, Medical/ (121450)

*   15 cost effectiveness analys$.mp. (2713)

*   16 cost utility analys$.mp. (473)

*   17 cost minimisation analys$.mp. (170)

*   18 cost benefit analys$.mp. (34956)

*   19 cost analys$.mp. (2319)

*   20 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 (122698)

*   21 limit 20 to human (87101)

*   22 exp Randomised Controlled Trials/ or randomised controlled trial$.mp.

*   or exp Clinical Trials/ or exp Random Allocation/ (208880)

*   23 exp Double-Blind Method/ or double blind.mp. or exp Placebos/ (111321)

*   24 single blind.mp. or exp Single-Blind Method/ (11613)

*   25 Comparative Study/ (1188913)

*   26 prospective stud$.mp. or exp Prospective Studies/ (200630)

*   27 follow up stud$.mp. or exp Follow-Up Studies/ (301986)

*   28 22 or 23 or 24 or 25 or 26 or 27 (1769477)

*   29 limit 28 to human (1342425)

*   30 6 or 13 or 21 or 29 (1697116)

## Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of EULAR, and the valuable assistance of the following people in the preparation of this manuscript: H Böhm, R Burgos-Vargas, E Collantes, J Davis, B Dijkmans, P Géher, R Inman, MA Khan, T Kvien, M Leirisalo-Repo, I Olivieri, K Pavelka, J Sieper, G Stucki, R Sturrock, S van der Linden, BJ van Royen, and D Wendling.

## Footnotes

*   **Published Online First 26 August 2005** 

## REFERENCES

1.  **Zochling J**, van der Heijde D, Burgos-Vargas R, Collantes E, Davis J, Dijkmans B, *et al.* ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis2006;65:442–52.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjY1LzQvNDQyIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

2.  **Shekelle PG**, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ1999;318:593–6.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiRlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiIzMTgvNzE4My81OTMiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNjoiL2FubnJoZXVtZGlzLzY1LzQvNDIzLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

3.  **Hedges LV**. Fitting continuous models to effect size data. J Educat Stat1982;7:245–70.
    
    

4.  **Cook RJ**, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ1995;310:452–4.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiRlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiIzMTAvNjk3Ny80NTIiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNjoiL2FubnJoZXVtZGlzLzY1LzQvNDIzLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

5.  **Whitehead A**, Whitehead J. A general parametric approach to the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Stat Med1991;10:1665–77.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/sim.4780101105&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1792461&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1991GU26700003&link_type=ISI) 

6.  **Altman DG**. Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. BMJ1998;317:1309–12.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiRlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEzOiIzMTcvNzE2OC8xMzA5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

7.  **Dagfinrud H**, Kvien TK, Hagen K. Physiotherapy interventions for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2004; (4) :CD002822.
    
    

8.  **Kraag G**, Stokes B, Groh J, Helewa A, Goldsmith C. The effects of comprehensive home physiotherapy and supervision on patients with ankylosing spondylitis—a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol1990;17:228–33.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=2181127&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1990CT20900019&link_type=ISI) 

9.  **Kraag G**, Stokes B, Groh J, Helewa A, Goldsmith CH. The effects of comprehensive home physiotherapy and supervision on patients with ankylosing spondylitis—an 8-month followup. J Rheumatol1994;21:261–3.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8182634&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1994MV89700018&link_type=ISI) 

10. **Hidding A**, van der Linden S, Boers M, Gielen X, de Witte L, Kester A, *et al.* Is group physical therapy superior to individualized therapy in ankylosing spondylitis? A randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res1993;6:117–25.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8130287&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

11. **Bakker C**, Hidding A, van der Linden S, Van Doorslaer E. Cost effectiveness of group physical therapy compared to individualized therapy for ankylosing spondylitis. A randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol1994;21:264–8.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8182635&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1994MV89700019&link_type=ISI) 

12. **Helliwell PS**, Abbott CA, Chamberlain MA. A randomised trial of three different physiotherapy regimes in ankylosing spondylitis. Physiotherapy1996;82:85–90.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66956-8&link_type=DOI) 

13. **Analay Y**, Ozcan E, Karan A, Diracoglu D, Aydin R. The effectiveness of intensive group exercise on patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rehabil2003;17:631–6.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NToic3BjcmUiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMTcvNi82MzEiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNjoiL2FubnJoZXVtZGlzLzY1LzQvNDIzLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

14. **Sweeney S**, Taylor G, Calin A. The effect of a home based exercise intervention package on outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol2002;29:763–6.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjI5LzQvNzYzIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

15. **Lim H - J**, Moon Y - I, Lee MS. Effects of home-based daily exercise therapy on joint mobility, daily activity, pain, and depression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int2005;25:225–9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00296-004-0536-z&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15650833&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000228548600013&link_type=ISI) 

16. **Gemignani G**, Olivieri I, Ruju G, Pasero G. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in ankylosing spondylitis: a double-blind study. Arthritis Rheum1991;34:788–99.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1828944&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1991FR47300022&link_type=ISI) 

17. **Bulstrode SJ**, Barefoot J, Harrison RA, Clarke AK. The role of passive stretching in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol1987;26:40–2.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTI6InJoZXVtYXRvbG9neSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo3OiIyNi8xLzQwIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

18. **Trotta F**, Bassoli J, Manicardi S. Effect of pulsed magnetic fields on the pain of seronegative spondyloarthritis. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg1985;14:183–6.
    
