OBJECTIVES This prospective study was designed to clarify the frequency, causes, and clinical course of renal disease in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS 235 patients (185 women, mean age 49.4 years) with early RA of less than one year's duration were enrolled and assessed monthly. Proteinuria was defined as a positive dipstick result and microscopic haematuria was defined as the presence of ⩾5 red blood cells per high power field. Urinary abnormalities lasting three months or longer were defined as persistent abnormalities.
RESULTS At entry, 40 patients exhibited haematuria, two had a raised serum creatinine concentration, and none had proteinuria. During the observation period (average 42 months), persistent haematuria was found in 43, persistent proteinuria in 17, and a raised serum creatinine concentration in 14 patients. Persistent proteinuria was caused by drugs in 14 of 17 patients and disappeared in most cases. Risk factors for drug induced proteinuria included a raised C reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate and age over 50 at entry. Drugs resulted in a raised serum creatinine concentration in eight of 14 patients. The incidence of haematuria at entry did not differ among patients who had been treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, or no drugs. In some patients with isolated haematuria, the haematuria appeared when the activity of RA was high and resolved when it was low.
CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that a raised serum creatinine concentration or persistent proteinuria in patients with early RA is predominantly drug related whereas, in contrast, isolated haematuria is more directly associated with the activity of the disease process.
- rheumatoid arthritis
- renal disease
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Previous reports have indicated that the incidence of renal disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is considerable.1-3 Indeed, clinical signs suggesting renal disease are often seen in patients with RA.3-5 In such patients, renal abnormalities could be caused by drugs used for treatment, AA amyloidosis, rheumatoid vasculitis, other complicating diseases, and RA itself.1 6 In fact, renal disease was reported to occur more commonly in RA than in other collagen diseases, with the exception of systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitis.1 Indeed, end stage renal failure was a common cause of death of patients with RA until dialysis became readily available.7 8 Renal disease in RA, however, has not received much study.3
The prognosis of patients with RA showing renal disease varies greatly. For instance, proteinuria induced by gold or sulphydryl compounds is thought to disappear without leaving any sequela after the drugs are stopped.9 10 Patients with haematuria associated with the pathological finding of mesangial glomerulonephritis were also shown to have a favourable prognosis.11 12 In contrast, the prognosis of patients with AA amyloidosis or rapidly progressive crescentic glomerulonephritis is poor.7 13 Thus it is important to determine accurately the nature of the renal lesion in the kidneys of patients with abnormal renal findings.
In patients with advanced RA the cause of renal damage is often difficult to define because of the coexistence of multiple possible causes. Boers et al found pathological findings, including benign nephrosclerosis (90%), tubulointerstitial change (41%), glomerular change (43%), renal amyloidosis (11%), and renal vasculitis (6%) in necropsy specimens from patients with RA among whom the percentage of patients with clinically recognised renal damage before death was 52%.1 Thus heterogeneous renal lesions may complicate advanced RA even if they are not clinically apparent.
In the early stage of RA, however, renal lesions such as amyloidosis, vasculitis, and chronic interstitial change induced by drugs are rare. Therefore, data from patients with early RA are more suitable for the analysis of the incidence of drug induced renal damage and haematuria caused by mesangial glomerulonephritis. In this paper we describe the results of a prospective cohort study that was undertaken to determine the incidence of renal disorders in patients with early RA and to clarify its cause and outcome.
Patients and methods
Two hundred and thirty five patients with RA who attended the outpatient clinic of the Institute of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, between 1991 and 1997 within one year from the onset of RA, were enrolled. On enrolment, a careful drug history was obtained. Thereafter, they were examined monthly by rheumatologists and blood samples were withdrawn for blood cell count, blood chemistry, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C reactive protein (CRP) measurement. Patients who dropped out within six months of enrolment were excluded from the analysis. One hundred patients with non-systemic diseases like osteoarthritis, lumbago, and traumatic joints, with observation periods of more than three years, were selected as an age and sex matched control group and their records were reviewed for evaluation of renal disease.
LABORATORY EVALUATION OF RENAL DISEASE
Proteinuria was assessed by Ames dipstick test (Bayer-Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan) and 1+ or greater (albumin >250 mg/l) was interpreted as abnormal. Microscopic haematuria was screened by the dipstick test. A positive dipstick test was followed by microscopic examination of the urine sediment, with haematuria being defined as the presence of ⩾5 red blood cells per high power field. Urinary abnormalities were defined as intermittent when they lasted for less than three months but appeared repeatedly and were defined as persistent when they lasted for three months or more. Urinary abnormalities of less than three months' duration were excluded from the evaluation. Urine samples were not collected during or just after menstruation. A raised serum creatinine concentration (RCr) was defined as a serum creatinine concentration (Cr) exceeding the upper limit of the normal range (>115 μmol/l (1.3 mg/dl) for men and >97 μmol/l (1.1 mg/dl) for women) or when the Cr increased by ⩾26 μmol/l (0.3 mg/dl) over the value recorded at entry. All patients with isolated haematuria underwent either intravenous urography or abdominal ultrasonography to exclude anatomical disorders of the genitourinary tract. Drug induced renal damage was defined as renal damage that developed after the drug was started and which disappeared when the drug was stopped.
