Anti-Ro52 reactivity is an independent and additional serum marker in connective tissue disease
- 1Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Gent, Belgium
- 2Innogenetics, Gent, Belgium
- 3Centre Hospitalier Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Correspondence to:
Dr I Peene, Department of Rheumatology 0K12IB, University Hospital Gent, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium;
- Accepted 10 April 2002
Objective: To determine whether anti-Ro52 is an independent serum marker in connective tissue disease.
Methods: Over a two year period, 1727 consecutive antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive serum samples were analysed in parallel by double immunodiffusion with thymus/spleen nuclear extract and by line immunoassay with recombinant Ro52, recombinant La/SSB, and natural Ro60. Sera that were only reactive towards Ro52 were further analysed by a variety of additional anti-SSA/Ro detection methods and by specific anti-Ro52 and anti-Ro60 assays. Natural purified SSA/Ro was analysed by immunoblot and protein sequencing.
Results: Analysis of natural purified SSA/Ro (Immunovision, Springdale, AR) showed only Ro60 and no immunoreactive Ro52. Consequently, assays based on this substrate only identify sera with anti-Ro60 reactivity. Twenty serum samples showed anti-Ro52 without anti-Ro60 and anti-SSB/La on line immunoassay. By additional testing, 2/20 sera were found positive for anti-Ro60 reactivity. The remaining 18 sera were not identified by any of the classical anti-SSA/Ro assays and were considered to be reactive only with Ro52 and not with Ro60. This anti-Ro52 reactivity was confirmed by natural and recombinant Ro52 in 16/18 cases. 12/18 sera corresponded to connective tissue diseases.
Conclusion: Anti-Ro52 positive sera without any evidence of anti-Ro60 and anti-La/SSB reactivity can be considered as an independent group that is systematically missed by classical anti-SSA/Ro detection methods owing to a bias towards anti-Ro60 reactivity. The anti-Ro52 sera are precipitin negative, not retrieved by SSA/Ro enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) based on natural SSA/Ro, and show no specific ANA fluorescence staining pattern. These findings together with the clinical data indicate that anti-Ro52 should be considered as an additional and independent serum marker.
- ANA, antinuclear antibodies
- DID, double immunodiffusion
- ELISA, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
- HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography
- mAb, monoclonal antibody
- PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
- PBS, phosphate buffered saline
- SDS, sodium dodecyl sulphate