    

19. **Samborski W**, Sobieska M, Mackiewicz T, Stratz T, Mennet M, Muller W. Can thermal therapy of ankylosing spondylitis induce an activation of the disease? Z Rheumatol1992;51:127–31.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1380197&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1992JF58100003&link_type=ISI) 

20. **Zielke VA**, Just L, Schubert M, Tautenhahn B. Objective evaluation of complex balneotherapy based on radon in ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis (summary index of functions). Z Physiother1973;25:113–17.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4721089&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

21. **Hashkes PJ**. Beneficial effect of climatic therapy on inflammatory arthritis at Tiberias Hot Springs. Scand J Rheumatol2002;31:172–7.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12195633&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000176902300010&link_type=ISI) 

22. **Metzger D**, Swingmann C, Protz W, Jackel WH. The whole body cold therapy as analgesic treatment in patients with rheumatic diseases. Rehabilitation2000;39:93–100.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10832164&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

23. **Tishler M**, Brostovski Y, Yaron M. Effect of spa therapy in Tiberias on patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol1995;14:21–5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/BF02208080&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7743740&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995QH71500002&link_type=ISI) 

24. **van Tubergen A**, Landewe R, van der Heijde D, Hidding A, Wolter N, Asscher M, *et al.* Combined spa-exercise therapy is effective in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum2001;45:430–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/1529-0131(200110)45:5<430::AID-ART362>3.0.CO;2-F&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11642642&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000172489000006&link_type=ISI) 

25. **van Tubergen A**, Boonen A, Landewe R, Rutten-van Molken M, van der Heijde D, Hidding A, *et al.* Cost effectiveness of combined spa-exercise therapy in ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum2002;47:459–67.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.10658&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12382292&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000178714400001&link_type=ISI) 

26. **Barlow JH**, Barefoot J. Group education for people with arthritis. Pt Educat Counsel1996;27:257–67.
    
    

27. **Basler HD**, Rehfisch HP. Cognitive-behavioral therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in a German self-help organization. J Psychosom Res1991;35:345–54.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0022-3999(91)90089-7&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1710669&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1991FG09300023&link_type=ISI) 

28. **Krauth C**, Rieger J, Bonisch A, Ehlebracht-Konig I. Costs and benefits of an education program for patients with ankylosing spondylitis as part of an inpatient rehabilitation programs-study design and first results. Z Rheumatol2003;62:II14–16.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=14648082&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

29. **de Buck PDM**, Schoones JW, Allaire SH, Vliet Vlieland TPM. Vocational rehabilitation in patients with chronic rheumatic diseases: a systematic literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum2002;32:196–203.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1053/sarh.2002.34609&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12528084&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000180230000009&link_type=ISI) 

30. **Averns HL**, Oxtoby J, Taylor HG, Jones PW, Dziedzic K, Dawes PT. Smoking and outcome in ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol1996;25:138–42.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3109/03009749609080003&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8668955&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1996UP87600004&link_type=ISI) 

31. **Doran MF**, Brophy S, MacKay K, Taylor G, Calin A. Predictors of longterm outcome in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol2003;30:316–20.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjMwLzIvMzE2IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

32. **Ward MM**. Predictors of the progression of functional disability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol2002;29:1420–5.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjI5LzcvMTQyMCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjI2OiIvYW5ucmhldW1kaXMvNjUvNC80MjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

33. **Ebringer A**, Wilson C. The use of a low starch diet in the treatment of patients suffering from ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol1996;15:62–6.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/BF02231688&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8929779&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1996TV05200013&link_type=ISI) 

34. **Ebringer A**, Baines M, Childerstone M, Ghuloom M, Ptaszynska T. Etiopathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis and the cross-tolerance hypothesis. Adv Inflamm Res1985;9:101–28.
    
    

35. **Appelboom T**, Durez P. Effect of milk product deprivation on spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis1994;53:481–2.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czoxMToiYW5ucmhldW1kaXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiNTMvNy80ODEiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNjoiL2FubnJoZXVtZGlzLzY1LzQvNDIzLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

36. **Dougados M**, Nguyen M, Caporal R, Legeais J, Bouxin-Sauzet A, Pellegri-Guegnault B, *et al.* Ximoprofen in ankylosing spondylitis. A double blind placebo controlled dose ranging study. Scand J Rheumatol1994;23:243–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3109/03009749409103723&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7973477&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1994PQ59300004&link_type=ISI) 

37. **Dougados M**, Caporal R, Doury P, Thiesce A, Pattin S, Laffez B, *et al.* A double blind crossover placebo controlled trial of ximoprofen in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol1989;16:1167–9.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=2685299&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1989AN71800045&link_type=ISI) 

38. **Jajic I**, Nekora A, Chadri HA. Pirprofen, indomethacin and placebo in ankylosing spondylitis. Double-blind comparison. Nouv Presse Med1982;11:2491–3.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=6752873&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1982PF61900017&link_type=ISI) 

39. **Calcraft B**, Tildesley G, Evans KT, Gravelle H, Hole D, Lloyd KN. Azapropazone in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a controlled clinical trial. Rheumatol Rehabil1974;13:23–9.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4604141&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1974S821700005&link_type=ISI) 

40. **Sturrock RD**, Hart FD. Double-blind cross-over comparison of indomethacin, flurbiprofen, and placebo in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis1974;33:129–31.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czoxMToiYW5ucmhldW1kaXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMzMvMi8xMjkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNjoiL2FubnJoZXVtZGlzLzY1LzQvNDIzLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

41. **Dougados M**, Gueguen A, Nakache JP, Velicitat P, Veys EM, Zeidler H, *et al.* Ankylosing spondylitis: what is the optimum duration of a clinical study? A one year versus a 6 weeks non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug trial. Rheumatology (Oxford)1999;38:235–44.
    
    

42. **Dougados M**, Behier JM, Jolchine I, Calin A, van der Heijde D, Olivieri I, *et al.* Efficacy of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase 2-specific inhibitor, in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a six-week controlled study with comparison against placebo and against a conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug. Arthritis Rheum2001;44:180–5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/1529-0131(200101)44:1<180::AID-ANR24>3.0.CO;2-K&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11212158&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000166659100023&link_type=ISI) 

43. **van der Heijde D**, Baraf HSB, Ramos-Remus C, Calin A, Weaver AL, Schiff M, *et al.* Evaluation of the efficacy of etoricoxib in ankylosing spondylitis: results of a 52-week randomized controlled study. Arthritis Rheum2005;52:1205–15.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.20985&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15818702&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000228688200026&link_type=ISI) 

44. **Gossec L**, van der Heijde D, Melian A, Krupa DA, James MK, Cavanaugh PF, *et al.* Efficacy of cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibition by etoricoxib and naproxen on the axial manifestations of ankylosing spondylitis in the presence of peripheral arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis2005;64:1563–7.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI2NC8xMS8xNTYzIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

45. **Ansell BM**, Major G, Liyanage SP, Gumpel JM, Seifert MH, Mathews JA, *et al.* A comparative study of Butacote and Naprosyn in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis1978;37:436–9.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjM3LzUvNDM2IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

46. **Astorga G**. Double-blind, parallel clinical trial of tenoxicam (Ro 12-0068) versus piroxicam in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Eur J Rheum Inflamm1987;9:70–3.
    
