rss
Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:799-801 doi:10.1136/ard.60.8.799
  • Concise report

Value of clinical factors in selecting postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis for bone densitometry

  1. J M Nolla,
  2. J Fiter,
  3. C Gómez-Vaquero,
  4. J J Alegre,
  5. J Valverde,
  6. D Roig-Escofet
  1. Rheumatology Department, Ciutat Sanitària i Universitària de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
  1. Dr J M Nolla, Rheumatology Department (Pl 10–2), Ciutat Sanitària i Universitària de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 L'Hospitalet (Barcelona), Spain28634apj{at}comb.es
  • Accepted 4 January 2001

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Criteria to decide which patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should be examined by dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) are currently not available. The rheumatologists from Amsterdam have proposed preliminary criteria based on clinical risk factors (age, disease activity, and functional status). These criteria are preliminary and not widely accepted but might be helpful in practice. The value of the proposal in a group of Spanish postmenopausal women with RA is analysed.

METHODS DXA (lumbar spine and femoral neck) was performed in 128 patients recruited from a clinical setting, and the proposed criteria were applied. T and Z scores were established for a Spanish reference population.

RESULTS The mean (SD) age of the patients was 61.3 (10.7) and mean duration of the postmenopausal period 14.5 (10.1) years. Mean duration of RA was 13.7 (7.7) years. Mean C reactive protein was 22 (21) mg/l; mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate 26 (18) mm/1st h; and mean Health Assessment Questionnaire score 1.25 (0.79). Ninety (70%) patients fulfilled the proposed criteria. Their sensitivity for the diagnosis of osteoporosis (T score ≤−2.5 SD) was 86% and their specificity, 43%. Positive predictive value was 54% and negative predictive value, 79%.

CONCLUSIONS The proposed criteria seem a good screening method for the selection of those patients with RA whose bone mineral density should be assessed as the sensitivity and negative predictive value are acceptable.

Footnotes

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.