The data obtained were analysed by χ2 test, Fisher's exact probability test, two tailed Student'st test, Wilcoxon's test, and the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. p Values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
BASELINE CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PATIENTS
At entry, 235 patients fulfilled the criteria of classical, definite, or probable RA according to the 1958 classification criteria established by the American Rheumatism Association.14 At the end of the study, however, all the patients fulfilled the 1987 criteria for the classification of RA.15 Table 1summarises the baseline clinical characteristics of the patients. The average interval between the onset of RA and enrolment was 5.2 months (range 1–12).
OCCURRENCE OF RENAL DISEASE
The patients were followed up for six to 77 months (mean 42 months). During the observation period non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were given to 100% and 95.2% of the patients respectively. Table 2 shows the percentages of patients with renal abnormalities at entry and during the follow up period. No episodes of macroscopic haematuria were recorded. The percentage of patients with proteinuria, haematuria and/or RCr, increased during the course of the study (table 2). Haematuria was intermittent in 56/99 (57%) patients, whereas proteinuria was persistent in 17/23 (74%) cases (table 2). These renal abnormalities in patients with early RA were significantly more common than in the control group.
CAUSE OF PROTEINURIA
Drugs were the cause of persistent proteinuria (PP) in most patients, whereas the causes of intermittent proteinuria were less clear (table 3).
OCCURRENCE AND OUTCOME OF DRUG INDUCED PP
The total number of times each drug was used was recorded and compared with the number of episodes of the drug induced PP for each drug. As shown in table 4, the occurrence was the highest ford-penicillamine followed by gold thiomalate and bucillamine, a sulphydryl compound DMARD widely used in Japan.16 Auranofin and sulfasalazine induced PP occurred less frequently, whereas methotrexate did not cause PP in any of the patients. Among the NSAIDs, only sodium diclofenac caused PP in two patients.
PP appeared 2–39 months (mean 12.6, median 6) after the initiation of the drug. PP disappeared 1–24 months (mean 5.5, median 2.5) after the drug was stopped, except for two patients who were still using the drug at the last clinic visit or had stopped three months before the last visit. Proteinuria was associated with persistent haematuria in eight patients. In the two other patients treated withd-penicillamine, serum Cr was raised and a renal biopsy performed in one of the patients disclosed the presence of crescentic glomerulonephritis. This patient was treated aggressively with prednisolone, cyclophosphamide, and warfarin, which successfully reduced the level of Cr from 407 μmol/l (4.6 mg/dl) to 150 μmol/l (1.7 mg/dl). Except for these two cases the serum Cr did not increase in any of the patients with proteinuria induced by DMARDs.
On the other hand, the patient in whom PP was caused by sodium diclofenac twice showed a rise of Cr.
RISK FACTORS FOR DRUG INDUCED PP
Patients with and without PP were compared to identify the risk factors associated with drug induced PP. As indicated in table 5, the CRP and ESR at entry and the percentage of patients aged over 50 at entry were significantly higher in patients with PP than in those without PP. Patients with PP tended to show persistent haematuria (PH) more often than those without PP (table 5). Neither the percentage of patients with haematuria at entry nor the number of DMARDs used during the observation period differed significantly between the two groups.
CAUSES AND COURSE OF RAISED CREATININE
Table 6 shows the number of patients with RCr either at entry or during the observation period. At entry, only two patients had RCr. The causes of RCr were lobenzarit disodium,17 a DMARD used in Japan, and congenital renal hypoplasia. During the observation period, 12 patients had RCr and although a drug was considered to be the cause in nine of them, DMARD induced RCr was found in only two patients.
Table 7 compares the age and drug history of patients with and without haematuria at entry. Older people (⩾50) had a significantly higher incidence of haematuria. The incidence of haematuria at entry did not differ between patients who had been treated with NSAIDs or DMARDs, or both, before entry and those who had received no drug treatment. This suggested that neither the use of NSAIDs nor that of DMARDs increased the risk of haematuria. Similarly, NSAIDs and/or DMARDs used in the patients at the appearance of PH during the observation period were various, and no specific drugs were found to be definitively associated with PH (data not shown).