    

47. **Batlle-Gualda E**, Figueroa M, Ivorra J, Raber A. The efficacy and tolerability of aceclofenac in the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a multicenter controlled clinical trial. Aceclofenac Indomethacin Study Group. J Rheumatol1996;23:1200–6.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8823693&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1996UV68100015&link_type=ISI) 

48. **Bernstein RM**, Calin HJ, Ollier S, Calin A. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of lornoxicam and indomethacin in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur J Rheum Inflamm1992;12:6–13.
    
    

49. **Bird HA**, Rhind VM, Pickup ME, Wright V. A comparative study of benoxaprofen and indomethacin in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol1980;6:139–42.
    
    

50. **Calin A**, Grahame R. Double-bind cross-over tiral of flurbiprofen and phenylbutazone in ankylosing spondylitis. BMJ1974;4:496–9.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI0LzU5NDMvNDk2IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

51. **Carcassi C**, La Nasa G, Perpignano G. A 12-week double-blind study of the efficacy, safety and tolerance of pirazolac b.i.d. compared with indomethacin t.i.d. in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Drugs Exptl Clin Res1990;16:29–37.
    
    

52. **Charlot J**, Villiaumey J. A comparative study of benoxaprofen and ketoprofen in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur J Rheum Inflamm1982;5:277–81.
    
    

53. **Doury P**, Roux H. Isoxicam vs ketoprofen in ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Clin Pharmacol1986;22 (suppl 2) :157–60S.
    
    

54. **Franssen MJ**, Gribnau FW, van de Putte LB. A comparison of diflunisal and phenylbutazone in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol1986;5:210–20.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/BF02032359&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3524970&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1986D220900006&link_type=ISI) 

55. **Harkness AJ**, Burry HC, Grahame R. A trial of feprazone in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Rehabil1977;16:158–61.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=333540&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1977DW15900006&link_type=ISI) 

56. **Jessop JD**. Double-blind study of ketoprofen and phenylbutazone in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Rehabil1976; (suppl) :37–42.
    
    

57. **Khan MA**. Diclofenac in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: review of worldwide clinical experience and report of a double-blind comparison with indomethacin. Semin Arthritis Rheum1985;15:80–4.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4081795&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1985AUN6900014&link_type=ISI) 

58. **Lomen PL**, Turner LF, Lamborn KR, Brinn EL, Sattler LP. Flurbiprofen in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. A comparison with phenylbutazone. Am J Med1986;80:120–6.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3511691&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1986A271700020&link_type=ISI) 

59. **Myklebust G**. Comparison of naproxen and piroxicam in rheumatoid arthritis and Bechterew’s syndrome. A double-blind parallel multicenter study. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen1986;106:1485–7.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3532419&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

60. **Nahir AM**, Scharf Y. A comparative study of diclofenac and sulindac in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Rehabil1980;19:193–8.
    
    

61. **Nissila M**, Kajander A. Proquazone (Biarison) and indomethacin (Indocid) in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Two comparative, clinical, double-blind studies. Scand J Rheumatol1978;21:36–9.
    
    

62. **Palferman TG**, Webley M. A comparative study of nabumetone and indomethacin in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur J Rheum Inflamm1991;11:23–9.
    
    

63. **Pasero G**, Ruju G, Marcolongo R, Senesi M, Serni U, Mannoni A, *et al.* Aceclofenac versus naproxen in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a double-blind, controlled study. Curr Ther Res1994;55:833–42.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0011-393X(05)80777-5&link_type=DOI) 

64. **Renier JC**, Fournier M, Loyau G, Roux H. Ankylosing spondylitis. Comparative trial of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents: pirprofen and ketoprofen, Nouv Presse Med1982;11:2494–6.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=6752874&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1982PF61900018&link_type=ISI) 

65. **Schattenkirchner M**, Kruger K. NSAIDs in ankylosing spondylitis. The importance of tolerability during long-term treatment. Therapiewoche1992;42:438–49.
    
    

66. **Schwarzer AC**, Cohen M, Arnold MH, Kelly D, McNaught P, Brooks PM. Tenoxicam compared with diclofenac in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Med Res Opin1990;11:648–53.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=2178870&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1990CR23200005&link_type=ISI) 

67. **Simpson MR**, Simpson NR, Scott BO, Beatty DC. A controlled study of flufenamic acid in ankylosing spondylitis. A preliminary report. Ann Phys Med1966; (suppl) :126–8.
    
    

68. **Stollenwerk R**, von Criegern T, Gierend M, Schilling F. Therapy of ankylosing spondylitis. Short-term use of piroxicam suppositories or indomethacin suppositories and retard capsules. Fortschr Med1985;103:561–5.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3874137&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1985AHU6000010&link_type=ISI) 

69. **Villa Alcazar LF**, de Buergo M, Rico LH, Montull FE. Aceclofenac is as safe and effective as tenoxicam in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a 3 month multicenter comparative trial. Spanish Study Group on Aceclofenac in Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol1996;23:1194–9.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8823692&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1996UV68100014&link_type=ISI) 

70. **Wasner C**, Britton MC, Kraines RG, Kaye RL, Bobrove AM, Fries JF. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. JAMA1981;246:2168–72.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.1981.03320190026021&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7026817&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1981MP46600015&link_type=ISI) 

71. **Zhang W**, Doherty M, Arden N, Bannwarth B, Bijlsma J, Gunther KP, *et al.* EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis2005;64:669–81.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjY0LzUvNjY5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

72. **Bollini P**, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Perez GS, Walker AM. The impact of research quality and study design on epidemiologic estimates of the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on upper gastrointestinal tract disease. Arch Intern Med1992;152:1289–95.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archinte.1992.00400180139023&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1534651&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1992HY95700023&link_type=ISI) 

73. **Gabriel SE**, Jaakkimainen L, Bombardier C. Risk for serious gastrointestinal complications related to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med1991;115:787–96.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.7326/0003-4819-115-10-787&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1834002&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1991GP80000009&link_type=ISI) 

74. **Garcia Rodriguez LA**. Variability in risk of gastrointestinal complications with different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Med1998;104:30–4S.
    
