Article Text

PDF

Chronic widespread pain in the population: a seven year follow up study
  1. A C Papageorgiou1,
  2. A J Silman1,
  3. G J Macfarlane1,2
  1. 1Arthritis Research Campaign Epidemiology Unit, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, The Medical School, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
  2. 2The Unit of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, The Medical School, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor Gary J Macfarlane, The Unit of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, The Medical School, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK;
    G.Macfarlane{at}man.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives: To document the natural course of chronic widespread pain (CWP) in a general population sample over a seven year period and to identify comorbidities which predict persistence.

Methods: A mailed survey questionnaire returned by 2334 adults registered with two general practices was used to obtain information on pain status (no pain, regional pain, or CWP) and other health and pain symptoms. Seven years later a second questionnaire was sent to responders who were still registered with the same general practice, asking about their current pain status.

Results: Information was obtained for 1386 adults (an adjusted response of 93%). The prevalence of CWP was similar for both surveys at 11% and 10% respectively. Of those with CWP initially, a third recorded CWP on the second survey and 15% were pain free. Only 2% of subjects with no initial pain had developed CWP at follow up. Of subjects with CWP on the initial survey who were aged over 50 years and reported dry eyes or mouth and daytime tiredness, 77% reported CWP seven years later. This contrasts with a persistence of only 9% for those aged under 50 and with neither symptom recorded at initial survey.

Conclusion: The proportion of subjects from a general population sample changing from CWP to no pain, or vice versa, over a seven year period was very low. This suggests that pain, once established, is likely to persist (or recur) especially if accompanied by other somatic symptoms and older age.

  • chronic widespread pain
  • prospective study
  • somatic symptoms
  • outcome predictors
  • CI, confidence interval
  • CWP, chronic widespread pain
  • OR, odds ratio

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Cross sectional studies indicate that, at any time, about one in every 10 adults will experience chronic widespread pain (CWP). This is higher in women than in men and generally increases with age.1,2 No clear correlation between CWP and tenderness has been found in these community studies, which have concluded that “fibromyalgia” was the extreme end of a continuum of pain rather than a distinct entity,2,3 a view reinforced by more recent research.4 Several subsequent studies have shown that CWP is associated with depression or other symptoms of psychological distress1,5,6 and with a constellation of other health symptoms.7 It has been proposed that this combination of symptoms could indicate that CWP forms one symptom of a more general process of somatisation.8 Although cross sectional studies can show an association between different symptoms, they are unable to disentangle the temporal relationship between health symptoms (such as psychological distress and somatisation) and CWP. To do so requires a prospective study based in the general population.

In the past few years several population studies have reported on the course of chronic pain over time and factors associated with both the development and persistence of CWP. McBeth et al found that 56% of subjects with CWP still reported symptoms after one year,9 whereas Macfarlane et al reported persistence at two years of 35%.6 Using an identical definition of CWP and examining a large general population sample the present study aimed to contribute further evidence by (a) documenting the natural course of chronic widespread pain over a longer period (seven years); (b) identifying comorbidities at the initial survey which predict poor long term outcome in those with CWP

METHODS

In 1991 a survey questionnaire was sent to 2034 people registered with a large general practice in rural Cheshire. Adults aged between 20 and 85 years were randomly selected from within age and sex stratified groups, with a higher proportion selected for inclusion from the younger age groups. The next year the same questionnaire was mailed to a further 2161 adults similarly selected from the register of a second Cheshire practice in a more urban setting.

The seven page survey questionnaire requested demographic details and included eight questions about musculoskeletal aches and pains in the past month (see appendix A). A further 10 questions on other health symptoms were selected from the Fatigue Questionnaire,10 the Somatic Symptoms Checklist,11 and the General Health Questionnaire (see appendix B).12,13 Current pain status was established by asking if, during the past month, the person had experienced an ache or pain which had lasted for one day or longer. Those responding positively were asked whether or not the pain had been present for more than three months, and directed to shade in the site of the ache or pain on a blank body manikin. Further questions asked if the pain was still present and whether their general practitioner had been consulted because of the pain.

