rss
Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59:178-182 doi:10.1136/ard.59.3.178
  • Extended report

Sonography for hip joint effusion in adults with hip pain

  1. S M A Bierma-Zeinstraa,
  2. A M Bohnena,
  3. J A N Verhaarb,
  4. A Prinsa,
  5. A Z Ginai-Karamatc,
  6. J S Lamérisd
  1. aDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, bDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Erasmus University, cDepartment of Radiology, Erasmus University, dDepartment of Radiology, Amsterdam Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  1. Dr Bierma-Zeinstra, Department of General Practice, Erasmus University, Room Ff 320, Postbox 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands
  • Accepted 21 October 1999

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To study the prevalence of ultrasonic hip joint effusion and its relation with clinical, radiological and laboratory (ESR) findings in adults with hip pain.

METHODS Patients (n=224) aged 50 years or older with hip pain, referred by the general practitioner for radiological investigation, underwent a standardised examination. The distance between the ventral capsule and the femoral neck, an increase in which represents joint effusion, was measured sonographically. Joint effusion was defined in three different ways: “effusion” according to Koski's definition, “major effusion”, and “asymmetrical effusion” based on only individual side differences.

RESULTS “Effusion” was present in 80 (38%), “major effusion” in 20 (9%), and “asymmetrical effusion” in 47 (22%) patients. Pain in the groin or medial thigh, pain aggravated by lying on the side, decreased extension/internal rotation/abduction/flexion, painful external rotation, and pain on palpation in the groin showed a significant relation (adjusted for age and radiological osteoarthritis of the hip) with ultrasonic hip joint effusion. “Major effusion” showed a significant relation with an increased ESR. When patients with bilateral pain and increased ESR were excluded, a side difference in the range of motion of extension of the hip was shown to be a good predictor for “asymmetrical effusion” (positive predictive value: 71%, negative predictive value: 80%).

CONCLUSION This study showed a relatively high prevalence of ultrasonic joint effusion in adults with hip pain in general practice. Furthermore the results indicate a relation between joint effusion and clinical signs.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.