    

75. **Lewis SC**, Langman MJ, Laporte JR, Matthews JN, Rawlins MD, Wiholm BE. Dose-response relationships between individual nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NANSAIDs) and serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Br J Clin Pharmacol2002;54:320–6.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01636.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12236853&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000178081300012&link_type=ISI) 

76. **Ofman JJ**, MacLean CH, Straus WL, Morton SC, Berger ML, Roth EA, *et al.* A metaanalysis of severe upper gastrointestinal complications of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. J Rheumatol2002;29:804–12.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjI5LzQvODA0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

77. **Tramer MR**, Moore RA, Reynolds DJ, McQuay HJ. Quantitative estimation of rare adverse events which follow a biological progression: a new model applied to chronic NSAID use. Pain2000;85:169–82.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00267-5&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10692616&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000085652900021&link_type=ISI) 

78. **Capurso L**, Koch M. Prevention of NSAID-induced gastric lesions: H2 antagonists or misoprostol? A meta-analysis of controlled clinical studies. Clin Ter1991;139:179–89.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1686995&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

79. **Koch M**, Dezi A, Ferrario F, Capurso I. Prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal mucosal injury. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Arch Intern Med1996;156:2321–32.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archinte.1996.00440190069008&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8911239&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1996VR60300006&link_type=ISI) 

80. **Leandro G**, Pilotto A, Franceschi M, Bertin T, Lichino E, Di Mario F. Prevention of acute NSAID-related gastroduodenal damage: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Dig Dis Sci2001;46:1924–36.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1023/A:1010687115298&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11575445&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000171116200015&link_type=ISI) 

81. **Rostom A**, Wells G, Tugwell P, Welch V, Dube C, McGowan J. The prevention of chronic NSAID induced upper gastrointestinal toxicity: a Cochrane collaboration metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol2000;27:2203–14.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10990235&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000089146200024&link_type=ISI) 

82. **Shield MJ**. Diclofenac/misoprostol: novel findings and their clinical potential. J Rheumatol1998;25:31–41.
    
    

83. **Deeks JJ**, Smith LA, Bradley MD. Efficacy, tolerability, and upper gastrointestinal safety of celecoxib for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ2002;325:619–23.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEyOiIzMjUvNzM2NS82MTkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNjoiL2FubnJoZXVtZGlzLzY1LzQvNDIzLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

84. **Juni P**, Nartey L, Reichenbach S, Sterchi R, Dieppe PA, Egger M. Risk of cardiovascular events and rofecoxib: cumulative meta-analysis. Lancet2004;364:2021–9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17514-4&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15582059&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000225495700025&link_type=ISI) 

85. **Bresalier RS**, Sandler RS, Quan H, Bolognese JA, Oxenius B, Horgan K, *et al.* Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial. N Engl J Med2005;352:1092–102.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa050493&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15713943&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000227655000006&link_type=ISI) 

86. **Solomon SD**, McMurray JJV, Pfeffer MA, Wittes J, Fowler R, Finn P, *et al.* Cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib in a clinical trial for colorectal adenoma prevention. N Engl J Med2005;352:1071–80.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa050405&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15713944&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000227655000004&link_type=ISI) 

87. **Nussmeier NA**, Whelton AA, Brown MT, Langford RM, Hoeft A, Parlow JL, *et al.* Complications of the COX-2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med2005;352:1081–91.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa050330&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15713945&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000227655000005&link_type=ISI) 

88. **Pal B**. Use of simple analgesics in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol1987;26:207–9.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTI6InJoZXVtYXRvbG9neSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIyNi8zLzIwNyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjI2OiIvYW5ucmhldW1kaXMvNjUvNC80MjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

89. **Maugars Y**, Mathis C, Berthelot JM, Charlier C, Prost A. Assessment of the efficacy of sacroiliac corticosteroid injections in spondylarthropathies: a double-blind study. Br J Rheumatol1996;35:767–70.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTI6InJoZXVtYXRvbG9neSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIzNS84Lzc2NyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjI2OiIvYW5ucmhldW1kaXMvNjUvNC80MjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

90. **Luukkainen R**, Nissila M, Asikainen E, Sanila M, Lehtinen K, Alanaatu A, *et al.* Periarticular corticosteroid treatment of the sacroiliac joint in patients with seronegative spondylarthropathy. Clin Exp Rheumatol1999;17:88–90.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10084038&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000078641900015&link_type=ISI) 

91. **Green M**, Marzo-Ortega H, Wakefield RJ, Astin P, Proudman S, Conaghan PG, *et al.* Predictors of outcome in patients with oligoarthritis: results of a protocol of intraarticular corticosteroids to all clinically active joints. Arthritis Rheum2001;44:1177–83.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/1529-0131(200105)44:5<1177::AID-ANR201>3.0.CO;2-5&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11352252&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000171751000026&link_type=ISI) 

92. **Ejstrup L**, Peters ND. Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy in ankylosing spondylitis. Dan Med Bull1985;32:231–3.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4042697&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1985APL7500004&link_type=ISI) 

93. **Mintz G**, Enriquez RD, Mercado U, Robles EJ, Jimenez FJ, Gutierrez G. Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy in severe ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum1981;24:734–6.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.1780240521&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7236329&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1981LQ71500017&link_type=ISI) 

94. **Richter MB**, Woo P, Panayi GS, Trull A, Unger A, Shepherd P. The effects of intravenous pulse methylprednisolone on immunological and inflammatory processes in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol1983;53:51–9.
    
    

95. **Peters ND**, Ejstrup L. Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy in ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol1992;21:134–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3109/03009749209095085&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1604251&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1992HX52400007&link_type=ISI) 

96. **Chen J**, Liu C. Sulfasalazine for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2005; (2) :CD004800.
    
