rss
Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:257-261 doi:10.1136/ard.2003.016519
  • Extended report

Relative responsiveness of condition specific and generic health status measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

  1. C Moretti1,
  2. S Viola2,
  3. A Pistorio3,
  4. S Magni-Manzoni1,
  5. N Ruperto2,
  6. A Martini2,
  7. A Ravelli2
  1. 1Dipartimento di Pediatria, Università di Pavia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy
  2. 2Dipartimento di Pediatria, Università di Genova, Divisione di Pediatria II, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico G. Gaslini, Genova, Italy
  3. 3Servizio di Epidemiologia Clinica e Biostatistica, Direzione Scientifica, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico G. Gaslini, Genova, Italy
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr A Ravelli
    Pediatria II, Istituto G. Gaslini, Largo G. Gaslini 5, 16147 Genova, Italy; angeloravelliospedale-gaslini.ge.it
  • Accepted 20 June 2004

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the relative responsiveness of condition specific measures with that of a generic health status instrument for outcome assessment of intra-articular corticosteroid (IAC) injection in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

Methods: We examined 44 consecutive patients with oligoarticular JIA before an IAC injection and after 6 months. Condition specific measures included physician’s and parent’s global assessments, the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ), the articular indices, and laboratory indicators of systemic inflammation. The generic health status instrument was the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), which was divided into two parts: the physical score (PhS) and the psychosocial score (PsS). Responsiveness statistics were the standardised response mean, the effect size, and Guyatt’s method. The discriminative ability of the clinical measures in distinguishing improved from non-improved patients was evaluated with the correlation and the receiver operating characteristic methods, using the physician’s and the parent’s judgements of the treatment outcome as external criteria.

Results: All responsiveness statistics and discriminative ability assessments consistently ranked the physician’s global assessment of the disease activity as the most responsive measure. The CHQ-PhS revealed superior ability in detecting baseline versus 6 month change compared with the CHAQ and the CHQ-PsS; both summary scales of the CHQ revealed better discriminative ability than the CHAQ.

Conclusions: The physician’s global assessment of the disease activity proved the most responsive outcome measure in our patients with JIA. The relative evaluative properties of the generic health status instrument and the CHAQ should be further investigated.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.