rss
Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:115-117 doi:10.1136/ard.2005.038802
  • Concise report

Modification of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a quality improvement study

  1. M B Urowitz,
  2. D D Gladman,
  3. D Ibanez,
  4. Y Berliner
  1. Rheumatology Department, University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr M B Urowitz
    Rheumatology Department, University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada; m.urowitz{at}utoronto.ca
  • Accepted 19 June 2005

Abstract

Background: Hypercholesterolaemia and hypertension are risk factors for coronary artery disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Objective: To examine the recognition and management of hypercholesterolaemia and hypertension in patients with SLE before and after a quality improvement study.

Method: Patients with SLE have been followed up prospectively at the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic since 1970. The charts of all patients who entered the clinic since 1990 were reviewed to ensure completeness of data on anti-hypertensive treatment (AHT) and lipid lowering agents (LLA). Recognition and management of hypercholesterolaemia and hypertension were evaluated for the periods 1990–1995 and 1996–2001.

Results: Comparison of treatment between time periods showed that during 1990–1995 204/559 (36%) patients seen were hypertensive, of whom 180 (88%) were receiving AHT, and during 1996–2001 241/576 (42%) patients seen were hypertensive, of whom 232 (96%) were receiving AHT (p = 0.0013). A comparison of treatment for hypercholesterolaemia showed that 21/236 (9%) hypercholesterolaemic patients were being treated with LLA in the earlier period compared with 74/261 (28%) in the later period (p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Treatment for hypertension and hyperlipidaemia has increased in the past 6 years compared with the previous 6 years, but a number of patients eligible for these treatments remain untreated.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.