    

97. **Dougados M**, van der Linden S, Leirisalo-Repo M, Huitfeldt B, Juhlin R, Veys E, *et al.* Sulfasalazine in the treatment of spondylarthropathy. A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum1995;38:618–27.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.1780380507&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7748217&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995QX39200006&link_type=ISI) 

98. **Clegg DO**, Reda DJ, Abdellatif M. Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo for the treatment of axial and peripheral articular manifestations of the seronegative spondylarthropathies: a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative study. Arthritis Rheum1999;42:2325–9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/1529-0131(199911)42:11<2325::AID-ANR10>3.0.CO;2-C&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10555027&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000083467800010&link_type=ISI) 

99. **Kirwan J**, Edwards A, Huitfeldt B, Thompson P, Currey H. The course of established ankylosing spondylitis and the effects of sulphasalazine over 3 years. Br J Rheumatol1993;32:729–33.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTI6InJoZXVtYXRvbG9neSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIzMi84LzcyOSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjI2OiIvYW5ucmhldW1kaXMvNjUvNC80MjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

100.**Lehtinen A**, Leirisalo-Repo M, Taavitsainen M. Persistence of enthesopathic changes in patients with spondyloarthropathy during a 6-month follow-up. Clin Exp Rheumatol1995;13:733–6.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8835246&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995TL34700009&link_type=ISI) 

101.**Dekker-Saeys BJ**, Dijkmans BA, Tytgat GN. Treatment of spondyloarthropathy with 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalazine): an open trial. J Rheumatol2000;27:723–6.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10743816&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000085700400030&link_type=ISI) 

102.**Chen J**, Liu C. Methotrexate for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2004; (3) :CD004524.
    
    

103.**Altan L**, Bingol U, Karakoc Y, Aydiner S, Yurtkuran M, Yurtkuran M. Clinical investigation of methotrexate in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Scand J Rheumatol2001;30:255–9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/030097401753180318&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11727838&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000171954000002&link_type=ISI) 

104.**Roychowdhury B**, Bintley-Bagot S, Bulgen DY, Thompson RN, Tunn EJ, Moots RJ. Is methotrexate effective in ankylosing spondylitis? Rheumatology (Oxford)2002;41:1330–2.
    
    

105.**Gonzalez-Lopez L**, Garcia-Gonzalez A, Vazquez-Del-Mercado M, Munoz-Valle JF, Gamez-Nava JI. Efficacy of methotrexate in ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial. J Rheumatol2004;31:1568–74.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjMxLzgvMTU2OCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjI2OiIvYW5ucmhldW1kaXMvNjUvNC80MjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

106.**Pišev K**, Æirkoviæ M, Glišiæ B, Popoviæ R, Stefanoviæ D. Efficacy of low dose methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with arthritis [abstract]. J Rheumatol2001;28:59.
    
    

107.**Davies H**. Methotrexate as a steroid sparing agent for asthma in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2004; (2) :CD000391.
    
    

108.**Suarez-Almazor M**, Belseck E, Shea B, Wells G, Tugwell P. Methotrexate for treating rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2004; (2) :CD000957.
    
    

109.**Takken T**. Methotrexate for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2004; (4) :CD003129.
    
    

110.**Alfadhli A**, McDonald J, Feagan B. Methotrexate for induction of remission in refractory Crohn’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2004; (1) :CD003459.
    
    

111.**Ortiz Z**. Folic acid and folinic acid for reducing side effects in patients receiving methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev1999; (4) :CD000951.
    
    

112.**Ward MM**, Kuzis S. Medication toxicity among patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum2002;47:234–41.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.10399&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12115151&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000176197600003&link_type=ISI) 

113.**Maksymowych WP**, Jhangri GS, LeClercq S, Skeith KJ, Yan A, Russell AS. An open study of pamidronate in the treatment of refractory ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol1998;25:714–17.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9558174&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000072974500018&link_type=ISI) 

114.**Maksymowych WP**, Lambert R, Jhangri GS, LeClercq S, Chiu P, Wong B, *et al.* Clinical and radiological amelioration of refractory peripheral spondyloarthritis by pulse intravenous pamidronate therapy. J Rheumatol2001;28:144–55.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjI4LzEvMTQ0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

115.**Haibel H**, Brandt J, Rudwaleit M, Soerensen H, Sieper J, Braun J. Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with pamidronate. Rheumatology (Oxford)2003;42:1018–20.
    
    

116.**Cairns AP**, Wright SA, Taggart AJ, Coward SM, Wright GD. An open study of pulse pamidronate treatment in severe ankylosing spondylitis, and its effect on biochemical markers of bone turnover. Ann Rheum Dis2005;64:338–9.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiRlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjY0LzIvMzM4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

117.**Maksymowych WP**, Jhangri GS, Fitzgerald AA, LeClercq S, Chiu P, Yan A, *et al.* A six-month randomized, controlled, double-blind, dose-response comparison of intravenous pamidronate (60 mg versus 10 mg) in the treatment of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-refractory ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum2002;46:766–73.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.10139&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11920413&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000174409200024&link_type=ISI) 

118.**Maksymowych WP**, Jhangri GS, LeClercq S, Skeith K, Yan A, Russell AS. An open study of pamidronate in the treatment of refractory ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol1998;25:714–17.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9558174&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000072974500018&link_type=ISI) 

119.**Adami S**, Bhalla AK, Dorizzi R, Montesanti F, Rosini S, Salvagno G, *et al.* The acute-phase response after bisphosphonate administration. Calcif Tiss Int1987;41:326–31.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/BF02556671&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3124942&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1987L373600007&link_type=ISI) 

120.**Wei JC**, Chan TW, Lin H, Huang F, Chou C. Thalidomide for severe refractory ankylosing spondylitis: a 6-month open-label trial. J Rheumatol2003;30:2627–31.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiIzMC8xMi8yNjI3IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

121.**Huang F**, Gu J, Zhao W, Zhu J, Zhang J, Yu DTY. One-year open-label trial of thalidomide in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Care Res2002;47:15.
    
    

122.**Geher P**, Gomor B. Repeated cyclosporine therapy of peripheral arthritis associated with ankylosing spondylitis. Med Sci Monitor2001;7:105–7.
    