The survey questionnaire was returned by 2334 subjects, a response rate of 75% after adjustment for persons not living at the registered address. Information from the shaded manikin on the sites and spread of pain, and from the question on pain duration permitted responders with CWP (defined according to the definition of the American College of Rheumatology used in the criteria for fibromyalgia) to be identified. Subjects with pain who did not meet the definition of CWP were classified as having regional pain. A subset of 141 subjects had been studied previously to determine outcome at two years.6

In 1997 attempts were made to identify on the practice lists 2105 subjects, born in or after 1916, who had responded to the initial 1991–2 survey questionnaires. It was decided not to include the 229 subjects born before 1916 as they might have problems completing the questionnaire. A total of 1588 (75%) subjects who responded to the original survey were identified as still registered with the same practice and these comprised the follow up cohort. Of the remaining 517 subjects, 120 were identified by the Office for National Statistics as having died during the follow up period. Over an 18 month period from early 1998 the 1588 subjects identified were sent a further survey questionnaire. As with the original 1991–2 survey, this included a blank manikin and identical questions on the site and duration of pain; the pain and health symptom questions (detailed in the appendices) were not included. Non-responders were sent a postcard reminder and then a further questionnaire. Those still not responding were sent a shortened version of the questionnaire and, if necessary, contacted by telephone. The addresses of subjects for whom a response was still not received were then checked against the electoral register to identify those who were no longer living at the address registered with the general practice.

Analysis

The categories of pain at the two periods were compared using simple cross tabulations. Prognostic factors for subjects with CWP in 1991–2 were identified using logistic regression and expressed as odd ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) adjusted for age and sex. The outcome variable was whether or not CWP was indicated on the 1998 follow up survey questionnaire.

All variables identified as having a significant OR by univariate analysis were presented as candidates for entry into a forward stepwise logistic regression model to identify a small group of independent factors predicting outcome at seven years.

RESULTS

Response rates and loss to follow up

Of the 1588 subjects mailed at follow up, 1386 questionnaires (87%) were returned after up to three reminders. When the addresses of the 202 non-responders were checked against the electoral register, almost half (97) were found not to live at their listed address, making an adjusted response rate of 93%.

The natural course of CWP over seven years

Table 1 shows the changes in pain status over the seven year follow up period. A third (59) of the 173 adults with CWP in 1991 still met the criteria seven years later, 51% had “other pain”, and only 15% were free of pain. By comparison 2% and 10% of subjects with no pain and “other pain” at baseline had developed CWP after seven years, respectively. Similar results were found when data for men and women were examined separately.

Table 1

Changes in pain status between 1991 and 1998

Predictors of long term outcome of CWP

To examine factors which might predict the persistence of CWP, only the 173 subjects reporting CWP on the original survey are considered. Sex did not influence the seven year outcome, with men and women equally likely to report persistent pain. However, subjects over 50 years of age were three times more likely to have persistent symptoms than subjects younger than 50 years (table 2).

Table 2

In those with CWP in 1991, the risk for this being reported at follow up

Of the eight pain statements (detailed in appendix A), subjects who reported “I ache all over” or “pain keeps me awake at night” were twice as likely to experience persistent CWP as those not thus affected in 1991–2. Of the 10 health symptoms (listed in appendix B) only being “too tired during the day” and having “dry eyes or dry mouth” were significant risks for persistent pain (table 2). The three General Health Questionnaire questions, either individually or in combination, were not significantly associated with persistent pain.

Forward stepwise logistic regression modelling identified three factors which explained the persistence of CWP: “feeling too tired during the day to do what you want to do”, aged over 50 years, and experiencing dry eyes or mouth (table 3). Of the 44 subjects with CWP at baseline who reported none of these factors, only four (9%) still had CWP seven years later. However, 10 out of 13 (77%) of subjects with CWP at baseline and responding positively to all three factors on the original survey questionnaire reported CWP on the follow up survey.

Table 3

In those with CWP in 1991, the forward stepwise logistic regression model identified three factors* predicting persistent CWP

DISCUSSION

Subjects with CWP who were over 50 years of age and reported somatic symptoms and daytime tiredness were most likely to report CWP seven years later. Even if pain was present in the three months before the two occasions when the survey questionnaire was completed it cannot be assumed to have been present throughout the seven intervening years nor, inversely, absent in subjects free of pain on both occasions. However, the relatively few cases moving between the CWP group and the pain free group suggests that some subjects generally experienced more pain ( CWP or regional pain) whereas others had less pain (no pain or regional pain) during this period. Further, the ability to predict the persistence of CWP does suggest that these subjects' experience was distinct during the follow up period.

Only a limited number of health symptom questions were asked in the initial survey questionnaire. Although the rationale of abstracting three questions from the General Health Questionnaire could be argued, the decision to do so was based on a report that showed the three included questions to be good predictors of potential depression in the community.13 The remaining health symptoms were those found to be associated with fibromyalgia in studies undertaken before the initial 1990 survey —for example, those of Campbell et al.14 However, it has been argued that, given the range of personal experiences and characteristics, and the social, economic, and cultural factors that influence pain perception, any study hoping to shed light on the causes or persistence of CWP should investigate all these areas for potential risk factors.15,16 Subsequent community studies examining predictors of onset and persistence of fibromyalgia have shown the importance of factors such as illness behaviour, and (with more thorough evaluation than was available in this study) psychological distress, somatic symptoms, and fatigue.8,9 Measurement of these factors is likely to have improved predictive ability in the current study.

