Article Text

PDF

Expression of interferon β in synovial tissue from patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with patients with osteoarthritis and reactive arthritis
  1. J van Holten,
  2. T J M Smeets,
  3. P Blankert,
  4. P P Tak
  1. Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Academic Medical Centre/University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr P P Tak
    Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology F4-218, Academic Medical Centre, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; P.P.Takamc.uva.nl

Abstract

Background: IFNβ may have immunomodulatory effects in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its increased production in RA synovium may be a reactive attempt to inhibit inflammation.

Objective: To determine the expression of IFNβ in the synovial tissue of patients with RA, osteoarthritis, and reactive arthritis.

Methods: Synovial biopsy specimens were obtained by arthroscopy from patients with RA and disease controls for immunohistological analysis using a monoclonal antibody specific for IFNβ. Bound antibody was detected by an immunoperoxidase method. Stained sections were evaluated by computer assisted image analysis. Double stainings were performed with antibodies to detect CD55 positive fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS), CD68 positive macrophages, and CD83 positive dendritic cells (DCs) coexpressing IFNβ.

Results: IFNβ protein was abundantly expressed in the synovium of patients with RA. Digital image analysis showed a significant increase in the mean integrated optical density for IFNβ expression in RA synovial tissue compared with disease controls. Specific up regulation of IFNβ expression was also seen when the results were controlled for cell numbers. Phenotypic analysis showed that FLS, especially, but also macrophages and DCs may express IFNβ in RA synovial tissue.

Conclusions: The increased expression of IFNβ in RA synovium suggests activation of an immunomodulatory mechanism that could inhibit synovial inflammation.

  • AP, alkaline phosphatase
  • BSA, bovine serum albumin
  • FLS, fibroblast-like synoviocytes
  • HRP, horseradish peroxidase
  • IFNβ, interferon β
  • OA, osteoarthritis
  • RA, rheumatoid arthritis
  • ReA, reactive arthritis
  • TBS, Tris buffered saline
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • interferon β
  • expression
  • synovial tissue
  • cytokines

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting synovial tissue in multiple joints. The rheumatoid synovium is characterised by infiltration of inflammatory cells like macrophages and fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS), which have a crucial role as effector cells in RA.

Interferon β (IFNβ) is emerging as a molecule with a possible beneficial effect on arthritis activity.1–3 Interferons are a family of naturally secreted proteins with immunomodulatory functions.4 IFNβ, a type I IFN, has mainly anti-inflammatory properties and can exert a variety of immunological effects.5,6 An additional reason why IFNβ might be of interest in RA, is its inhibitory effect on osteoclastogenesis. IFNβ has an important role in bone homoeostasis by inhibiting c-Fos induction required for osteoclastogenesis.7,8 Consistent with these studies, recent work has shown that daily subcutaneous treatment with IFNβ inhibits the development of erosive disease in an animal model of RA.9

So far, little is known about the endogenous production of IFNβ in the synovium of patients with RA. One report suggested high IFNβ expression in the synovial tissue of six patients with RA compared with patients with osteoarthritis (OA), but the sample size did not allow statistical analysis.10 In addition, double staining for phenotypic analysis was not performed. This motivated us to compare protein expression of IFNβ in the synovium of a larger number of patients with RA with its expression in synovial tissue from patients with OA and reactive arthritis (ReA) as disease controls. In addition, we performed phenotypic analysis to determine the expression of IFNβ by FLS, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs) in rheumatoid synovium.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients with RA underwent synovial biopsy of an inflamed knee joint. All patients with RA met the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for the diagnosis of RA.11 In addition, synovial biopsy specimens were obtained from nine patients with inflammatory OA and six with ReA. Table 1 presents the clinical data of these patients. At the time of inclusion all patients with RA, OA, and ReA were treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, two patients with RA received disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, and one patient with RA was treated with corticosteroids. None of the patients with OA and ReA were treated with DMARDs or corticosteroids. All patients gave written informed consent and the study protocol was approved by the medical ethics committee.

Table 1

 Clinical data of patients with RA,OA, and ReA who were studied for the expression of IFNβ in synovial tissue

Specimen collection

Biopsy specimens were taken from the knee under local anaesthesia using arthroscopy. Arthroscopies, tissue sampling, and storage were performed as described previously.12

Immunohistochemical analysis

Sections were stained with a monoclonal antibody against IFNβ (PBL, Florence, Italy). Staining was performed according to a three step immunoperoxidase method, as previously described.13

Digital image analysis

The slides were evaluated by digital image analysis. All sections were coded and analysed in a random order by an independent observer who was unaware of the clinical data as described previously.14

Double staining

To investigate the percentages of FLS, macrophages, and DCs that express IFNβ in RA synovium, we performed double staining using light microscopy with the following monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD68 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), anti-CD55 FITC (Central Laboratory of the Netherlands Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), anti-CD83 FITC (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA), and IFNβ (PBL).

Frozen sections were incubated with IFNβ (IgG1) in Tris buffered saline (TBS)/bovine serum albumin (BSA) 1% overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, sections were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated goat-antimouse in TBS/BSA 1% for 30 minutes at room temperature. Before applying biotin-tyramide for 15 minutes and streptavidin-HRP for 30 minutes, sections were incubated with 10% normal mouse serum for 15 minutes. HRP activity was detected using AEC as dye. Thereafter, anti-CD68 (IgG3) diluted in TBS/BSA 1%, was applied for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark and, subsequently, goat-antimouse IgG3-alkaline phosphatase (AP) was applied for 30 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Fast blue staining (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was used to develop the AP signal.