    

123.**Durez P**, Horsmans Y. Dramatic response after an intravenous loading dose of azathioprine in one case of severe and refractory ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford)2000;39:182–4.
    
    

124.**Giordano M**. Long-term prophylaxis of recurring spondylitic iridocyclitis with antimalarials and non-steroidal antiphlogistics. Z Rheumatol1982;41:105–6.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7202309&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1982NY83600006&link_type=ISI) 

125.**Grasedyck K**, Schattenkirchner M, Bandilla K. The treatment of ankylosing spondylitis with auranofin (Ridaura). Z Rheumatol1990;49:98–9.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=2190436&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1990DC67900007&link_type=ISI) 

126.**Sadowska-Wroblewska M**, Garwolinska H, Maczynska-Rusiniak B. A trial of cyclophosphamide in ankylosing spondylitis with involvement of peripheral joints and high disease activity. Scand J Rheumatol1986;15:259–64.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3541169&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1986F387500007&link_type=ISI) 

127.**Fricke R**, Petersen D. Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis with cyclophosphamide and azathioprine. Verh Dtsch Ges Rheumatol1969;1:189–95.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=5403645&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

128.**Van Denderen JC**, van der Paardt M, Nurmohamed MT, de Ryck YMMA, Dijkmans BAC, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE. Double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study of leflunomide in the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis2005;64:1761–4.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI2NC8xMi8xNzYxIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

129.**Haibel H**, Rudwaleit M, Braun J, Sieper J. Six months open label trial of leflunomide in active ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis2005;64:124–6.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjY0LzEvMTI0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

130.**Steven MM**, Morrison M, Sturrock RD. Penicillamine in ankylosing spondylitis: a double blind placebo controlled trial. J Rheumatol1985;12:735–7.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3903158&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1985ARH6800018&link_type=ISI) 

131.**Bird HA**, Dixon AS. Failure of D-penicillamine to affect peripheral joint involvement in ankylosing spondylitis or HLA B27-associated arthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis1977;36:289.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czoxMToiYW5ucmhldW1kaXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMzYvMy8yODkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNjoiL2FubnJoZXVtZGlzLzY1LzQvNDIzLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

132.**Jaffe IA**. Penicillamine in seronegative polyarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis1977;36:593–4.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czoxMToiYW5ucmhldW1kaXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMzYvNi81OTMiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNjoiL2FubnJoZXVtZGlzLzY1LzQvNDIzLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

133.**Gorman JD**, Sack KE, Davis JC Jr. Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis by inhibition of tumor necrosis factor alpha. N Engl J Med2002;346:1349–56.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa012664&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11986408&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000175279000002&link_type=ISI) 

134.**Davis JC Jr**, van der Heijde D, Braun J, Dougados M, Cush J, Clegg DO, *et al.* Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor (etanercept) for treating ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum2003;48:3230–6.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.11325&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=14613288&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000186451100031&link_type=ISI) 

135.**Brandt J**, Khariouzov A, Listing J, Haibel H, Sorensen H, Grassnickel L, *et al.* Six-month results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum2003;48:1667–75.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.11017&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12794835&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000183410300026&link_type=ISI) 

136.**Calin A**, Dijkmans BA, Emery P, Hakala M, Kalden J, Leirisalo-Repo M, *et al.* Outcomes of a multicentre randomised clinical trial of etanercept to treat ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis2004;63:1594–600.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI2My8xMi8xNTk0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

137.**Braun J**, Brandt J, Listing J, Zink A, Alten R, Golder W, *et al.* Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet2002;359:1187–93.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08215-6&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11955536&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000174846300008&link_type=ISI) 

138.**van der Heijde D**, Dijkmans B, Geusens P, Sieper J, DeWoody K, Williamson P, *et al.* Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Results of a randomized controlled trial (ASSERT). Arthritis Rheum2005;52:582–91.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.20852&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15692973&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000226910100026&link_type=ISI) 

139.**Haibel H**, Brandt HC, Rudwaleit M, Listing J, Braun J, Kupper H, *et al.* Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis: preliminary results of an open-label, 20-week trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum2004;50:S217.
    
    

140.**Lee J - H**, Slifman NR, Gershon SK, Edwards ET, Schwieterman WD, Siegel JN, *et al.* Life-threatening histoplasmosis complicating immunotherapy with tumor necrosis factor a antagonists infliximab and etanercept. Arthritis Rheum2002;46:2565–70.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.10583&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12384912&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000178633500004&link_type=ISI) 

141.**Slifman NR**, Gershon SK, Lee J – H, Edwards ET, Braun MM. Listeria monocytogenes infection as a complication of treatment with tumor necrosis factor a-neutralizing agents. Arthritis Rheum2003;48:319–24.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.10758&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12571839&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000180958200006&link_type=ISI) 

142.**Keystone EC**. Safety issues related to emerging therapies for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol2004;22:S148–50.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15552529&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000224406600023&link_type=ISI) 

143.**Baeten D**, Kruithof E, Van den Bosch F, Van den Bossche N, Herssens A, Mielants H, *et al.* Systematic safety follow up in a cohort of 107 patients with spondyloarthropathy treated with infliximab: a new perspective on the role of host defence in the pathogenesis of the disease? Ann Rheum Dis2003;62:829–34.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjYyLzkvODI5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

144.**Gomez-Reino JJ**, Carmona L, Valverde VR, Mola EM, Montero MD, BIOBADASER Group. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors may predispose to significant increase in tuberculosis risk: a multicenter active-surveillance report. Arthritis Rheum2003;48:2122–7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/art.11137&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12905464&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000184585000006&link_type=ISI) 

145.**Mohan N**, Edwards ET, Cupps TR, Oliverio PJ, Sandberg G, Crayton H, *et al.* Demyelination occurring during anti-tumor necrosis factor a therapy for inflammatory arthritides. Arthritis Rheum2001;44:2862–9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/1529-0131(200112)44:12<2862::AID-ART474>3.0.CO;2-W&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11762947&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000172634900019&link_type=ISI) 

146.**Ferraccioli GF**, Assaloni R, Perin A, Shakoor N, Block JA, Mohan AK, *et al.* Drug-induced systemic lupus erythematosus and TNF-a blockers (multiple letters). Lancet2002;360:645–6.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12241962&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000177600400039&link_type=ISI) 