The response rate to the initial survey was 75%. Information obtained on non-responders did not differ substantially from that of subjects responding to the survey.1 The study has several strengths. As over 5% of the population is estimated to change their general practitioner each year,17 the high proportion (75%) of the original survey participants included in the follow up study would suggest a fairly static study population. Almost a quarter of the subjects who were not identified for follow up had died in the seven years since the initial survey. The remaining subjects (presumed to have moved from the area) were similar to those included in the follow up cohort in terms of pain status, although younger women were overrepresented (data not shown). As the adjusted response to the follow up survey was high (93%), it is unlikely that any significant non-response bias had occurred, particularly in relation to predictors of outcome.

The prevalence rates found in the current study are similar to those reported for other population surveys of CWP.2,9,18,19 The prevalence of CWP was similar in both the initial1 and follow up surveys (at 11% and 10% respectively), although these figures disguise the fact that almost half of the subjects (44%) had changed pain status over the seven year period. Although a few other studies have examined factors which predict CWP over seven or more years,20,21 only one has reported specifically on the change in pain status over a similar period. In a study of pain in women Forseth et al4 documented an increase in CWP from 27% to 38% over five years due to regional and multifocal pain developing into CWP. We have previously proposed a more stringent definition (Manchester definition) for chronic widespread pain22 with a correspondingly lower prevalence (about 4%) in the community.23 In the current study, however, those meeting the Manchester criteria at baseline were no more likely to report CWP on follow up than those with CWP who did not meet the Manchester definition (data not shown).

In the current study, older age and two items from the “health symptoms” list (concerning dry eyes/mouth and day time tiredness) were independently associated with persistent CWP. Older age has been previously identified as a risk for persistent pain over a shorter time period,9 but not over a comparable follow up period.21 Although the recording of dry eyes and dry mouth may suggest Sjögren's syndrome, a previous study has shown that their report was not related to other features of Sjögren's syndrome.24 The large differences in outcome depending on age and the presence of these two comorbidities does offer primary care physicians a few simple items that can distinguish groups at very different risks of persistent symptoms, with the prospect of targeting early management at those at high risk of persistence.

Considering the current study together with our two previous reports on the persistence of CWP6,9 these show a persistence of CWP of 56% at one year, 35% at two years, and 34% at seven years. Although, of course, persons with persistent pain may not be the same at each time point, the results suggest that, at worst, one third of patients will have persistent (although not necessarily continuous) pain in the long term. This can be predicted by older age and the presence of other somatic symptoms. In comparison with clinic based studies (where patients are likely to have more severe symptoms) the persistence rate is somewhat lower but still suggests an important long term burden.

APPENDIX A: PAIN STATEMENTS

Here are some statements about pain. Please think back over the past month and tick one box for every statement. Tick the YES box for any which closely fit your experiences during the past month. Tick the NO box for those which do not apply.

I ache all over

Pain wakes me during the night

I have pain in my muscles

I ache when I wake up in the morning

I have pain in my neck and shoulders

I feel stiff when I get out of bed in the morning

I have pain in my back

I have pain in my joints

APPENDIX B: OTHER HEALTH SYMPTOMS

Here are some questions about other health matters. Please tick one box for every questions, choosing the one which most closely fits your recent experience. We would like to know how you have been feeling during the past month.

Do you ever wake up after your usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out?*

Do you feel too tired during the day to do what you want to do?*

Do your joints ever feel swollen?†

Do your arms or legs ever feel numb?†

Do you suffer from constipation or diarrhoea?†

Do your eyes or mouth feel dry?†

Do your fingers become white and painful in the cold weather?†

Have you recently lost much sleep over worry?‡

Have you recently felt you couldn't overcome your difficulties?‡

Have you recently been feeling unhappy or depressed?‡

Responses were on a four point Likert scale.*questions from the Fatigue Questionnaire 10; †questions from the Somatic Symptoms Checklist11; ‡questions from the General Health Questionnaire12

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Arthritis Research Campaign (ARC), Chesterfield, UK. We thank the doctors and staff at Bollington Medical Centre and Wilmslow Road Surgery, Handforth, for their help with this study. We are grateful for the assistance of staff at National Statistics, Southport. Thanks also go to Rita Boswell and other staff at the ARC, past and present, who assisted with the conduct of the original studies.

REFERENCES

View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.