For detection of CD55 and CD83, anti-CD55-FITC and anti-CD83-FITC, respectively, were used, followed by rabbit anti-FITC (DAKO) and swine-antirabbit-AP (DAKO). Fast blue staining (Vector Laboratories) was used to develop the AP signal. For control sections, the primary antibodies were omitted, or irrelevant isotype matched mouse antibodies were applied.

Coexpression of CD68, CD55, and CD83 positive cells with IFNβ in the synovium of six patients with RA was determined by counting positive cells. The results were noted as follows: 0–5%, 6–25%, 26–50%, 51–75%, or 76–100% double staining cells. All sections were analysed in a blinded manner by two independent observers.

Statistical analysis

The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare scores (expressed in integrated optical density/mm2 for image analysis) of IFNβ between all (RA, OA, and ReA) diagnostic groups. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between two groups.

RESULTS

Clinical features

Table 1 shows the clinical features and demographic characteristics of the patients. The mean age of patients with ReA was lower than that of patients with RA and inflammatory OA (p = 0.003). Patients from the RA and ReA group had, on average, a shorter disease duration than patients in the OA group.

Increased IFNβ protein expression in rheumatoid synovial tissue

All negative controls had no positive staining. Staining for IFNβ was found in all compartments of the synovium, but especially in the intimal lining layer. Examination of stained sections by digital image analysis using a standardised program showed a significant increase in the mean (SEM) integrated optical density14 for IFNβ expression in RA synovial tissue compared with controls (RA 1900 (514) v OA 447 (171), and v ReA 358 (195), p = 0.04). To exclude the possibility that this difference might be explained by differences in synovial cell infiltration between RA and disease controls, we also determined IFNβ expression (mean (SEM)) after correcting for cell numbers (RA 33 (13.2) v OA 7 (4.8), and v ReA 3 (1.8), p = 0.02) (fig 1).

Figure 1

 IFNβ expression in synovium from 17 patients with RA, nine with inflammatory OA, and six with ReA, detected by immunohistochemistry and evaluated by digital image analysis.

Expression of IFNβ by FLS, macrophages, and DCs

To examine which cell types may express IFNβ in rheumatoid synovium, we performed double label experiments. Staining for IFNβ was particularly found in FLS, and to a lesser extent in macrophages and DCs (fig 2). In RA synovium about 76–100% of the FLS, 6–25% of the macrophages, and 26–50% of the DCs were IFNβ positive.

Figure 2

 Double staining of RA synovial tissue with (A) CD83 positive dendritic cells (blue) and IFNβ (red); (B) CD68 positive macrophages (blue) and IFNβ (red); and (C) CD55 positive fibroblasts like synoviocytes (blue) and IFNβ (red). Yellow arrows point to examples of double staining cells, black arrows point to examples of IFNβ positive cells (original magnification ×400).

DISCUSSION

In this study the expression of IFNβ was determined in synovial tissue from patients with RA, inflammatory OA, and ReA. Digital image analysis of stained tissue sections showed a marked increase in IFNβ protein expression in rheumatoid synovial tissue compared with disease controls. The increased expression of IFNβ could not be explained by increased cellularity in RA, because after correction for cell numbers the differences remained significant.

Phenotypic analysis showed that FLS, especially, but also macrophages and DCs, in rheumatoid synovium may express IFNβ. The effector phase in RA is thought to be mediated, in part, by activation of FLS and macrophages, which produce a variety of proinflammatory cytokines. Mature DCs may present antigens to memory T cells and in turn activate T cells, leading to activation of FLS and macrophages.

In light of the anti-inflammatory properties of IFNβ1,2 we suggest that the increased expression of this cytokine by FLS and macrophages in rheumatoid synovial tissue may represent a reactive anti-inflammatory mechanism. Apparently, this anti-inflammatory response is insufficient to inhibit RA activity completely.

Because FLS, macrophages, and DCs have such important roles in the initiation and persistence of inflammation, IFNβ might theoretically also promote inflammation. Moreover, a previous report suggested that IFNβ might be capable of protecting T cells from undergoing apoptosis and that, in consequence, the presence of IFNβ in RA synovium might lead to the maintenance of chronic inflammation.10 However, we and others have shown that daily IFNβ treatment in collagen induced arthritis in both mice and rhesus monkeys suppresses synovial inflammation.2,3,9 In these animal experiments we did not see an increase in T cell numbers, and any potential anti-apoptotic effect did not prevent a beneficial therapeutic effect of IFNβ in vivo. Taken together, the available data suggest that the net effect of IFNβ in arthritis is anti-inflammatory. The recent observation that IFNβ may inhibit osteoclastogenesis indicates that the effects of IFNβ in RA might also affect the level of joint destruction.8

The results presented here show that IFNβ is expressed in various forms of arthritis with a specific increase in protein expression in RA. Considering the previously demonstrated beneficial effects of IFNβ on synovial inflammation and bone homoeostasis in vitro and in vivo, we propose that the markedly increased expression of IFNβ in RA synovium represents activation of a partially incomplete anti-inflammatory response that might reduce synovial inflammation and, perhaps more importantly, might inhibit bone destruction.

REFERENCES

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 5 May 2005

  • Competing interests: Dr Tak has received support from Serono for a clinical study investigating the role of interferon β in patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Dr van Holten has received a research grant from the Serono Pharmaceutical Research Institute.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.