rss
Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:957-963 doi:10.1136/ard.62.10.957
  • Extended report

Detection of cases of inflammatory rheumatic disorders: performance of a telephone questionnaire designed for use by patient interviewers

  1. F Guillemin1,
  2. A Saraux2,
  3. P Fardellone3,
  4. P Guggenbuhl4,
  5. J-M Behier5,
  6. J Coste6,
  7. for the epidemiology committee of the French Society of Rheumatology
  1. 1EA 3444, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, University Hospital, Nancy, France
  2. 2Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Brest, France
  3. 3Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Amiens, France
  4. 4Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Rennes, France
  5. 5Pharmacia, Paris, France
  6. 6Department of Biostatistics, Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor F Guillemin, Ecole de Santé Publique Faculté de Medécine, BP 184, Nancy, France;
    francis.guillemin{at}sante-pub.u-nancy.fr
  • Accepted 3 March 2003

Abstract

Objective: To assess the performance in the detection of cases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the spondyloarthropathies (SpA) of a questionnaire suitable for use in telephone surveys conducted by patient interviewers.

Methods: A questionnaire was designed with reference to the signs, symptoms, and epidemiological criteria for RA (ACR 1987) and SpA (ESSG 1991). Three groups of respondents were recruited from the rheumatology outpatient clinics of 10 university hospitals: 235 with RA, 175 with SpA, and 195 controls with other rheumatological disorders. All diagnoses were confirmed by a rheumatologist. Patient from self help groups and social organisations were trained by a polling company professional to conduct a standard telephone interview using the new questionnaire.

Results: In an RA-control comparison, logistic regression showed that a set of five items, predominantly ACR criteria, were the most informative. Self reported diagnosis performed best (sensitivity 0.99, specificity 0.87). In an SpA-control comparison, a set of three items from the ESSG criteria were the most informative, with self reported diagnosis again performing best (sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.96). Overall agreements with clinical diagnoses were 97.7% for RA and 94.4% SpA, dropping to 90.4% and 79.1%, respectively, when self reported diagnosis was excluded. Without self reported diagnosis, questions about peripheral joint and spinal pain made significant contributions to diagnostic performance.

Conclusion: A questionnaire in plain language was developed for use in detecting cases of RA and SpA. It performed satisfactorily when administered by patient interviewers and is now available for epidemiological surveys of the general population.

Footnotes

  • Clinical investigators: Alain Cantagrel (University Hospital, Toulouse), Isabelle Chary-Valckenaere (University Hospital, Nancy), Liana Euller-Ziegler, (University Hospital, Nice), Patrice Fardellone (University Hospital, Amiens), René-Marc Flipo (University Hospital, Lille), Pascal Guggenbuhl (University Hospital, Rennes), Robert Juvin (University Hospital, Grenoble), Jacques Sany (University Hospital, Montpellier), Alain Saraux (University Hospital, Brest), Thierry Schaeverbecke, (University Hospital, Bordeaux), France.

  • Epidemiology committee of the French Society of Rheumatology: Joel Coste, Patrice Fardellone, Bruno Fautrel, Pascal Guggenbuhl, Francis Guillemin, Charles Masson, Alain Saraux.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.