147.**Shakoor N**, Michalska M, Harris CA, Block JA. Drug-induced systemic lupus erythematosus associated with etanercept therapy. Lancet2002;359:579–80.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07714-0&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11867114&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000173943600013&link_type=ISI) 

148.**Cairns AP**, Duncan MKJ, Hinder AE, Taggart AJ. New onset systemic lupus erythematosus in a patient receiving etanercept for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis2002;61:1031–2.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiRlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI2MS8xMS8xMDMxIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

149.**Chung ES**, Packer M, Lo KH, Fasanmade AA, Willerson JT, Anti-TNF Therapy Against Congestive Heart Failure Investigators. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-alpha, in patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure: results of the anti-TNF Therapy Against Congestive Heart Failure (ATTACH) trial. Circulation2003;107:3133–40.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTQ6ImNpcmN1bGF0aW9uYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjExOiIxMDcvMjUvMzEzMyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjI2OiIvYW5ucmhldW1kaXMvNjUvNC80MjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

150.**Coletta AP**, Clark AL, Banarjee P, Cleland JG. Clinical trials update: RENEWAL (RENAISSANCE and RECOVER) and ATTACH. Eur J Heart Failure2002;4:559–61.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S1388-9842(02)00121-6&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12167397&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000177980400024&link_type=ISI) 

151.**Wolfe F**, Michaud MS. Congestive heart failure in rheumatoid arthritis: rates, predictors and the effect of anti-TNF therapy. Am J Med2004;116:311.
    
    

152.**Tan AL**, Marzo-Ortega H, O’Connor P, Fraser A, Emery P, McGonagle D. Efficacy of anakinra in active ankylosing spondylitis: A clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Ann Rheum Dis2004;63:1041–5.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjYzLzkvMTA0MSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjI2OiIvYW5ucmhldW1kaXMvNjUvNC80MjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

153.**Haibel H**, Rudwaleit M, Listing J, Sieper J. Open label trial of anakinra in active ankylosing spondylitis over 24 weeks. Ann Rheum Dis2005;64:296–8.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjY0LzIvMjk2IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

154.**Schuler B**, Dihlmann W. Results of x-ray treatment in ankylosing spondylitis. Verh Dtsch Ges Rheumatol1969;1:124–32.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=5403638&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

155.**Wilkinson M**, Bywaters EG. Clinical features and course of ankylosing spondylitis; as seen in a follow-up of 222 hospital referred cases. Ann Rheum Dis1958;17:209–28.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czoxMToiYW5ucmhldW1kaXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMTcvMi8yMDkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyNjoiL2FubnJoZXVtZGlzLzY1LzQvNDIzLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

156.**Fulton JS**. Ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Radiol1961;12:132–5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0009-9260(61)80073-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=13702574&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

157.**Desmarais MHL**. Radiotherapy in arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis1953;12:25–8.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czoxMToiYW5ucmhldW1kaXMiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6NzoiMTIvMS8yNSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjI2OiIvYW5ucmhldW1kaXMvNjUvNC80MjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

158.**Brown WMC**, Doll R. Mortality from cancer and other causes after radiotherapy for ankylosing spondylitis. BMJ1965;ii:1327–32.
    
    

159.**Weiss HA**, Darby SC, Fearn T, Doll R. Leukemia mortality after X-ray treatment for ankylosing spondylitis. Radiat Res1995;142:1–11.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7899552&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995QP25100001&link_type=ISI) 

160.**Weiss HA**, Darby SC, Doll R. Cancer mortality following X-ray treatment for ankylosing spondylitis. Int J Cancer1994;59:327–38.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7927937&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1994PP77600006&link_type=ISI) 

161.**Kaprove RE**, Little AH, Graham DC, Rosen PS. Ankylosing spondylitis: survival in men with and without radiotherapy. Arthritis Rheum1980;23:57–61.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7352944&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1980JC96300009&link_type=ISI) 

162.**Weiss HA**, Darby SC, Fearn T, Doll R. Leukemia mortality after X-ray treatment for ankylosing spondylitis. Radiat Res1995;142:1–11.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7899552&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995QP25100001&link_type=ISI) 

163.**Weiss HA**, Darby SC, Doll R. Cancer mortality following X-ray treatment for ankylosing spondylitis. Int J Cancer1994;59:327–38.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7927937&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1994PP77600006&link_type=ISI) 

164.**Nekolla EA**, Kellerer AM, Kuse-Isingschulte M, Eder E, Spiess H. Malignancies in patients treated with high doses of radium-224. Radiation Res1999;152 (suppl) :S3–7.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10564925&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000084240000002&link_type=ISI) 

165.**Kommission Pharmakotherapie**. Position of the German Society of Rheumatology on therapy of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with radium chloride (224SpondylAT). Z Rheumatol2001;60:84–7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s003930170078&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11383053&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000168643700012&link_type=ISI) 

166.**Koch W**. Indications and results of radium 224 (thorium X) therapy of ankylosing spondylitis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb1978;116:608–16.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=100981&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1978FP46700143&link_type=ISI) 

167.**Schmitt E**. Long-term study on the therapeutic effect of radium 224 in Bechterew’s disease. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb1978;116:621–4.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=706638&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1978FP46700146&link_type=ISI) 

168.**Schmitt E**, Ruckbeil C, Wick RR. Long-term clinical investigation of patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with 224Ra. Health Physics1983;44 (suppl 1) :197–202.
    
    

169.**Knop J**, Stritzke P, Heller M, Redeker S, Crone-Munzebrock W. Results of radium 224 therapy in ankylosing spondylitis (Strumpell-Marie-Bechterew disease). Z Rheumatol1982;41:272–5.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=6819735&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1982PW46700007&link_type=ISI) 

170.**Redeker S**, Crone-Munzebrock W, Weh L, Montz R. Scintigraphic, radiologic and clinical results after radium 224 therapy in 53 patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Beitr Orthop Traumatol1982;29:218–33.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7103914&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

171.**Biskop M**, Arnold W, Weber C, Reinwald AK, Reinwald H. Can radium 224 (thorium X) effect the progression of Bechterew’s disease? Beitr Orthop Traumatol1983;30:374–81.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=6626127&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

172.**Seyfarth H**. Experience with treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in the GDR: radium-224 therapy. Akt Rheumatol1987;12:26–9.
    
