rss
Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:349-352 doi:10.1136/ard.60.4.349
  • Extended report

Reporting of outcomes in arthritis trials measured on ordinal and interval scales is inadequate in relation to meta-analysis

  1. P C Gøtzsche
  1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, Department 7112, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
  1. Dr Gøtzschep.c.gotzsche{at}cochrane.dk
  • Accepted 12 September 2000

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To study whether the reporting of clinical outcomes in arthritis trials measured on ordinal and interval scales is adequate in relation to meta-analysis.

METHODS Systematic review of randomised trials of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Optimal reporting was defined as data in the original ordered categories for global evaluation and pain, and as mean and SD for number of tender joints and grip strength, and if a visual analogue scale had been used to measure pain.

RESULTS A total of 144 trials were included. The median sample size was 60 patients. The quality of the reporting increased over time for three of the four variables. Global evaluation was optimally reported in 52 of the 127 trials (41%) in which it was recorded. Pain was optimally reported in 27 of 98 trials (28%), number of tender joints in 41 of 123 trials (33%), and grip strength in 34 of 124 trials (27%). Even if rather broad criteria are adopted, only about half of the data were reported in a potentially useful way for a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS Arthritis trials have been reported inadequately in relation to meta-analysis. As most trials are underpowered, meta-analysis is indispensable and the deficit therefore needs urgent improvement. Investigators should specify a priori what constitutes an important treatment effect and report numbers of patients improved.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.