Because our data did not support the notion that drugs were related to haematuria, we then investigated whether the haematuria was associated with the activity of RA. Of 43 patients who exhibited PH during the study (table 2), those patients with PP (n=9) or RCr (n=3) were excluded because most PP and RCr was caused by drugs. In addition, one patient with a bladder tumour was excluded. Those who had PH at entry (n=11) were also excluded because the activity of their RA at the time of the first appearance of PH was unknown. The CRP of the remaining 19 patients at the time when isolated PH developed did not differ significantly from the CRP of patients without haematuria (n=136). Of these 19 patients, PH eventually resolved in 12 patients and lasted until their last visit in seven. We compared the CRP of the 19 patients at three points—at entry, at the time when PH developed, and when PH disappeared or at their last visit (table 8). Although no difference was evident between the CRP at entry and the CRP at the time when PH developed, there was a significant difference in 12 patients between the CRP at the time when PH developed and when PH disappeared. In contrast, the final CRP of the seven patients with lasting PH was not significantly different from the CRP at the point when PH developed. Lastly, the CRP of the 12 patients at the time of the disappearance of PH was significantly lower than the final CRP of the seven patients with lasting PH, suggesting that isolated haematuria was associated with the disease activity of RA.
The advantage of performing this kind of study in patients with early RA is that there is a low incidence of pre-existing renal damage or disease. Indeed, at entry into our study only two of the 235 patients enrolled had renal dysfunction and none of the patients exhibited proteinuria.
Drug induced proteinuria and renal dysfunction occurred in 1.7% and 1.5% of patients with early RA per year respectively. These values were lower than those reported in previous studies.18 19This difference may be secondary to the fact that the doses of DMARDs we used were lower than those used in previous studies. For example, our standard dose of d-penicillamine is 100–200 mg/day and that of gold thiomalate is 10–50 mg/month.
The outcome of patients with DMARD induced nephropathy was generally good, except for the two patients who had receivedd-penicillamine and developed crescentic glomerulonephritis. Similar cases have been reported previously.20 21 Because crescentic glomerulonephritis induced by d-penicillamine, unlike AA amyloidosis, responds to steroid treatment the distinction between the two conditions is clinically important. Moreover, in our studyd-penicillamine was associated with the highest occurrence of proteinuria followed by gold thiomalate and bucillamine. Therefore, from the viewpoint of renal toxicity, d-penicillamine is the DMARD that should be used with greatest care. No PP was seen in the patients who had taken methotrexate. Although the nephrotoxicity of sulfasalazine is unclear,22 the clinical course of our patient strongly suggested that this drug plays a part in the development of renal damage. Interestingly, in two patients the cause of proteinuria seemed to be sodium diclofenac, though NSAIDs are reported only rarely to cause proteinuria.23
In our study, haematuria was associated with drug induced PP more often than found in a previous report,24 though haematuria at entry was not found to be a risk factor for drug induced PP. Our data showed that a raised CRP and ESR at enrolment and age over 50 were risk factors for drug induced PP. The mechanism(s) by which more active inflammation render patients susceptible to the development of drug induced proteinuria remain(s) to be elucidated.
Although DMARDs were the responsible drugs in most cases of drug induced proteinuria, RCr was caused by a variety of drugs, including NSAIDs, diuretics, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. However, in patients with RCr caused by diuretics or dehydration during summer months, NSAIDs were likely to play a part in their renal dysfunction because acute renal failure may be induced by the use of NSAIDs in patients who rely upon prostaglandins to maintain their renal blood flow.25 26 It should be noted that renal dysfunction may actually occur more often than was found in this study because the value of Cr may underestimate renal function in patients with RA with the significant muscle atrophy that can be seen in these patients.27
There is controversy about the causes of haematuria seen in patients with RA. Thus some authors have indicated an association between haematuria and drugs,28 whereas others have not found such an association.29 30 Renal papillary necrosis induced by NSAIDs is unlikely to be a cause of haematuria in this study because no patient with haematuria exhibited gross haematuria or flank pain.31 Thin basement membrane disease has been reported to be related to gold thiomalate and to haematuria.32However, haematuria in our study showed no relation to any drugs. Korpela et al concluded that there was no difference in the prevalence of isolated haematuria between patients with RA and control subjects,12 which is in marked contrast with the reported findings of several other groups.28 30 32 Mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis can be caused by RA itself,33 34 and this is supported by our data because isolated haematuria improved when the disease activity of RA diminished, as indicated by a fall in CRP levels. It may be the case that cytokines, such as interleukin 6, which is known to be raised in RA,35 36 may induce the proliferation of mesangial cells as has been shown in animal models of renal disease.37 38 Of course, other factors apart from the activity of RA must play a part in the development of haematuria because many patients with higher CRP levels did not develop haematuria.
In conclusion, proteinuria, haematuria, and renal dysfunction are found in a high percentage of patients with early RA. Proteinuria in patients with early RA was mostly induced by DMARDs, whereas various drugs caused renal dysfunction. Most of these drug induced abnormalities disappeared when the offending drug was stopped. In contrast, isolated haematuria was not caused by drugs but seemed to be associated with the activity of RA in some patients.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.