    

173.**Wick RR**, Nekolla EA, Gossner W, Kellerer AM. Late effects in ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with 224Ra. R*adiat Res*1999;152:S8–11.
    
    

174.**Sweeney S**, Gupta R, Taylor G, Calin A. Total hip arthroplasty in ankylosing spondylitis: outcome in 340 patients. J Rheumatol2001;28:1862–6.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NjoianJoZXVtIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjI4LzgvMTg2MiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjI2OiIvYW5ucmhldW1kaXMvNjUvNC80MjMuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

175.**Ingvarsson T**, Hagglund G, Jonsson H Jr, Lohmander LS. Incidence of total hip replacement for primary osteoarthrosis in Iceland 1982–1996. Acta Orthop Scand1999;70:229–33.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10429596&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000081378100001&link_type=ISI) 

176.**Furnes O**, Lie SA, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987–99. J Bone Joint Surg Br2001;83:579–86.
    
    

177.**Walker LG**, Sledge CB. Total hip arthroplasty in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res1991;262:198–204.
    
    

178.**Wilde AH**, Collins HR, Mackenzie AH. Reankylosis of the hip joint in ankylosing spondylitis after total hip replacement. Arthritis Rheum1972;15:493–6.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=4634802&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1972N838200003&link_type=ISI) 

179.**Brinker MR**, Rosenberg AG, Kull L, Cox DD. Primary noncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: clinical and radiographic results at an average follow-up period of 6 years. J Arthroplasty1996;11:802–12.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80180-X&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8934320&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1996VU24900007&link_type=ISI) 

180.**Bhan S**, Malhotra R. Bipolar hip arthroplasty in ankylosing spondylitis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg1996;115:94–9.
    
    

181.**Diaz de Rada P**, Barroso-Diaz JL, Valenti JR. Follow-up of the outcome of hip arthroplasty in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rev Ortop Traumatol2004;48:340–4.
    
    

182.**Sochart DH**, Porter ML. Long-term results of total hip replacement in young patients who had ankylosing spondylitis. Eighteen to thirty-year results with survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am1997;79:1181–9.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9278078&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

183.**Van Royen BJ**, De Gast A. Lumbar osteotomy for correction of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. A structured review of three methods of treatment. Ann Rheum Dis1999;58:399–406.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTE6ImFubnJoZXVtZGlzIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjU4LzcvMzk5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjY6Ii9hbm5yaGV1bWRpcy82NS80LzQyMy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

184.**Bradford DS**, Schumacher WL, Lonstein JE, Winter RB. Ankylosing spondylitis: experience in surgical management of 21 patients. Spine1987;12:590–2.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00007632-198707000-00016&link_type=DOI) 

185.**Camargo FP**, Cordeiro EN, Napoli MM. Corrective osteotomy of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Experience with 66 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res1986;208:157–67.
    
    

186.**Weale AE**, Marsh CH, Yeoman PM. Secure fixation of lumbar osteotomy. Surgical experience with 50 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res1995;321:216–22.
    
    

187.**Van Royen BJ**, de Kleuver M, Slot GH. Polysegmental lumbar posterior wedge osteotomies for correction of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J1998;7:104–10.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s005860050039&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9629933&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

188.**Hehne HJ**, Zielke K, Bohm H. Polysegmental lumbar osteotomies and transpedicled fixation for correction of long-curved kyphotic deformities in ankylosing spondylitis. Report on 177 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res1990;258:49–55.
    
    

189.**Halm H**, Metz-Stavenhagen P, Zielke K. Results of surgical correction of kyphotic deformities of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis on the basis of the modified arthritis impact measurement scales. Spine1995;20:1612–19.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7570177&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995RK23300010&link_type=ISI) 

190.**Thiranont N**, Netrawichien P. Transpedicular decancellation closed wedge vertebral osteotomy for treatment of fixed flexion deformity of spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Spine1993;18:2517–22.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8303457&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1993ML76000023&link_type=ISI) 

191.**Van Royen BJ**, Slot GH. Closing-wedge posterior osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis. Partial corporectomy and transpedicular fixation in 22 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br1995;77:117–21.
    
    

192.**Chen IH**, Chien JT, Yu TC. Transpedicular wedge osteotomy for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis: experience with 78 patients. Spine2001;26:E354–60.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00007632-200108150-00010&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11493864&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 

193.**Kim K-T**, Suk K-S, Cho Y-J, Hong G-P, Park B-J. Clinical outcome results of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with kyphotic deformity. Spine2002;27:612–18.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00007632-200203150-00010&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11884909&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000174473600008&link_type=ISI) 

194.**Niemeyer T**, Hackenberg L, Bullmann V, Liljenqvist U, Halm H. Technique and results of monosegmental transpedicular subtraction osteotomy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and fixed kyphotic deformity of the spine. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb2002;140:176–81.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1055/s-2002-31537&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12029590&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000175472600017&link_type=ISI) 

195.**Apple DF Jr**, Anson C. Spinal cord injury occurring in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a multicenter study. Orthopedics1995;18:1005–11.
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8584458&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995TA14400006&link_type=ISI) 

196.**Einsiedel T**, Kleimann M, Nothofer W, Neugebauer R. Special considerations in therapy of injuries of the cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis (Bechterew disease). Unfallchirurg2001;104:1129–33.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s001130170003&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11803718&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000173220400003&link_type=ISI) 

197.**Taggard DA**, Traynelis VC. Management of cervical spinal fractures in ankylosing spondylitis with posterior fixation. Spine2000;25:2035–9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00007632-200008150-00006&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10954633&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000088839400005&link_type=ISI) 

198.**Altman DG**, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, *et al.* The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med2001;134:663–94.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11304107&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000168177500006&link_type=ISI) 

199.**Begg C**, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, *et al.* Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA1996;276:637–9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8773637&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fannrheumdis%2F65%2F4%2F423.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://ard.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1996VC85300031&link_type=ISI)